It’s “psychological complicity” - and as in so many things in life leads to strange irrational outcomes.
Thus we’ve now reached a stage that Johnson could effectively do anything.
Because people’s belief that their single vote for Brexit was the right choice...must be saved.
3/
It’s why Brexit & Boris inextricably linked.
As its almost impossible to cognitively reject Brexit without first rejecting Boris Johnson.
(Altho the opposite is possible)
So the real battle is not Brexit, but 1st Boris Johnson.
People get this even if they don’t express it.
4/
I’m sure Boris gets this too.
It’s an amazing level of power than even Thatcher, who feared the ebb & flow of public opinion, ever had.
Boris knows that so long as he presents everything as patriotic Brexit vs remain he can quite literally get away with thousands of deaths.
5/
It’s why if rejoiners are smart - and this belief has been sorely tested a bit recently - they will concentrate on Boris Johnson before Brexit.
You cannot get people to reject Brexit before they reject Boris Johnson.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The former communist regions of eastern Germany are poised to overtake the economies of the majority of British regions.
While UK economy is generally only about 10% behind that of Germany in overall per capita GDP - something strange is happening below the surface...
2/
UK GDP looks good as an average - but figures are skewed by the powerful London & South East that together have a per capita GDP of € 50 000.
This is higher than 🇩🇪 national average. And as its where vast majority of opinion formers are based influences UK self-perception.
3/
However beyond London + South East, we start to see the UK is so unequal many of its regions are fast being caught up by the poorer ex communist areas.
Already in 2018 Sachsen overtook not only the structutally weak N. East & N Ireland...but Wales, Yourshire & East Midlands.
I see many confused why anti COVID restrictions protestors wear yellow stars.
It’s not because “they don’t understand” - it’s because they believe any slight inconvenience to their freedom - even if it protects thousands of lives - is worse than the death of 6 million people.
People need to understand why this is happening. There’s always been a type (usually a tiny minority of loner men) in society.
This isn’t like in the past.
The yellow colour isn’t by coincidence.
It’s full blown media mainstreamed narcissism.
Boris Johnson’s “Scotland policy” hit by UK govt infighting.
Little remarked upon further fallout of the internecine war engulfing Downing St is Johnson’s Union strategy.
In February when the “Union Unit” lost 2 leaders inside 3 weeks: Luke Graham, then Oliver Lewis..
2/
The chaotic “Union Unit” was effectively replaced as a political power by the creation of a special cabinet committee.
However as members were ministers, this invested power in the go-between who was chosen to steer this....who was none other than...
The aide chosen to help out on the “Scotland strategy” was none other than Carrie Symond’s “party pal” - Henry Newman. The only non govt minister (or even MP) involved with the Union committee.
So Johnson looks like losing a 3rd leading Union head inside 2 months.
Why the row about the @nationaltrust & “woke” is absurd.
The Georgians were not only consumed with woke subjects - they pioneered boycotts, woke slogans & even woke merchandise.
“Being woke” is nothing new.
It’s English history.
- a thread -
2/
From the mid 1760s on, that epitome of refined old world English conservative style Wedgwood started producing teapots.
But not just any old teapots.
But “Woke teapots”.
Teapots that would show you cared about the ills of the world & the suffering of those less fortunate.
3/
These “Georgian woke teapots” were chosen for an explicit reason.
Tea was a refined social event.
An event that women - who were deemed naturally more sympathetic - had some power.
Women - refined women - could show their commitment to ending suffering.
The premier league is a big money earner for the UK.
Huge TV money comes to UK and filters into local economy - not via profits as most clubs don’t make any - but via players, staff spending their salaries locally.
A franchise model would allow clubs to move elsewhere.
2/
What many fail to realise:
Most Premier league clubs never make a profit so the money they earn is “sticky” - it leaks out to players, staff, agents etc most of whom are resident in UK.
So for UK economy having foreign owners of non profitable clubs has been a huge benefit.
3/
But in a franchise system foreign owner could have huge incentive to take their clubs where the money is...rather than being the money to where the club happened to be when they bought them.