My recent post on nuclear has generated a lot of discussion (see link and thread below if you missed it).

Here's a thread with some replies worth reading.
Here, @mchammo argues for risk-informed regulation and says the price of nuclear can come down:
Here, @gilbeaq blames industry more than regulators, and points out that infrastructure projects and all megaprojects are prone to cost and schedule overruns
A number of good replies on Reddit, for instance this comment from allklier: reddit.com/r/rootsofprogr…
BrianHoltz on Reddit pointed me to this IEEE article arguing that nuclear has fundamental engineering and scaling limits: ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.js…
EnckesMethod on Reddit pointed me to this paper claiming that “safety-related factors were important but not the only driver of cost increases” in nuclear cell.com/joule/fulltext…
And a lot of discussion on @lesswrong as well: lesswrong.com/posts/ThvvCE2H…
Also for context, @JGAMPHO pointed me to this older thread explaining nuclear costs:
I think this issue is difficult because of feedback loops / compounding cycles.

In particular, the kinds of nuclear incumbents we have are *both a cause and an effect* of the kind of regulatory system we have.

Need to be careful in deciding which is fundamental or essential.
For instance, an analysis that “costs are high because nuclear companies are inefficient” is incomplete. *Why* do we have inefficient incumbents? And why don't they face stiffer competition?
In any case, any analysis needs to take account of all of these interactions and cycles, at multiple levels—and how they add up over a generation or more.

If there is a disease afflicting the nuclear industry, it is at an advanced stage. Not a tumor, but metastasis.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Crawford

Jason Crawford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jasoncrawford

16 Apr
In the 1950s, nuclear was the energy of the future. Two generations later, it provides only about 10% of world electricity, and reactor design hasn‘t fundamentally changed in decades. Why has it been a flop? Here's my review of a recent book on that topic: rootsofprogress.org/devanney-on-th…
Nuclear power is the sword that can cut the Gordian knot of providing cheap energy to the world while reducing CO2 emissions. And we're going to need a lot more energy: 5TW to give today's world the energy standard of Europe; 25TW to support 12B people in a decarbonized economy. ImageImage
But nuclear is more expensive than gas (7–8c/kWh) or coal (5c/kWh), mainly because of plant construction costs. These costs were dropping in the US until 1970—then started soaring. In contrast, Korea can still build for $2.50/W, which prices nuclear electricity < 4c/kWh. ImageImage
Read 21 tweets
5 Apr
I've started writing a book about the accomplishments of industrial civilization, the major discoveries and inventions behind them, and the meaning of it all.

I'm hosting a 13-month series of discussion salons through the @interintellect_ based on it: interintellect.com/series/jason-c…
The book is very much a work in progress—won't be out for a couple of years. But we'll go through the outline chapter by chapter. Each month I'll present the material I have so far and the open questions I'm still researching, and we'll discuss.

interintellect.com/series/jason-c…
This is your chance to get a sneak preview, to see inside my writing process, and to give feedback that will shape the published book.

Third Sunday of each month, from April 18, 2021 through May 15, 2022. 10am–1pm US Pacific. Here is the schedule:
Read 18 tweets
14 Feb
Curious about @slatestarcodex, but don't know where to start?

A little while ago a friend asked me to make a list of my favorite posts. So here's a beginner's guide: jasoncrawford.org/guide-to-scott…
What is @slatestarcodex about?

Like many great blogs, not any one thing: it’s the eclectic interests of a unique individual with a broad intellectual appetite.

He says he tends to focus on “reasoning, science, psychiatry, medicine, ethics, genetics, AI, economics and politics.”
What makes it so good? I tried to explain it here:
Read 19 tweets
11 Feb
We're hiring for the engineering team at @OurWorldInData!

A rare chance to build data visualization and pipelines at a well-known and highly influential organization that is focused on how to make progress against the world's biggest problems.

ourworldindata.org/jobs
For those few who haven't heard of @OurWorldInData, it's probably the top site in the world that presents research and data on topics such as global health, poverty, energy usage, agriculture and nutrition, population growth, education, etc.
The data is presented in interactive visualizations and all of it is downloadable in CSV.

As a premiere example, check out our coronavirus data explorer: ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-da…
Read 11 tweets
22 Jan
After reading the post this afternoon, I read most of it out loud to my wife just now.

It was hard, because I was alternately laughing and crying.
Why does this move me so much? It's hard to explain.

As Scott says, it's just a blog, and at the same time, it's so, so much more.
Partly of course, I'm just happy he's back. I've positively missed his writing, which I've never felt about a blog. The insight, the humor, the incisive clarity, the relentless questioning, the exhaustive data analysis.
Read 18 tweets
28 Dec 20
Only three chapters into @CharlesCMann's *The Wizard and the Prophet* and why didn't anyone insist that I read this book before? Super-relevant to progress studies.

Just finished the Borlaug chapter, which is jaw-dropping, even though I already knew the Borlaug story in outline.
The sheer amount of hardship Borlaug endured, the setbacks, the lack of support from almost everyone around him, the tedium of crossing thousands of varieties and planting them by hand… all to save the world's hungry. Someone needs to make a movie out of this.
Seriously, there are so many great scenes. Usually science is hard to make dramatic on the big screen, but this would be fairly easy.

Like this scene where he has no equipment and no one will lend him any, so he literally pulls the plow through the field himself, like a mule:
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!