Joe Murgia Profile picture
25 Apr, 10 tweets, 2 min read
1 Pyramid? I didn't see no stinking pyramid in that video! WTF, Corbell?

Me: "Could u clarify. Do you know if people saw a pyramid shape with their eyes? Did it say in the report?"

@JeremyCorbell: "It was clarified, very specifically & in detail, that what we are observing in
2 JC: "that footage - used as an educational tool for our armed forces & for our intelligence communities - that what is being observed @ the ANGLE of observation, was triangle shaped, because of the angle. But indeed, these were pyramids. And they tried 2 make a HUGE
3 JC: "distinction, as these classified briefings were relayed to me, that these were not known stealth, or anything, as we know it. That's what it said in the briefing. So can I stand by anything other than that? At this time, I'm gonna say...no. However I WILL say that there's
4 JC: more "information that I hope the public will receive & let's find out. Look, as Lue said in his big conference, some reports are not gonna be correct. They're gonna be like normal, weird stuff. So I can't answer you definitely so I'm just not gonna. That's why I took
5 "so long to release the dates of the Omaha. Because even though it said it in the report, I account for human error. I triple checked, the exact, specific date. And I didn't say, 'around 11pm.' I said, 'It went into the water at 11pm.' So I'm telling you the best of what I
6 "know, Joe, and I think that we're gonna go further...we are going to go further soon."

~Jeremy Corbell

I'll link to the video once The Big Phone Home is complete.
7 And in response to Richard Dolan saying Corbell overhyped the video?

Corbell: "I didn't overhype anything. I didn't make up the word pyramid. This was in the classified briefing. I'm reporting that to you. Now you don't need to trust me. That's why I gave you the date of that
8 JC: "briefing. So anybody on the SIPR system or Intelink system...every correspondent in major news media, they've got insiders that can look at these classified systems. If I said anything wrong, they'll be able to tell you. Pyramid-shaped, unidentifieds...UAPs, swarming
9 JC: "the Navy warships. I didn't make that up. That was clarified, DISTINCTLY, that these were just observed as triangular-shaped from the angle of observation. So if you look at the slides I put out, I explain that."

~Jeremy Corbell

extraordinarybeliefs.com/news4/navy-fil…
Should be “definitively”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheUfoJoe

26 Apr
1 Will live tweet as much as I can w/tonight's C2C w/Knapp/Fugal/Corbell & Reuben Langdon (Citizens Hearing on UFO Disclosure). I'll only include new stuff. As I said yesterday, it's a great time to be alive, so if you're gonna complain about every little thing, go elsewhere.
2 Fugal went in as a skeptic. Within days, he put his own security on site & felt there was a 95% chance there was a natural/prosaic explanation behind the odd stories. 6 months into his ownership, his skepticism melted away as he & others had a world-view, changing UFO sighting.
3 Phenomenon is transient. EM anomalies are unpredictable. Had an @KSLcom crew in for the day from SLC & BF told them not to expect anything 2 happen. Sure enough, the ir drone fell out of the sky & gave a warning message the drone operator had never seen after years of drone op.
Read 37 tweets
25 Apr
1 @MickWest believes @chad_vfa41 shot FLIR video of another F-18. Underwood, who did NOT see the object w/his own eyes, shared his thoughts to @CBMDP in 2019.

Chad U: "The thing that stood out 2 me the most was how erratic it was behaving. And what I mean by 'erratic' is that
2 CU: "its changes in altitude, air speed, & aspect were just unlike things that I’ve ever encountered b4 flying against other air targets. It was just behaving in ways that aren’t physically normal. That’s what caught my eye. Because, aircraft, whether they’re manned or
3 CU: "unmanned, still have to obey the laws of physics. They have to have some source of lift, some source of propulsion. The Tic Tac was not doing that. It was going from like 50,000 feet to, you know, a hundred feet in like seconds, which is not possible."
Read 8 tweets
25 Apr
1 Why should I believe anything @JeremyCorbell says from sources related 2 military cases?

From C2C, May 21, 2017, 5 months b4 we learned about Tic Tac case @ TTSA event & 7 months b4 NYT article.

"There's a term, Anomalous Aerial Vehicles...off the coast of California in 2004,
2 JC: "there was an event where there was a deployment, and there were military pilots who engaged an object, or a series of objects, actually, over a series of days. I wanna make sure to find DIRECT witnesses & try to find exactly the facts. There was one pilot in particular,
3 JC: "and I have talked with him, but he has give me no authorization to talk about that. But there was an individual who was within a 100 feet of this thing and engaged it. It actually, actively jammed his weapon systems and radar systems. And briefly, for a moment, there was
Read 7 tweets
24 Apr
1 On The Big Phone Home, @LueElizondo says when he asked #ufotwitter what we wanted from the 180 Day Report, the number one request was...

DATA.

Lue mentions gun camera footage from another angle, data from multiple radars, etc...
2 Lue will release other requests we made in the very near future.

What will be released vs. not? Lue says Sources & Methods. (This is why I think our reps should be allowed 2 tell us what they're seeing during classified briefings. "An unknown craft made a 90 degree turn.")
3 Lue: Gov't says they don't want to talk about nuclear capabilities but via FOIA, you can see there are reports that show there's a connection. In the 180 Day Report, the good stuff will initially be classified but hopefully, be released to the public some time in the future.
Read 10 tweets
25 Feb
Bigelow on Joe Rogan. Three plus hours!

Rogan: Some r critical of Mack’s abduction research bc hypnotist’s can lead the witness.

Bigelow: Hypnotists try to lead them in the opposite direction.

Wish he would’ve said...many recall w/o use of hypnosis.

open.spotify.com/episode/4K3Q51…
2 They talk about the Phoenix Lights and Bigelow says it wasn't covered right away. Rogan disagrees. But Mr. B is right. Sighting happened in March 1997 and national media didn't catch on until June. I remember USA Today and network news (ABC) covered it on same day.
3 RB: You're not going to learn anything about UFOs from the vast majority of the scientific community, including NASA and everybody else. Too embarrassed, haven't done the research. Some will study it in private. Getting better than 20-30 years ago.
Read 84 tweets
25 Feb
1 So, ten people saw a close view of the Tic Tac Fravor engaged with: Fravor, his WSO, Female Wingman Pilot, Slaight (her WSO) & five in the Hawkeye. Seems like the Hawkeye folks were MUCH closer than the 2 (female pilot & Slaight) in the F-18 who provided high cover for Fravor.
2 PJ: "I also have spoken with one individual who’s involvement will remain very vague and who frankly didn’t give a damn about his NDA and told me things. I’ll keep my mouth shut about 95% of it though cause it’s not my place to share."
3 PJ: "For a long time, I had no idea where [the hard drive/data bricks] went after they were taken. I know now and it was exactly what I had suspected. The data contained on those bricks was dissected. Not sure by who, but if
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!