Well. This looks interesting. *sips tea*. 
Hmmm "not sought" but "received"
The words "directly" and "sought" are doing serious heavy lifting here.
Is there evidence that updates were sought indirectly? Did data magically arrive because it was received but not sought? One would wonder.
How many times is the word "directly" used in the report?
23 times.
23 times.
Is the DOH trying to blame the HSE here?
The question is less "did they seek them directly" and more "did they have data they should not have had"
"Learning". Eh the act of receiving them is itself a problem, arguably.
DOH <-> HSE
This report raises more questions than it answers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
