Democrats are pushing to upend the country by packing #SCOTUS to cement their radical agenda.
At stake: free speech, religious liberty, the Bill of Rights, & an independent judiciary.
It’s not just Republicans who oppose packing the Court, only 43% of Dem voters support it.
2/x
Despite widespread opposition, Democrats in DC are moving full steam ahead with their terrible idea.
Instead of politicizing the Supreme Court to ram through their extreme agenda, Democrats should listen to Joe Biden's own previous warnings about packing the court.
3/x
In 1983, Joe Biden called FDR's move to pack the Supreme Court a “bonehead idea. It was a terrible, terrible mistake to make & it put in question there for an entire decade the independence of [#SCOTUS].”
Biden, listen to 1983 Biden.
4/x
Biden should also listen to 2005 Biden when he praised Democrats for standing up to FDR’s 1937 plan to pack the Supreme Court: “In an act of great courage, Roosevelt’s own party stood up against this institutional power grab.”
5/x
Even as recently as 2019, Biden said, “I would not get into court packing. We add three justices, next time around we lose control, they add three justices. We begin to lose any credibility the court has.”
6/x
Biden was on to something when he said in 2019, “No, I’m not prepared to go on and try to pack the court, because we’ll live to rue that day.”
7/x
It's not just Biden who warned about packing the court.
In 2019, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “9 seems to be a good number... I think it was a bad idea when [FDR] tried... If anything would make the court appear partisan it would be [packing the court].”
She was right.
8/x
And earlier this year, Justice Stephen Breyer criticized court packing and said #SCOTUS “is guided by legal principle, not politics. Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed that latter perception, further eroding that trust.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The White House hand-picked a TV crew to accompany their trip to the Carrizo Springs, NOT the Donna facility.
That’s not transparency.
True transparency would be to open the Donna facility to press that’s at 1,556% capacity when 18 Senators go there Friday.
Reports about the CBP's Donna facility indicate minors are hungry, have only showered once in 7 days, were forced to sleep on the floor, and haven't seen sunlight in days.
Of course the Biden admin isn't allowing cameras in that facility.
The Biden admin is instead taking a camera to HHS's Carrizo Springs facility which The Washington Post reports has a soccer field, basketball court, and "a legal services trailer has the Spanish word 'Bienvenidos,' or welcome, on a banner on its roof."
Yet another example of biased, dishonest “fact-checking.”
Newsweek admits “Individuals who overstay their visas but pay tax in the United States using a Social Security number may be eligible for stimulus payments.”
They also admit 676k visa overstays in a single year.
They ignore that those accumulate over decades, and 60% of the 12m total illegal aliens are visa overstays.
So, they conclude EVERY WORD THAT I SAID IS TRUE (and Dick Durbin’s claims to the contrary are false), but they’re left-wing propagandists, so they still call it “mostly false”!
2/x You claim “no illegal immigrants will get checks.”
Q1: Dick, true or false: 60% of illegal aliens are visa overstays.
Q2: True or false: Migrants who come to US legally on a work visa are allowed to have a SSN, yet when they overstay their visa they become illegal aliens.
3/x Q3: Dick, true or false: under the Dem bill, millions of illegal immigrants (w/ SSNs) will receive $1400 checks.
Q4: If that’s not true (you bellowed that it was “a lie!”), why did the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation determine my amendment would save taxpayers $675m?
Want to understand why we’re so divided? Why each side seems to live in alternate universes? Take a moment & examine the misinformation here (both deliberate & inadvertent).
FACT 1: Dem spending bill sends $1400 to each adult in US.