There are still a few remainers who think a “purist rejoin” party can be a “reverse UKIP” and move & accelerate Britain towards Rejoin.

There are many, many reasons why this won’t work.

The main one being this...
2/

UKIP drew many voters from traditional Labour, far right & non voters. So the supposed UKIP threat to the Tories was much less than many supposed. At worst it was ambiguous.

But which voters would a purist rejoin party drew from..?
3/

A purist rejoin party is clearly going to draw more younger voters from Labour/LibDems and in likely more prosperous urban areas.

These areas have often been turning away from Conservatives in last decade.
This would split the non Tory vote in crucial seats.
4/

A purist rejoin party is - let’s be honest - unlikely to draw many voters from people still voting Conservative in 2021. In 2017-19 perhaps a few, but now you’d have to be a very particular niche person to be radical immediate remain but still voting Johnson.

So...
5/

So rather than being a “reverse UKIP” a purist Rejoin party would simply split the:
rejoin/EEA(leading to rejoin) vote base in England from 3 parties into 4
And in 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 & 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 into 5.

At PRECISELY the point all pro-Brexit voters are coalescing into 1 party.

Good luck with that.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick🇬🇧🇪🇺

Nick🇬🇧🇪🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nicktolhurst

18 Apr
The debate on Scottish independence focuses (logically & obviously) on the immediate cost to Scotland or the psychological blow it delivers to the idea of the UK.

But there’s another way of looking at it.

- thread -
2/

It’s 2022 and 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 has voted for independence what’s the immediate aim of 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 & 🇪🇺?

If you think about it all 3 - even if for differing reasons - would have an interest in as little economic dislocation as possible.
3/

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Clearly wouldn’t want to start in Indy with chaos
🇪🇺 Wouldn’t want to look like it was causing problems for a proEU potential member
🇬🇧 Motivation is more complex but rationally 🇬🇧 facing slow loss of NI & now 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 wouldn’t want to see its internal mkt shrinking even further
Read 9 tweets
16 Apr
If Brexit is the "Will of the People" based on the 2019 election which was explicitly fought & won on Boris Johnson's "oven ready deal" in order to bring the Brexit referndum to fruition...

...then this means the Northen Irish Protocol must be the "Will of the People", too.
The next paradox:

The UK government has spent the last 4 years seemingly putting a US trade deal ahead of Northern Ireland...

...now finds it faces a US govt that puts Northern Ireland, and the Northen Irish Protocol, ahead of a trade deal with the UK.
Which leads to the next paradox...

Brexit, that was sold on the ability to do trade deals with the US & non-Europen countries....

...now depends on breaking the very deal that was sold as delivering Brexit & safeguarding the union in order to do those deals.
Read 4 tweets
15 Apr
Even today they’re are lots of people utterly convinced the entire Conservative party is engaged in some huge Brexit conspiracy.

The truth is actually in a way worse but....for many people disappointing.

Vast majority of Tory MPs fall into 2 camps....
1. MPs who’ve been around the block & realize brexit is a rapidly accelerating faulty answer to the wrong question but can’t say much or they’ll be destroyed & simply replaced by someone worse

2. Ex provincial town councillors who wouldn’t know a hedge fund from a hedge trimmer
3/

We’re in a car that’s driven off the edge. We’ll have some damage but no one knows how bad. So we wave flags & sing so not to alarm the kids.

Once again do you really expect these people to have worked out the trade & security implications of Brexit:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Ander…
Read 5 tweets
15 Apr
The real issue for the UK - which UK media are awkwardly & deeply conflicted over is this:

As the post Trump US & EU are attempting to rebuild & recast the western democratic alliance..

..is the UK fully signed up to this...or is it holding out for a return of Trump & Trumpism?
2/

On every level from Climate change to tax haven policy, China & Russia only by US & Europe working together can real progress be made.

There is no other option.
But for UK to be fully signed on to this requires it be fully supportive of the EUs survival, influence & success.
3/

Much as Brits might demur: the UK during the Johnson premiership was effectively in a coalition with Trump & to a certain extent Russia.

It’s now gone to actively seeking to replace the EU to..well its unclear.
Read 8 tweets
12 Apr
I tend not to post on COVID - I’ve no special knowledge in this area.

But it strikes me a likely outcome is vaccines will be successful in national terms but new variants spreading internationally.

So we could find normality returning locally...but international travel limited.
2/

If this is right - & it’s just speculation - we may find that countries will, to avoid locking themselves down, attempt to form stronger regional groups with common strict import/personal controls.

This would accelerate regional groupings along (sub)continental lines.
3/

These regional groups would have to impose strict migration/travel controls on those entering. Perhaps testing or even vaccinations for new variants.

But the area would have to be as tight as national controls.
Read 4 tweets
12 Apr
Nigel Boardman appointed to lead investigation into David Cameron lobbying scandal.

Boardman knows Cameron well as he was personally appointed by Cameron to the highly prestigious British Museum trustees.

Boardman was also implicated in fee gouging in the Carillon bankruptcy.
2/

Also not really clear if Nigel Boardman’s task of leading an investigation into David Cameron’s lobbying is compatible with his other position - a non-executive role on the board of the UK govt BEIS department.
3/

Interestingly Boardman is responsible for seeing that govt contracts & business was carried out properly - so in a sense Boardman has now been tasked with investigating his - and his employer’s - the Govt - own failure.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!