1/n A friend asked me a few days ago what was true about the saying of medics about younger people being hospitalized more often recently in Argentina.
The results are in and the diagnosis is: "Anecdotitis".
2/n Like any scientists that is confronted with some 'truth', you try to figure out the nitty gritty details of it. I know what you are thinking, but scientists are a pretty rare species nowadays. I would say an endangered species.
3/n The first thing anyone with at least 2 fingers of forehead is to go to the case file and look at the distribution of death. Well, not unexpected AT ALL.
4/n Then you go and look into hospitalizations, then we find those that have date of entry into hospital care. Easy-peasy. But then you find that the median age is 58yo... WTF!!! So, there is something here after all!!!
5/n But, did you notice that they said 'recently'?. So, if 58yo was the entire dataset, what is the number for the last months... I was scared (NOT) for a few minutes. So, I would take the last month and a half. Back to 60+yo in median. Mhhh... are you smelling that too?
6/n That makes me think of something, hospitals are paid extra for SARS-Cov-2 cases. If you would hospitalize people that wouldn't actually need it when would that happen? Obviously, when there was not a lot of cases before the first wave peak. Right? So that is what I filtered.
7/n There you go, anecdotitis. I am sorry to have to say this, I dont like to call out people that given the situation is doing the best they can on a shit situation, but ICU MDs are especially prone to confirmation bias. They look at the worst cases, so they miss the forest.
8/n Pretty PLEASE!!! Let the ones that know how to work with the statistics say that and do what you know how to do BEST which is treating people that it is very ill. NO, younger people are not being hospitalized more in Argentina.
9/n Problem arise because you used to see milder cases in the ICU or in the floor that are now sent home. The only you see now are the worst cases creating a disproportionately partial and WRONG view. Fear mongering when not true at the TV is WRONG (even if you think it is true).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Federico Andres Lois

Federico Andres Lois Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @federicolois

18 Apr
1/n A pedido de un amigo que me la pidió en español (no tengo muchos seguidores que puedan hacer uso) va mi análisis sobre la edad de las hospitalizaciones en AMBA. El original acá:
2/n Un amigo me preguntó muy preocupado hace unos días que hay de verdad sobre todos los médicos que salen a decir que cada vez hospitalizan gente más joven en Argentina/AMBA.

El diagnóstico: "Anecdotitis"
3/n Cuando alguien con entrenamiento científico es confrontado con una 'verdad', lo primero que hace es tratar de saber más al nivel de detalle. Ya se lo que estas pensando. Te digo que los científicos son una especie rara y en peligro de extinción (y no aparecen en televisión).
Read 11 tweets
17 Apr
1/n If you are going to call someone an antivaxxer just make sure that the person in question may know *a bit* more than you about the topic in question. And can actually show proof he is NOT. Think once, think twice, THINK before embarrassing yourself!!!
2/n But you know, I may have converted to being an antivaxxer recently (that would be a good escape). I just think that what antivaxxer parent would vaccinated their kid 2 weeks ago on the 5th of April of 2021
3/n Why do I do this? Why do I willingly show the vaccination history? Because I am tired of people that has not done the research to judge in binary terms something that it is not. If you haven't done the research it is on you, not me.
Read 4 tweets
16 Apr
1/n I find it interesting the poor understanding of risk by medical professionals. Just for the record, I am pro-vaccines, but I am anti-ignorance more. If you have risk from 2 independent events (covid positive and vaccination) the risk gets added.
2/n From probability we know that: P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) + P(A and B)
For context, what is the probability of dying from COVID-19 or dying from Vaccine Adverse reaction.
3/n Purist would say then that we need to take the conditional probability, so the formula would be:
P(dying | COVID-19 or Vaccine) = P( dying | COVID-19 ) + P( dying | Vaccine ) + P( dying | COVID-19 and Vaccine )
Read 8 tweets
9 Apr
Can someone tell me if I am getting this right? If I haven't been proved positive of SARS-Cov-2 by either PCR or Antibodies authors can still count me as #LongCOVID anyways and Journal editors disagree with that? Mhhh, that sounds like Journal doing some science for change.
Apparently I was getting it right. So 39% of the sample was actually positive for SARS-Cov-2, while probably the whole sample was positive for "Probable Acute Viral Infection". NOW, the last phrase in statistics have a known name: "Crapping on your sample".
But let's follow on the 'false-negatives' if 61% of your sample are false-negative, can anyone explain to me: Why are we testing?
Read 4 tweets
6 Apr
1/n Update on my home-town 'interesting' SARS-Cov-2 'non-situation'. If you haven't read the thread I am citing, read that one first because this is an update on that.
2/n As I stated there I have been tracking the disease there because my parents and my grandparents live there. So, I have invested interest into understanding the situation.
3/n I also know the infectious disease expert in charge there too and I discussed with her the strategy back in August after they detected their first 50 cases and we did a estimation on the sizing of the hospital ICU care necessary and final death toll.
Read 12 tweets
19 Mar
@martinmoline @Gus_Noriega @nytimes 1/n Vamos a hacer una cosa, el que no entiende de ciencia te va contar algo que obviamente vos ya sabes, pero decime donde me estoy equivocando.
@martinmoline @Gus_Noriega @nytimes 2/n Ritter et al. [1975] “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.” Oops. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1157412/
@martinmoline @Gus_Noriega @nytimes 3/n Ha’eri and Wiley [1980] le pusieron microesferas de albumina al interior de las máscaras (source control) y las buscaron en las heridas luego de 20 operationes. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.” Mhhh. europepmc.org/article/med/73…
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!