It should by now be clear to anyone that all those who believed that Biden's election in place of Trump would be good for Ukraine or for the cause of freedom in Russia and Taiwan and everywhere else were utterly wrong.
Not only were they wrong but they were very predictably wrong, as I pointed out here on numerous occasions.
It is clearly too much to expect of these people to admit it, but key should now be discredited and however much "expertise" they claim to possess, their opinions should be treated with great scepticism.
The claim that Trump was some kind of "Russian asset" was improbable from the start but eventually
(especially offer new sanctions on Russia were imposed by the Trump administration and military aid started to be delivered) they became absurd.
Anyone who persisted with such claims after that point was either being dishonest and serving a hidden agenda on a political fool, who continues to deceive himself in order not to admit his misjudgements to others or even to himself.
The only major figure do got Trump entirely correct
was John Bolton.
There is no doubt that Trump never cared about Ukraine, or Taiwan or any country other than the USA. He was also entirely transactional in foreign policy and could have traded away almost any principle of ally
if he could get the right kind of deal. But Trump was severely restricted in what he could do in this respect. Any deal that he got would, of course, be fiercely attacked by Democrats and Never Trumpers and the media, but in addition,
unless he managed to get something really valuable, he would have met a strong opposition among many of be GOP mainstream who reluctantly chose to support him once it became clear he had the majority of their voter base behind him.
And Trump could not afford this, because it was always a lie that he had managed to turn the GOP in Congres into zombies. Soon after Trump's election I wrote here
that he would not be make the deals he wanted to make
(with Putin as well as Xi-Jinping and Kim Jong-un) because the kind of thing he would need to get they would not be willing or able to offer or deliver (and conversely).
Putin indeed wanted to trade Syria for Ukraine but for Trump, who publicly disparaged the value of Syria, that would not have provided enough to sell the the GOP, let alone the American public. Some "experts" here declared that a US-Russia alliance against China could be the
basis of such a deal but as I have pointed out many times, such a thing may be possible with Putin's successor but not as long as Putin is at the helm in Russia.
In any case, to make a deal Trump had to be offered something real and big, at least on the scale of the Abraham Accords (which was a genuinely impressive achievement however much Democrats and some Never Trumpers try not to see it).
Trump was quite capable of trading any principle and almost any ally (as Bolton feared) but at least for something real and substantial, and not for "joint struggle against climate change".
In fact to any thinking person it should be obvious that Kerry deserves far more to be suspected of being a Russian and Chinese asset than anyone on the Trump team, except, of course that in Kerry's case there is a better explanation: sheer stupidity of this most stupid senior
American politician in modern history. Trump is ignorant and unprincipled but compared with Kerry he is indeed a stable genius.
Anyway, although one could never be quite sure of anything with Trump, the chances of him allowing himself to be publicly made a fool of and humiliated
in the way that we are now seeing done to the current administration were small. And moreover, Putin and Xi could also never be sure how Trump would respond or even if he would actually keep any promise he might have made.
Which, of course, in these circumstances, was a good thing. The current administratio on the other hand, is entirely predictabl. And that is what Ukraine, Navalny and perhaps Taiwan and all of us may well end up paying a very high price.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

16 Apr
@CassianoDFarias That was discussed already at the beginning of the pandemic, see for example this extract from a paper in Nature, and the difficulties were described in some detail by K. Chumakov isn several interviews in a Russian. And for each adenovirus based vaccine there have since been
@CassianoDFarias reports of production difficulties. Russia has hardly produced any second doses for its Sputnik 5 vaccine (it uses a different adenovirus from the one used for the first dose and it seems that can’t grow it in large quantities so they have been touting “Sputnik Light” - which
@CassianoDFarias just the first dose of Sputnik V. AstraZeneca’s problems are well known, see for example

theguardian.com/business/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
15 Apr
Today on Mark Solonin’s YouTube Chanel there is another fascinating video in his “technicum” (a word use for technological higher schools in Russia & much of Eastern Europe), that is, how he calls his presentations devoted to technical (usually related to aviation) aspects of
recent history (this includes a series of talks on the development of atom bombs). Mark Solonin is the leading “revisionist” (i.e. one who rejects the official Soviet version) of WWII on the Eastern Front (aka “The Great Patriotic War”) as well as an aviation engineer, who used
to work on secret Soviet projects in Samara (in Soviet days “Kuybyshev”). Now Solonin has finally turned to a subject that I was long hoping he would take up: the Smolensk air disaster of 2010. I have listened only to about a half of the talk & will report on the whole later.
Read 11 tweets
14 Apr
The final part of Illarionov's article is entitled "What Biden's phone call revealed about his attitude to Ukraine". I decided it would be better to make it into a separate thread, as it is essentially self-contained.
Not Biden's call (and the follow-up) clearly clearly showed what he was going to do and what he was not going to do. A lot of additional information has emerged showing how Biden actually relates to Ukraine.
First, the Washington-based "Politico" , which seems to have monopolized the channels of intentional leaks from the White House, has reminded us not for the first time that Biden had been keeping Ukraine at arm's length. ...
Read 39 tweets
11 Apr
So here is Latynina's view on things. And, I have to say, I find it the most convincing of all.
Yes, these are demonstrative actions, it is important to emphasize, because all this happens in the daytime, without any disguise. But we must understand that if the demonstration does not have an effect, then it can get out of control.
And, of course, we also must not forget Russian propagandists who tell us about an innocent baby which was killed by “Ukrainian fascists” for ritual purposes, by using a drone.
Read 34 tweets
10 Apr
The first Western book on WWII on the Eastern Front worthy of the name, that is, one that doesn’t (at least in a large degree) parrot Soviet and post-Soviet propaganda (especially the lies contained in the so called “memoirs” of Soviet marshals (the very worst liar being Zhukov)
and does rely on new documents uncovered in Soviet archives during the “period of chaos” (that is, until Putin closed them again), especially by Mark Solonin. Still, it’s already a little dated, does not refer to the lates evidence and curiously believes that Solonin is a
pseudonym (Solonin lives outside Russia, in Estonia I believe, and uses his own name. He now has his own YouTube Chanel, where he has been explaining the history of the construction of the American & Soviet atom bombs (yes, the first Soviet version was entirely based on stolen
Read 5 tweets
9 Apr
Andrei Illarionov "Why Biden's phone call has increased the risk of another Putin offensive". My translation (with some cuts). Part I.
Perhaps dear readers you may not have noticed it yet, but astute political analysts (henceforth known as APA), who had previously announced the beginning of a “new cold war” by the “second Churchill”, have now have announced
the end of the more than seven year Russian-Ukrainian war, and as a result : " On April 2, 2021, the Russian-Ukrainian war ended in an unconditional political defeat for the Russian Federation."
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!