The debate on Scottish independence focuses (logically & obviously) on the immediate cost to Scotland or the psychological blow it delivers to the idea of the UK.
But there’s another way of looking at it.
- thread -
2/
It’s 2022 and 🏴 has voted for independence what’s the immediate aim of 🏴🏴 & 🇪🇺?
If you think about it all 3 - even if for differing reasons - would have an interest in as little economic dislocation as possible.
3/
🏴 Clearly wouldn’t want to start in Indy with chaos
🇪🇺 Wouldn’t want to look like it was causing problems for a proEU potential member
🇬🇧 Motivation is more complex but rationally 🇬🇧 facing slow loss of NI & now 🏴 wouldn’t want to see its internal mkt shrinking even further
4/
But also politically..
🏴 Indy confirms Brexit has failed.
Global Britain is over.
On one level this is painful.
But on another it’d free up the 🇬🇧 headspace to seek what is actually helpful rather than the Empire 2.0 dreams.
All of a sudden new options present themselves.
5/
Is 🇬🇧 shorn of 🏴 & NI really going to pursue an 🏴&🏴 version of Brexit?
The biggest trade win would involve keeping 🏴 Mkt & looking again at 🇪🇺 trade.
Now I’m not saying that 🏴Indy makes 🇪🇺 rejoin more likely but rather it makes a more humble Brexit policy inevitable.
6/
A lot of people buy into idea 🏴 economy is tiny compared to 🏴. Its smaller yes - but still significant.
🇬🇧 without 🏴 & NI confirms its drop to below 🇫🇷 & 🇮🇳. Perhaps more importantly it means 🇬🇧 is much nearer to 🇮🇹 than 🇩🇪 in economic terms.
This is Brexit as little 🏴.
7/
So what could be on offer?
What would post Indy 🏴 🇬🇧 & 🇪🇺 want.
The answer is clear:
No borders between 🏴 & 🏴 Indeed economic status quo to remain as much as possible.
🏴 Indy *could* be the lever towards a reappraisal of soft Brexit.
And a soft Brexit could help...
8/
A soft Brexit could help 🏴 & r🇬🇧 towards a new kind of relationship:
More than federal but with so many shared institutions that full independence is masked - a kind of (whisper it softly) EU for the UK if you like...
9/
Much as the invention of the Commonwealth masked independence of the old empire..
..a UK of “shared institutions & practices” across 🏴🏴🏴 could help soften the blow of independence of these countries within a soft Brexit.
And Rejoin?
That’ll be for another day...
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The premier league is a big money earner for the UK.
Huge TV money comes to UK and filters into local economy - not via profits as most clubs don’t make any - but via players, staff spending their salaries locally.
A franchise model would allow clubs to move elsewhere.
2/
What many fail to realise:
Most Premier league clubs never make a profit so the money they earn is “sticky” - it leaks out to players, staff, agents etc most of whom are resident in UK.
So for UK economy having foreign owners of non profitable clubs has been a huge benefit.
3/
But in a franchise system foreign owner could have huge incentive to take their clubs where the money is...rather than being the money to where the club happened to be when they bought them.
If Brexit is the "Will of the People" based on the 2019 election which was explicitly fought & won on Boris Johnson's "oven ready deal" in order to bring the Brexit referndum to fruition...
...then this means the Northen Irish Protocol must be the "Will of the People", too.
The next paradox:
The UK government has spent the last 4 years seemingly putting a US trade deal ahead of Northern Ireland...
...now finds it faces a US govt that puts Northern Ireland, and the Northen Irish Protocol, ahead of a trade deal with the UK.
Which leads to the next paradox...
Brexit, that was sold on the ability to do trade deals with the US & non-Europen countries....
...now depends on breaking the very deal that was sold as delivering Brexit & safeguarding the union in order to do those deals.
There are still a few remainers who think a “purist rejoin” party can be a “reverse UKIP” and move & accelerate Britain towards Rejoin.
There are many, many reasons why this won’t work.
The main one being this...
2/
UKIP drew many voters from traditional Labour, far right & non voters. So the supposed UKIP threat to the Tories was much less than many supposed. At worst it was ambiguous.
But which voters would a purist rejoin party drew from..?
3/
A purist rejoin party is clearly going to draw more younger voters from Labour/LibDems and in likely more prosperous urban areas.
These areas have often been turning away from Conservatives in last decade.
This would split the non Tory vote in crucial seats.
Even today they’re are lots of people utterly convinced the entire Conservative party is engaged in some huge Brexit conspiracy.
The truth is actually in a way worse but....for many people disappointing.
Vast majority of Tory MPs fall into 2 camps....
1. MPs who’ve been around the block & realize brexit is a rapidly accelerating faulty answer to the wrong question but can’t say much or they’ll be destroyed & simply replaced by someone worse
2. Ex provincial town councillors who wouldn’t know a hedge fund from a hedge trimmer
3/
We’re in a car that’s driven off the edge. We’ll have some damage but no one knows how bad. So we wave flags & sing so not to alarm the kids.
Once again do you really expect these people to have worked out the trade & security implications of Brexit: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Ander…