1. The number of virus "Variants"is a function of time.
This is a biological & virological phenomenon.
A variant is a virus that has genetic sequences with enough mutations to make them distinct and detectable by genotypic testing.
Viral mutations are the norm, not the exception
2. Viruses are the most primitive of semi-living particles. In fact many scientists debate over whether they are living or not.
They lack sophisticated genetic machinery and are comprised of very rudimentary genetic sequences.
Some contain RNA others contain DNA.
3. Because viruses lack their own cellular machinery to manufacture RNA or DNA, they need to hijack the host cell's manufacturing apparatus..
When viruses multiply, they replicate the genetic material but lack proof reading.
4. Therefore any errors introduced during virus replication (which has to occur within the host) are not proofread by the virus. These are the so-called mutations. For any given virus, these mutations occur all the time.
5. Some mutations are too small to be noticed, some so large that they render the virus non-infectious to their hosts.
At any given time any given number of mutations can be happening.
6. In the end the confluence of mutations that allow the virus to remain pathogenic, continue to be confer infectiousness to the host and not render the virus entirely blighted are what determines the range of mutagenicity.
7. It follows logic then that during the pandemic when millions or hundreds of millions of people are infected, more mutations are occurring than when there isn't a pandemic.
More multiplication equals more mutation. This is not complicated.
8. Typically many mutations that preserve the pathogenicity of the virus also decrease the capacity of the virus to multiply.
This concept in virology is called
"reduced fitness"
9. What this means is that the more mutant a virus, the less likely it is to be able to replicate at the same rate as the original one.
The original strain of the virus is typically called "wild type"
10. Given uncontrolled spread of infection, most infections will occur with the wild type virus because wild type is the virus best able to replicate and the one most able to propagate.
Again not a complicated concept.
11. However, once there is an effective therapeutic treatment, either antivirals, vaccine, naturally immunity or what have you, the wild type virus no longer has the same replicative advantage as it previously did.
12. It is then that these mutants gain the upper hand. They may not be able to multiply as well, but the fact that they have even a slight advantage over the wild type allows them to emerge over time in any given population.
13. From an evolutionary standpoint the virus has only one job, to preserve its species and to propagate itself. It does everything possible to not go extinct. Mutations are nature's way of making sure viruses don't go completely extinct.
14. Which means in any population where infection has been established for a long time, selection pressure disfavors wild type and favors mutations purely because of the survival advantage it affords the species.
This isn't complicated either.
15. Which means any pandemic that has lasted for a year, has now enabled mass vaccination and effective therapeutics is ripe for multiple different mutations and mutants.
16. The notion that we need more lockdowns is plainly idiotic and antithetical to the very basic tenets of virology and epidemiology.
Herd immunity broadly confers protection the occasional escape mutation will continue to occur one way or the other.
17. In fact flu viruses mutate so often that the seasonal flu vaccine which is based on the last year's circulating genotype is hardly ever more efficacious than 50%.
18. And most people who used to get admitted to the hospital with severe flu (back when flu was a thing) were vaccinated with the flu vaccine.
19. Nobody ever said "hey we got flu variants, let's shut down the entire world for a year, wear double masks and listen to what the garden gnome has to say even though he's been wrong every single time"
20. The reason why nothing we've done has worked is because we put a group of inveigling power hungry despots in charge of controlling the smallest infectious particle there is and are are offended and surprised to learn that they're trying to control us instead.

-Fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rising serpent 🇺🇸

Rising serpent 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rising_serpent

23 Mar
Thread on the real racism
With receipts.

Kamala's neice
Virginia Senate Democrat candidate.
Denver public School education board director, and of course, Democrat.
Read 7 tweets
28 Jan
What's a short?
Short-sellers borrow shares of an asset that they believe will drop in price in order to buy them after they fall. If they're right, they return the shares and pocket the difference between the price when they initiated the short and the actual sale price.
If they're wrong, they're forced to buy at a higher price and pay the difference between the price they set and its sale price.
Short sales have an expiration date, so when a stock unexpectedly rises in price, the short-sellers may have to act fast to limit their losses.
What's a Short Squeeze?
A short squeeze occurs when a stock jumps sharply higher, forcing traders who had bet that its price would fall, to buy it in order to forestall even greater losses. Their scramble to buy only adds to the upward pressure on the stock's price.
Read 7 tweets
11 Jan
It's been a long time since I said it, and who knows if there'll be a chance to do so in the future. So here goes:
I've learned more by being on Twitter than I could have imagined, and it was possible only because so many excellent people say so many amazing things. So thank you
I had absolutely no intention of using social media when I started. It was just a way to defray and externalize internal angst while having to forgo the almost always painful work of personal reflection.
I wrote about it a year after I joined.
It was nothing more than a sojourn into the septic tank of human behavior that was supposed to make my station in life feel better by comparison.
Then the inconceivable happened.
People said stuff that made sense, resonated and instructed.
Read 15 tweets
30 Nov 20
1. Did you know that this isn't the first time Georgia's Dominion voting machines crashed or suffered a "glitch?"
The same thing happened a few months ago in September.
2. "Election officials initially thought they would have to rebuild the database but then discovered they could fix the problem through a software change"
How the hell do you go from a completely corrupted and unusable database to just needing a software update?
3. And in September Eric Coomer (yes that guy) told  U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg  that the problem had to do with the way the voting machines communicate with the underlying Android operating system. He told Totenberg "a minor software change" would address the issue.
Read 15 tweets
28 Nov 20
1. This is absolutely wild.
Did you know that the most comprehensive, detailed and well articulated exposal of the dangers inherent in the wdespread implementation of electronic voting systems came from a Democrat, and a it happened a decade ago way back in 2010?
2. John C. Bonifaz is an attorney and political activist specializing in constitutional law and voting rights. 
He also ran for Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2006 as a Democrat.
(Just so we can dispense with the "right-wing conspiracy theory" right now)
3. On July 6th 2010 he highlighted to the Technical Guidelines Development Committee
and Its UOCAVA Working Group what is, in essence, the exact same concerns that the Trump team including @SidneyPowell1 @RudyGiuliani @LLinWood have repeatedly underscored over the last few weeks.
Read 35 tweets
18 Nov 20
1. The Danish mask study is probably the only Randomized controlled trial conducted so far to study mask efficacy to prevent COVID. Blinding was of course not possible.
Remember that randomized trials provide superior data compared to observational ones.
acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
2. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis.
3. A total of 3030 participants were randomly assigned to the recommendation to wear *surgical* masks, and 2994 were assigned to control; 4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%).
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!