korpi Profile picture
21 Apr, 8 tweets, 2 min read
70% APR on stablecoins with no impermanent loss, hardly any risk of liquidation and almost zero transaction fees. Sounds good, right? It's possible with leveraged farming of $MATIC rewards on $AAVE on Polygon. See how to do it👇
$COMP farming last year was probably the first time when DeFi users got paid for borrowing. Savvy farmers substantially increased their APRs by iterative lending and borrowing. The same can be done on $AAVE with transaction fees on Polygon so low that you can hardly feel them.
Iterative lending and borrowing works this way:
1. You have 1000 DAI and lend it on Aave.
2. You borrow 75% of your deposit, i.e. 750 DAI.
3. You lend borrowed 750 DAI on Aave.
4. You borrow 75% of your deposit, i.e. 562.50 DAI.
5. Repeat multiple times.
Looks ridiculous? Yes, a bit. But borrowing and lending on Aave is incentivized with $MATIC rewards. So the more you borrow and lend, the more rewards you get. On Ethereum it wouldn't be profitable for small amounts due to transaction costs but on Polygon, fees are unnoticeable.
With 1000 DAI of initial deposit and 10 iterations of lend and borrow, you can increase your total lend amount to 3831 DAI and total borrow amount to 2831 DAI. Taking into account $MATIC rewards, lend and borrow APRs, you can easily reach 70% APR on your initial deposit.
You can play with the spreadsheet I prepared for Aave Leverage Farming. Just make a local copy, change highlighted cells using the most recent data from Aave, input your deposit amount and number of iterations and you will get an estimate of APR. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…
I was wondering if there is a risk of liquidation in this leveraged farming but I think it simply can't happen if you lend and borrow the same asset. Even in case of oracle failure, its impact on borrow and lend value is exactly the same so it cancels out. But I'm not a dev :)
To move your funds from Ethereum to Polygon, you can use: zapper.fi/bridge

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with korpi

korpi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @korpi87

17 Apr
@n2ckchong's great educational thread on Aave inspired me to write a #CryptoTwitterManual. This is a useful guidebook to help all the new market participants navigate the Crypto Twitter (CT) minefield and avoid getting rekt by fomo.
The #CryptoTwitterManual consists of the real tweets I captured from many CT influencers with the explanation what they really could have meant. Don't be under a delusion that influencers publicly share alpha for the benefit of their followers. Most of them don't.
Not all CT influencers are mindless shillers though. Some really do care for their followers and try to educate them, not only force them to buy shilled bags. Be mindful of this fact, learn from others but not necessarily immediately buy what they shill.
Read 14 tweets
15 Apr
1) @iearnfinance TVL crossed $3B. This is a big milestone. It grounds Yearn's 1st place in the competition between yield aggregators - amazing achievement taking into account that it's the only protocol which doesn't incentivize TVL by issuance of its native token $YFI.
2) With hindsight, I think that distribution of total $YFI supply in a single farming event last summer was a big hurdle for the development of the protocol. How can you compete with others who fork your code and add token issuance on top of it to increase APY for users?
3) Yet, this lack of $YFI inflation led @iearnfinance to the place where they are today. They had to be creative to offer competitive returns for depositors. Let's summarize what they did.
Read 12 tweets
11 Apr
Let me ELI5 what happened here so that everyone could admire the power of @iearnfinance v2 vaults.
$YFI
1) Yesterday a new farm appeared on Ethereum: app.thisistheway.finance. It doesn't even matter what it is. The most important fact is that it rewards farmers with a token $BAG for staking $ETH, $WBTC, $USDC or $DAI. So it's passive earning opportunity.
2) "But sir, it's a new farm, it must be risky!" Is it? The farming contract is a slightly modified version of MasterChef - a well known and battle-tested contract on Ethereum. The only change is that it applies an exit fee on your stake if you leave early.
Read 14 tweets
5 Apr
1) It's been a while since my last bullish thread on $BNT but @Bancor Team keeps building and it deserves some commentary. Let's talk about a new addition to $BNT tokenomics, Vortex Burner, which puts deflationary pressure on circulating supply of $BNT.
2) Let's start with a quick reminder how @Bancor works. In contrast to other AMMs like $UNI or $SUSHI, in Bancor, you can provide liquidity with a single token. You don't have to pool your token with other asset which often leads to impermanent loss (IL).
3) Whitelisted pools in Bancor are fully protected from IL. It works by bundling an array of pools into one bucket. Some pools have high IL, others don't and fees they generate are used for IL compensation. It shifts IL from single-pool risk to a risk spread across many pools.
Read 19 tweets
27 Mar
1) I really like experiments. Especially the ones which can disrupt what we are currently used to. DeFi is the best example - an attempt to disrupt TradFi with a code. AMMs are already disrupting centralized exchanges and constantly evolve. What about the final form of AMM?
2) This is what @IntegralHQ tries to achieve - the final form of AMM, the one that eats other exchanges' liquidity. Sounds like a dream, doesn't it? So let's dive into it deeper. It's complex and I won't pretend I fully understand all the technical docs but I'll try to ELI5.
3) How will @IntegralHQ suck in all the liquidity? Technically it won't. But it will act as if it would have. This is due to its unique combination of AMM with orderbook (OB-AMM design). It allows them to mirror liquidity from other exchanges to become the cheapest one to trade.
Read 24 tweets
24 Mar
1) While I, as active liquidity provider, am excited about sophisticated options for LPs in $UNI v3, I'm also concerned that too much complexity will only serve few in the know and leave the majority of (passive) LPs behind.
2) Although I haven't conducted a survey to justify my thesis, I'm quite convinced that the majority of current LPs don't actively manage their pools. This is based on my observations and pushed me to share a set of "advanced" strategies for active LPs:
3) Uni v3 feature to provide liquidity only for a given range (+ other options) will be useful for professional market makers who will likely eat lunch of passive LPs. If passive LPs earn less, they may look for alternative simple solutions.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!