SCOOP: China is using over $930,000 of foreign tech to control the South China Sea, mostly from US companies, including unmanned surface vehicle components and a military-grade countersurveillance device.

Thread on my findings: (1/)
rfa.org/english/news/s…
I found that Sansha City has acquired or plans to acquire hardware, equipment, software, and materials from at least 25 different companies based in the United States, Sweden, Austria, Italy, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Taiwan, amounting to 66 items across 13 contracts. (2/)
Sansha City is headquartered on Woody Island, is responsible for directly administering the PRC’s claims in the South China Sea, and has an extremely close organizational and operational relationship with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). (3/)
This means that all of the foreign tech acquired by Sansha City, which is basically a civilian front for the PLA, is directly helping China assert control over the contested South China Sea at the expense of other countries in the region. (4/)
My investigation found that Sansha systematically obtains foreign technology through procurement contracts with third-party Chinese companies. How exactly these Chinese companies acquire the items from foreign companies, however, remains unclear. (5/)
The city is using items from foreign companies for monitoring land and sea areas, maritime law enforcement, environmental monitoring, inter-island transportation boats, maritime communications infrastructure, countersurveillance, IT infrastructure, and medical equipment. (6/)
One notable example of how Sansha is using this foreign tech is in the L30 unmanned surface vehicle, sometimes known as the “Look Out”, which can navigate autonomously and mount a precision missile launcher. (7/)
The L30 ordered by Sansha includes $233,571 of components from foreign companies, namely an AIS transponder, a weather monitoring device, two drives, and two diesel engines. You can even see the foreign drives on the L30 at expos and in promotional videos. (8/)
The L30 is designed to carry out missions such as reconnaissance, precision strikes, and guarding islands and reefs as well as their surrounding waters. It will be used by Sansha City’s municipal coastguard force. (9/)
The city also appears to have acquired a countersurveillance device from Research Electronics International (REI), a US company. Records indicate that REI has sold this device and other products in the same line to the FBI, the DOD, the US Navy, and the US Coast Guard. (10/)
According to REI, the device can “rapidly and reliably detect and locate illicit tampering and security vulnerabilities on both digital and analog telephone systems” and “accurately analyze phones and lines for faults and security breaches.” (11/)
REI told me that “all of our sales, throughout the world, are made in full compliance with the law and US export regulations” and that “we have no records of the companies you are inquiring about and we have not made any sales to Sansha City.” (12/)
If REI’s statement is accurate, that means Sansha City may have illicitly acquired the device in question, which relevant U.S. authorities might view as a sensitive item subject to certain export restrictions on national security grounds. (13/)
I talked with @emily_sw1, @afeng79, and @jmulvenon about how Sansha City’s behavior mirrors longstanding Chinese government tech transfer practices and why this issue is a big concern for the US government. (14/)
Importantly, because Sansha is still actively acquiring foreign tech, unless the U.S. government and other relevant authorities take action, China’s efforts to dominate the South China Sea will continue to be supported by foreign technology. (15/)
Be sure to check out the full article for more details and this fantastic cartoon by @RadioFreeAsia’s cartoonist! (16/)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zachary Haver

Zachary Haver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zacharyhaver

13 Apr
I found that the Chinese government trademarked the entire South China Sea in 2014, filing thousands of trademark applications covering 281 specific rocks, reefs, and regions – including features already occupied by other countries.

Thread: (1/) benarnews.org/english/news/p…
Each of these trademarks is composed of the feature’s name in stylized Chinese calligraphy and is categorized under one of 45 international trademark classes. All of the trademarks belong to Sansha City, which administers China’s claims in the South China Sea. (2/)
Many also have an English transliteration of the feature’s name and an illustrated logo. These are the trademarked names and logos for Mischief Reef, Fiery Cross Reef, Subi Reef, and the entire Spratly Islands. (3/)
Read 9 tweets
1 Apr
Ran across an interesting study from back in 2013: Chinese researchers evaluated the "strategic position" of 131 features in the Spratly Islands. Explicitly proposed improving the "strategic position" of features through artificial construction... (1/)
(2/) Looks like the research received state funding via the 863 Program. And the authors were all affiliated with the Nanjing University Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology.
(3/) They analyzed a bunch of different factors, ranging from "maritime military deterrence effect" to "navigation ease" to "runway construction length conditions."
Read 7 tweets
26 Mar
PRC officials claim that the ships swarming Whitsun Reef do not belong to China's maritime militia.

But even if that were true, China can still mobilize civilian fishermen to control areas of the South China Sea.

Thread on my latest for @CCPWatch: (1/)

ccpwatch.org/single-post/ch…
(2/) Thanks to China's investments in the BeiDou satellite navigation system, nearly every civilian fishing vessel operating in the South China Sea can perform a maritime surveillance role. This is because BeiDou has built-in two-way texting capabilities.
(3/) When Chinese fishermen are carrying out their normal fishing activities, if they spot a foreign vessel, they can use BeiDou to quickly report the foreign vessel to the authorities (e.g. the CCG or PLA).
Read 11 tweets
14 Jan
This analysis of the dynamics at play in the South China Sea is dangerously misleading. A few reasons why: (1/)
(2/) First, we need to make a distinction between China's massive reclamation campaign and the minor reclamation activities of other claimants. China is the only claimant that has built artificial islands the size of Washington DC.
(3/) Moreover, the US is not imposing "sanctions" on Chinese entities. It is imposing visa restrictions and export restrictions, which are not the same thing as sanctions. This might seem pedantic, but the distinction is important (more on this later).
Read 10 tweets
5 Jan
In my new report with @ChinaMaritime, I reveal how Sansha City has built a system of administrative control in the South China Sea (SCS) and how China is using this system to transform contested areas into de facto Chinese territory.

Thread: (1/)
digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-maritime-…
(2/) Sansha was created in 2012 and is headquartered on Woody Island. Its jurisdiction covers 2 million square kilometers and includes the Paracel Islands, the “Zhongsha Islands” (Macclesfield Bank and Scarborough Shoal), the Spratly Islands, and their surrounding waters.
(3/) As China’s vanguard in the SCS, Sansha is responsible for exercising administrative control, implementing military-civil fusion, and performing the work of “rights defense, stability maintenance, environmental protection, and resource development” (维权维稳保护开发).
Read 12 tweets
4 Dec 20
As usual, @QuincyInst's views on the South China Sea disputes are divorced from reality. In what world should we stop exercising our freedom of navigation in exchange for "affirmations" from China that they won't interfere with our freedom of navigation? That makes no sense.
Moreover, Quincy conveniently fails to address the most pressing issue in the South China Sea: how China uses maritime law enforcement and maritime militia forces to preclude it's neighbors (including U.S. allies and partners) from operating freely within their own waters.
Simply put, you can't provide recommendations for U.S. policy in the South China Sea without addressing the problem of assertive PAFMM and CCG operations. Nothing gets solved as long as China gets to aggressively use the PAFMM and CCG without facing any consequences.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!