The premier league is a big money earner for the UK.
Huge TV money comes to UK and filters into local economy - not via profits as most clubs don’t make any - but via players, staff spending their salaries locally.
A franchise model would allow clubs to move elsewhere.
2/
What many fail to realise:
Most Premier league clubs never make a profit so the money they earn is “sticky” - it leaks out to players, staff, agents etc most of whom are resident in UK.
So for UK economy having foreign owners of non profitable clubs has been a huge benefit.
3/
But in a franchise system foreign owner could have huge incentive to take their clubs where the money is...rather than being the money to where the club happened to be when they bought them.
4/
The current UEFA rules act as a money harvesting machine for European countries. So long as the biggest clubs stay in Europe playing in European cups then we extract huge benefits.
The super league is in effect a US/Chinese/Middle East 1st attempt to detach this from Europe.
5/
The Idea that the world’s biggest club league - owned by US, Chinese billionaires or Arab SW funds and standing alone from national leagues - ...will be content to have 3 major teams coming from a corner of North West England and none from US or China is absurd.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why the row about the @nationaltrust & “woke” is absurd.
The Georgians were not only consumed with woke subjects - they pioneered boycotts, woke slogans & even woke merchandise.
“Being woke” is nothing new.
It’s English history.
- a thread -
2/
From the mid 1760s on, that epitome of refined old world English conservative style Wedgwood started producing teapots.
But not just any old teapots.
But “Woke teapots”.
Teapots that would show you cared about the ills of the world & the suffering of those less fortunate.
3/
These “Georgian woke teapots” were chosen for an explicit reason.
Tea was a refined social event.
An event that women - who were deemed naturally more sympathetic - had some power.
Women - refined women - could show their commitment to ending suffering.
The debate on Scottish independence focuses (logically & obviously) on the immediate cost to Scotland or the psychological blow it delivers to the idea of the UK.
But there’s another way of looking at it.
- thread -
2/
It’s 2022 and 🏴 has voted for independence what’s the immediate aim of 🏴🏴 & 🇪🇺?
If you think about it all 3 - even if for differing reasons - would have an interest in as little economic dislocation as possible.
3/
🏴 Clearly wouldn’t want to start in Indy with chaos
🇪🇺 Wouldn’t want to look like it was causing problems for a proEU potential member
🇬🇧 Motivation is more complex but rationally 🇬🇧 facing slow loss of NI & now 🏴 wouldn’t want to see its internal mkt shrinking even further
If Brexit is the "Will of the People" based on the 2019 election which was explicitly fought & won on Boris Johnson's "oven ready deal" in order to bring the Brexit referndum to fruition...
...then this means the Northen Irish Protocol must be the "Will of the People", too.
The next paradox:
The UK government has spent the last 4 years seemingly putting a US trade deal ahead of Northern Ireland...
...now finds it faces a US govt that puts Northern Ireland, and the Northen Irish Protocol, ahead of a trade deal with the UK.
Which leads to the next paradox...
Brexit, that was sold on the ability to do trade deals with the US & non-Europen countries....
...now depends on breaking the very deal that was sold as delivering Brexit & safeguarding the union in order to do those deals.
There are still a few remainers who think a “purist rejoin” party can be a “reverse UKIP” and move & accelerate Britain towards Rejoin.
There are many, many reasons why this won’t work.
The main one being this...
2/
UKIP drew many voters from traditional Labour, far right & non voters. So the supposed UKIP threat to the Tories was much less than many supposed. At worst it was ambiguous.
But which voters would a purist rejoin party drew from..?
3/
A purist rejoin party is clearly going to draw more younger voters from Labour/LibDems and in likely more prosperous urban areas.
These areas have often been turning away from Conservatives in last decade.
This would split the non Tory vote in crucial seats.