HVAC without V is a HAC(k) job

🧵 about ventilation
- Mechanical versus Natural ventilation
- ASHRAE Standard 62.1 historical rates
- Why schools are under-ventilated?
- What is the cost of outside air?
- What we should do about it?
Note 1: According to ASHRAE Standard 62.1 (most prominent ventilation standard), ventilation is not only about outside air. Rather, it is the sum of outside air and return air that is cleaned.

In this thread, I will focus only on outside air.
Note 2: schools are either designed to have mechanical ventilation (intentional OA from HVAC unit) or natural ventilation (intentional OA through windows and doors).

Most schools in North America are mechanically ventilated (for many reasons mainly for comfort and safety).
Note 3: Ventilation rates from ASHRAE Standard 62.1 are minimum rates.

Every building need to comply with these rates at a minimum in order to be occupied. Buildings can not obtain certificate of occupancy without complying.
Mechanical Ventilat. case:

HVAC system lasts < 25 years, meaning that for old buildings HVAC was replaced > 1996.

To replace HVAC, you need a permit that shows that the new design complies with min OA rate 👇.

This means that schools have min OA (design) same or > 2019 rate.
Natural ventilation case - 1: some schools uses natural ventilation. But this is not a slam dunk... It carefully requires designing windows, opening sizes, airflow/studying outside air conditions (three pages requirement in the standard).
Natural vent -2: It will NOT work all the time. Ventilation experts warn that “simply opening windows and doors without the use of exhaust fan, does not ensure adequate filtration – dependent on natural driving forces caused by the difference in temp wind speed."
Natural vent -3: this is why Standard 62.1 requires every natural ventilation design to have a backup mechanical ventilation design.

If the building is NOT designed for natural ventilation, opening windows will not work all the time.
We know that schools are under-ventilated:
Lit. review By Dr. Fisk (2017) of studies with large # of classrooms: CO2 concentrations often far exceed 1000 ppm👇

OA rate was ~50% rate of Standard with some studies showing only 2 cfm/person.
Dr. @CorsIAQ reported similar results from a 4-yr study involving 7 high schools of different ages & construction, & 46 classrooms"
Why are schools are under-ventilated?

I wrote about this in 2018. Below are the dirty half dozens reasons to why buildings operate without ventilation and what should we do about it.

The problem applies to all buildings including schools.
@CorsIAQ reported that each schools they tested had mechanical ventilation with capability to increase OA.

The reason why schools were under-ventilated was to save energy (energy required to condition the outside air)
How much energy does outside air cost?

According to Fisk (2017), annual costs range from few dollars to max of $10 per person PER YEAR --> "small price to pay given evidence of benefits"
Minimum ventilation is key to decrease risk of transmission during COVID. Beyond COVID, there is a compelling evidence of association of increased student performance by few % to as much as 15%, reduced absence (and diseases) with ventilation (i.e., lowering indoor pollutants).
All of this to say is that schools should prioritize looking into their ventilation systems especially with the available relief money:
1) check what type of OA system (mech versus natural),
2) perform a test and balance,
3) determine maximum OA capability at worst conditions
There is NO excuse!!

We have a moral obligation to protect our children.

Money is available to be used for basic and proven strategies: outside air, mech. filtration, UV.

and should NOT be spent on adding chemicals to the air (No To Ionizers, UV-PCO, O3, DHP, etc.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marwa Zaatari

Marwa Zaatari Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marwa_zaatari

21 Mar
🧵I am going to expand on the first point from @don_milton. See @linseymarr tweet below.

-How to achieve 10 L/s/Person (22 CFM/person) of outside air
-What does it mean in terms of 3’ to 6’ social distance.
-How to achieve >4 ACH
-Myths regarding air cleaning
Example used throughout the thread:

Classroom: 960 ft2
Specific dimension: 30' x 32'
Number of occupants: 30 (this is the design number, taking into account average classroom density - pre COVID)
1) Ventilation
By code, this classroom would have 415 CFM of airflow of outside air. This airflow is being forced through the HVAC system (unit in classroom or mechanical room).

By code, when designed, every classroom in United States need to comply with this requirement.
Read 21 tweets
17 Mar
Check here for a Step-by-Step guidance how to choose an ionizer or a UV+catalyst device. Follow these simple 3 steps for proper selection! Image
Step 1: STOP 🛑 do not do it. Do not think about it. At best It does not work, at worst it produces harmful by-products.
Step 2: focus only MERV 13, Outside air, portable HEPA filtration, properly designed UVGI.
Read 4 tweets
17 Mar
I will show an equal love to another bi-polar ionization technology claiming the usual 99.99% and no by-products.

In this thread, I will discuss two studies one by FEMA/CDC and one by Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment (BTSA) NY versus the manufacturer claims.
Manufacturer claims no (ZERO) ozone production. Published test on the website from an outside lab:
atmosair.com/wp-content/upl…

Test Date = 2005
Independent testing by CDC/FEMA (1/2) - 2009:

After hurricanes Katrina and Rita, FEMA purchased provided temporary housing for families who were displaced by the storms and looked for air cleaners to reduce formaldehyde but decided first to test if they produce ozone.
Read 7 tweets
15 Mar
More results involving Electronic Air Cleaners. This time using Hydrogen Peroxide in the air for air/surface disinfection (PCO + DHP).

I will focus on the air disinfection results.

Results are from a chamber test 👇.
Principle of work per manuf.: the device produces dry hydrogen peroxide with max concentration of 20 ppb that is able to last long enough to diffuse throughout the space (half life is 30 - 60 mins; for comparison: half life of ions is in the seconds).

trane.com/content/dam/Tr…
Result from the in-duct device (Name = Blade DHP) show that the device is not very effective to reduce airborne concentration (<10% effective).

Note: You will need to subtract natural decay curve.
Read 4 tweets
9 Mar
The defeat of ions.

Thread about Needle Point Bi-polar Ionization.

What the manufacturer claims versus what independent studies report.
@ShellyMBoulder @jljcolorado @JimRosenthal4
What the manufacturer claims?
I will focus on three claims: reduction of PM count by agglomeration, surface inactivation of COV-2, removal of VOCs + formaldehyde.
-GPS+MERV 8 reduced particle count concentration by 89.7%
-GPS report 99.8% SARS-COV-2 surface inactivation
What the independent studies by subject matter experts found (device tested is produced by GPS).

Claim of reduction of particulate matter concentration: False.

Source: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@stephensbrent @etgall
Read 8 tweets
15 Feb
1) About MERV 13 - upgrading filters to MERV13 is the cheapest and most consistent/ practical solution:
For a 10,000 ft2 school buildings or 15 classrooms, it only costs $546/YEAR. This simple upgrade will give you ~5 ACH.
2) About air purifiers, it costs equal or more than $250 to put 1 purifier in 1 classroom (500 ft2) to give ~5 ACH.

Here is a collection of air purifiers available on the market (fan + HEPA filter) compared by cost/ft2 and noise.
3) About ventilation (1/3): if the building open the outside air dampers as designed (per minimum code), you get an extra 4.23 ACH.

-> A lot of studies found that schools are under ventilated because the operators chose to save energy (closing the outside damper on purpose)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!