Two weeks ago, @PangolinDEX became the first Avalanche project to surpass $1B in trading volume. Let’s talk about Pangolin, AMMs, community-driven projects and their pros and cons.
Overall, Pangolin is unique because it offers:
- Fully decentralized, non-custodial trades
- Super cheap fees
- Real-time execution, near-instant finality
- No miners front-running orders
- A 100% community-driven project
While Pangolin users pay very low fees individually, AMM operations, in aggregate, contribute significantly to an ongoing burn of AVAX for smart contract fees. This value exceeds the $1.6M+ USD so far and is constantly increasing.
Among all AMMs on Ethereum, BSC, and Avalanche, Pangolin has the unique claim of being a project 100% driven by, and for, its community.
The PNG token was created with a “fair-start,” with 0 tokens allocated to its team. This is unusual. It means that there were no privileged groups who could later dump tokens on users. It also means that there is no centralized group that can arbitrarily modify the contract.
Pangolin’s bootstrapping strategy had mistakes that didn’t achieve its intended goals, however. Between an oversized airdrop and flawed liquidity reward structure, its community encountered early issues with its PNG token value.
This caused initial dilution of the asset’s value, but help is on the way.
On April 3, Pangolin’s governance module was activated. Since then, $PNG token holders are solely in control of modifying its contracts and making decisions related to Pangolin’s operation.
Shortly thereafter, the Pangolin community passed its first governance proposal. This proposal went into effect on April 18th and re-weighted Pangolin rewards.
The PNG pools now provide 3x higher rewards than other liquidity pools.
As the community continues to smooth out the early tokenomics issues, grow in size, and upgrade the application, I suspect $PNG will be an increasingly attractive asset for exchanges to list.
Congratulations to everyone in the Pangolin community on these milestones. I have a feeling we’ve only seen a small fraction of what you’re capable of.
P.S. If you were providing liquidity to Pangolin, you must re-stake your tokens with the new liquidity contracts. This typically takes 30 seconds or so. More info is available in the application: app.pangolin.exchange/#/png/1
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
FEI dropped down to $0.136. In the process, it should have taught everyone a few lessons about stablecoin design and, perhaps, crypto investing.
A thread.
FEI/TRIBE was a two-coin algorithmic stablecoin, with a twist. The twist was flawed from the start and it should have been possible to predict that this idea would not work.
In a typical two-coin algorithmic stablecoin, you have one coin, $FEI, trying to maintain the peg, while the other one is used absorb the volatility. We wrote about this structure in our stablecoin taxonomy paper.
Avalanche surpassed one million total transactions on its smart contract chain, with the vast majority in just the last 7 weeks.
In honor of this milestone, here some thoughts on why I’m bullish on Avalanche and how it is becoming the most advanced public-goods layer-1.
First and foremost, for all its flaws and quirks, the Ethereum Virtual Machine is the dominant engine in DeFi. If a project does not natively support the EVM, I do not see it as being a strong competitor in the layer-1 space.
From the moment Avalanche’s mainnet launched, the platform has supported the entirety of Ethereum’s smart contracting and tooling. No phases, years-away upgrades, or additional layers and complexity. Just feature completeness for what the market demands.
The Avalanche C-Chain is continuing to burn $AVAX at a fairly rapid clip, having crossed the $1m line recently. It's a good time to reflect on the underlying dynamic. (Thread)
A lot of the burn is attributable to DEXes, including @pangolindex, @SushiSwap and @Zer0Dex. These DEXes share a common feature: they constantly offer to buy and sell assets using the Uniswap equation. They are censorship free, and make a market for any asset.
By construction, these DEXes operate constantly provide arbitrage opportunities as prices move. Their bid/ask prices are modified continuously, by anyone, to reflect the market consensus on the price of the assets.
Today’s #FreeLoveFriday is about a topic that has been seeing a lot of discussion recently. Namely, I want to talk about Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in general, and to make it specific, I’ll focus on CryptoKitties.
First of all, there is the impression that NFTs were invented on Ethereum and that the Bitcoin community is just now getting in on the NFT game. This is not actually how it happened.
The very first NFTs were invented and issued on Bitcoin, by layering them on top of Bitcoin transactions. Among the most notable were NFTs centered around Pepe The Frog. I will leave dissecting the social aspect of Rare Pepes alone and focus on the technical side of NFTs.
The Avalanche network experienced a slowdown yesterday. I want to provide a short update on what happened, with a full analysis to be provided next week.
The Pangolin launch generated enormous activity, as I’m sure you’ve already heard. This activity triggered a nondeterministic bug in the network layer, related to caches, that led to a block validity check being skipped.
As a result, 57 X-chain to C-chain coin mint transactions were not subject to requisite checking in the client. This led to invalid minting of ~790.2 AVAX, corresponding to ~$40k USD, on the C-chain. It also caused the network to slow down. Nothing else was affected.
And it doesn't mean that the solution lies in public blockchains. All of the reasons why people wanted private blockchains saree still there. It's just that private chains clearly have too many downsides to pose a viable solution.
Not a single one of the private blockchain solutions that people have worked on has been deployed in a mission critical setting. The reasons are obvious. Private chains are:
- closed deadends
- don't integrate with exchanges, AMMs, etc
- consortia fall apart quickly