Oxytocin receptor (OXTR) expression patterns in the brain across development osf.io/j3b5d/
Here we identify OXTR gene expression patterns across the lifespan along with gene-gene co-expression patterns and potential health implications
[THREAD]
So, let's begin with some background.
As well as being an oxytocin researcher I'm also a meta-scientist, which means that a lot of my work on improving research methods is focused on improving oxytocin research (that's what got me into meta-science in the first place)
Earlier this year, we published a paper, led by @fuyu00, in which we proposed that three things are required to improving the precision of intranasal oxytocin research: Improved methods, reproducibility, and theory.
We used Tinbergen's "four questions" as a scaffold to develop this theory: how does oxytocin work; how does the role of oxytocin change during development; how does oxytocin enhance survival; and how did the oxytocin system evolve?
The theory was informed by lots of data on how the oxytocin system works and how it may enhance survival, but there's less data on how its role changes across development or how it evolved.
That's where this study comes in...
In a 2019 paper we reported oxytocin receptor expression patterns in the adult brain, which we linked to anticipatory, appetitive, and aversive cognitive states nature.com/articles/s4146…
So in our new study we used a similar approach to identify expression patterns across the brain (16 regions) AND across the lifespan (prenatal to 82 years old) via postmortem tissue from 57 human donors.
We found that OXTR expression begins to accelerate just before birth, with a peak level of expression occurring during early childhood (especially in males).
In particular, there was increased OXTR expression in the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus during early childhood
We also calculated the spatio-temporal correlation between OXTR and a geneset of interest from our previous work in adults, discovering a module of genes that co-express with OXTR both across the lifespan and across the brain (CD38, COMT, OPRK1, DRD2)
To assess the specificity of this result, we calculated the spatio-temporal relationship between OXTR and ALL available genes (n = 16659). The relationship with the dopamine receptor DRD2 was among the top 1.7% strongest relationships (b) and this was pretty stable over time (c)
To see if this pattern was a recent evolutionary feature, we performed the same analysis from rhesus macaque data across the lifespan, from the prenatal stage to early adulthood
Like our human analysis, we found an acceleration before birth, but no peak during early childhood.
We also did not find a strong relationship between OXTR and DRD2 gene expression, like we saw in the human data
Then, we went MUCH further back down the evolutionary tree using phylostratigraphy, which can identify which branch of the phylogenetic tree the original ancestor of a gene first appeared
As gene modules with high co-expression in the brain are related to molecular functions, we created a geneset containing the genes with the 100 strongest spatio-temporal correlations with OXTR
We found that most genes associated with OXTR expression are evolutionary ancient (the oldest phyostratum is cellular organisms)
We then calculated a transcriptional age index (TAI) for sixteen brain regions across five ontogenetic stages
to better understand the role of older vs. newer genes from this OXTR geneset module in brain development.
For all brain regions except the striatum (STR) and cerebellar cortex (CBC), the transcriptome of the OXTR top 100 geneset was older during the prenatal stage, compared to later stages
What also stood out here was that the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus (MD), which regulates decision making and behavioral flexibility, had a younger transcriptional age compared to all other regions from infancy to adulthood
To identify the source of this younger transcriptional age for MD, we calculated the *cumulative* contribution of genes from each phylostrata for MD, revealing that genes that first emerged during the 6th (eumetazoa) and 7th (bilateria) phylostrata has the largest contribution
What's interesting here is that complex nervous systems first emerged during the bilateria phylostrata and the differentiation of organs and tissues emerged during the eumetazoa phylostrata, in which eumetazoans used peptide signalling for cross-tissue communication
Next, we investigating the functional significance of spatio-temporal expression patterns of genes strongly
coupled with OXTR, finding enrichment in GWAS-derived genes for bone fracture in osteoporosis
Now bone isn't the first thing that comes to mind when it comes to oxytocin, but bone remodelling issues have been reported in autism, which has been associated with oxytocin system dysfunction pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17879151/
We also looked at the enrichment of this geneset in thirty tissue types across the body, discovering up-regulated differentially expressed genes in brain and lung tissue
So what are the health implications of the OXTR gene expression patterns across the lifespan?
To answer this, we extracted genesets from various psychiatric and psychological phenotypes
We found enrichment of the OXTR lifespan expression pattern in schizophrenia, IQ, general cognition, bone density, and BMI.
Finally, we confirmed that OXTR had high spatio-temporal differential stability from donor-to-donor (genes with differential stability scores in the top 50% of all genes are considered to be conserved) in humans and macaques
I wonder if non-fungible tokens (NFTs) could be used as a kind of prediction market for research studies that will be considered ‘classics’ in the future?
This could maybe motive more robust work?
And you’re wondering what the heck an NFT is, here’s an explainer
This paper has been cited 1163 times, except it DOES NOT EXIST.
This 'paper' was used in a style guide as a citation example, was included in some papers by accident, and then propagated from there, illustrating how some authors don't read *titles* let alone abstracts or papers
If you’re an academic you need a website so that people can easily find info about your research and publications. Here’s how to make your own website for free in around an hour [UPDATED 2020 THREAD]
This is the third annual edition of my thread tutorial. The big change for this year is that now I use Visual Studio Code (@code) instead of Rstudio. When I first starting making this updated tutorial with Rstudio I kept running into problems, so that's why I changed.
The other big change is that the website files will be hosted on @github, which makes version control and updating your site much easier. The actual site will be hosted on @netlify, and you'll make your site using the @wowchemy template
I'm taking a break from my own grant application by assessing other grant applications, because I'm a nerd like that. Doing this is providing a good reminder of the benefit of leaving some white space and including plenty of figures in my own application
Personally, I aim to have at least ONE object per page. This object could be either be a figure, text box, or table.
I’ve had a few people tell me you should leave about 1/5 of the final page blank to demonstrate that your project is so clear that don’t even need the whole page limit to describe it. That’s some 3D chess right there...
Our new paper describing recent advances in the field of intranasal oxytocin research has just been published in @MolPsychiatry 🎉 rdcu.be/b6jO2
We outline why we think intranasally administered oxytocin reaches the brain & highlight the work that needs to be done ⬇️
Was a pleasure working with Alex, @sallyagrace, @DirkScheele85, Yina, and @bn_becker on this paper, which we first proposed over a few beers at conference last year 🍻