I noticed Jim Caviezel was trending. I wondered why. I did a search. So he mentioned adrenochrome in a recent appearance (the context is interesting). So I searched for "adrenochrome". I guess Twitter didn't want me to do that.(I'm not saying they're drinking baby blood, mind.)
In other news, Newsweek reports that blood from young people might slow aging.
And you know, it's not exactly news that people, especially rich old people, have wanted to beat death from time immemorial.
I'm just sayin'. I don't believe in this stuff.
I think this might be the time to pull out my famous thread about cannibalism. Because the world is much bigger and more horrific than many of you knew. Sorry. I learn things and then, being a teacher, I teach.
By the way, bear in mind that in the above thread, all those "sensitive content" labels are covering up totally mainstream sources like the BBC, Vox, VICE, The Sun, etc.
And I want to underscore that I do not believe that anybody is extracting adrenochrome from babies.
I'm not ruling it out, either. I mean, I am generally skeptical when it comes to most questions. I'm open to evidence. I just haven't *seen* any strong evidence, thank goodness.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Rolling Stone comes out as a lockdown skeptic, joining Van Morrison, Eric Clapton, and other people you used to think were cool before they...became...counter-cultural?
I mean...we're talking about Mick Jagger and other rock icons, not exactly conservatives, coming out against lockdowns?
What can it mean? Maybe that being forced to stay locked up, muzzled, jabbed, and increasingly surveilled is...inconsistent with the freedom they represent.
That generation is now old, but some of them sure don't want to participate in this fearful, stodgy, controlling old attitude.
Not the Rolling Stones, but certainly from the same generation:
Never mind that widespread, enthusiastic hostility toward policing as an institution, together with official Democratic tolerance of violent rioting in inner cities loosely directed at police, has resulted in a 33% rise in murder.
Never mind that in Chicago alone, from 2020 to 2021, that will mean a rise in murders from approximately 769 to 1023, i.e., in that city alone, these righteous causes resulted in the deaths of ~254 more people. Most of them, of course, were (will be) black.
Black Lives Matter!
Source: the CNN article says there was a 33% homicide rise in Q1 2021. If this rate continues throughout 2021, then since that Chicago had 769 homicides in 2020, they'll see ~254 more murders this year.
That was just before he released this video, in which he is portrayed first as being corrupted by the serpent in the Garden, then as an angel falling all the way to Hell where he has sex with Satan (in the video). YOU'VE BEEN WARNED:
Twitter's refusal to stop this horrible crime taking place on its own website looks delibate, considering—well, just look: thenextweb.com/socialmedia/20…
This is not just the opinion of a few people. Russia has threatened to block Twitter if they don't "take steps to remove banned content," including ch!ld po4n: msn.com/en-us/news/tec…
I mean, it's a fair question. If companies are pressured to cancel/block content for racially insensitive depictions of people, for criticizing trans ideology, for being by Clarence Thomas during Black History Month, for being a conservative forum, etc., then why *not* cancel...
...the Bible? The Bible advocates against gender equality, says slavery is OK (well, it does, sort of), recommends brutal treatment of adherents of pagan religions, threatens nonbelievers generally with hellfire, and even has God commanding genocide.