It's #Oscars day and whenever I think about The Oscars I think about 70's era films, 70's influenced films for some reason. I guess when I was growing up those were the "Oscar movies" so the ceremony always puts me in the mood to watch films either of or in that era. Today...
...before I leap into this screenplay I'm finishing, I'm going to watch, for the first time, SUMMER OF SAM. It's the Spike Lee I haven't watched yet, and I'm not sure why. Maybe because when I want to visit Lee, I miss this because it feels like DePalma to me...
...and I like DePalma's work, but not when I'm in the mood for Spike Lee. If that makes any sense. I'm in awe of movies like this, these lurid, sweaty, furious films. I've never written anything like that, something this sanguine.
This one is written by Spike, Victor Colicchio, and Michael Imperioli. I've ALWAYS been in awe of scripts like this. The seedy, ripped from the id, sexy, relentless cinema. The kind of script you imagine is written in a haze of cigarette smoke with sweat beads on a vodka glass.
I talk about imposter syndrome a lot, and what I wrestle with is that sense that a "real writer" is punching keys, birthing skin-you-alive speeches given by characters on hot concrete with a brown, @LexG_III sheen over everything.
That's REAL writing. I'm a milksop. LOL.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m finishing up a screenplay assignment this week, and here’s a workflow technique that I use for genre stuff...might be helpful.
I tend to write scripts that balance action/set pieces and dialogue scenes, with the hybrid scenes in there, obviously. My approach to action —
— is to not write it all out in my first draft.
What I’ll do is write it in paragraph form, within the body of the script and highlight certain things I know I want but most importantly I’ll have a sentence that tracks the CHARACTER GROWTH across the action scene —
— so I know how the character is growing. Then, when the draft is done I’ll make an action playlist and fill in the action.
I tend to move faster that way, writing out the meaty dramatic scenes and coming back to detail the action, like different parts of my brain.
Campbell is a version of structure. Aristotle is a version of structure. I don’t believe form is the inherent antithesis of quality, and once you get through a draft or even just a concept you have something you can rework into what’s unique for you.
The more you study the forms of stories, the more you see the parallels between them. Understanding those parallels and seeing those forms is very helpful.
What you do with that understanding makes the art.
Just finished a conversation with the director of a feature I'm producing, and here's a perspective from it that I've shared before. It might be useful for your genre #writing so I'll share it again for those that might have missed my earlier thread. It returns often in my work.
Often the problem of genre writing, especially in film, is that the stories are DEPENDENT on the genre elements for any dramatic impetus or conflict.
Great genre movies are dramas INTERRUPTED by genre elements, around the first act break. I'll explain.
DIE HARD is a drama about a marriage suffering from the imbalance of success for each partner and the cultural differences in relocation. John could just be in a drama about changing himself to fix his marriage -- but then Hans shows up and we're in an action film.
I don’t think critics liked it, but it blew my mind out of my ears as a kid. I was kinda raised by HBO (big surprise) and it was always on, or felt that way, but I loved it.
I saw the movie first so the concept of a box that puts makes you experience excruciating pain, while you have to use mental discipline to endure the pain or a future-witch will poison you with a metal finger blade.
Like what?!
I’m like barely double-digits years old and they hit me with folding space and traveling without moving?!
I watched Fraggle Rock that morning and HBO is like: astrophysics and hallucinogenic spice that send you to the astral plane!
One of the key aspects of a Trump supporter is the dismissal (and ridicule?) of anyone who didn’t vote for Trump. Empathy is not an aspect of Trumpism. Trumpism scoffs at empathy.
To be clear, philosophically, I’m on the side of reconciliation — to a point. It’s just incredibly difficult to be the shepherd to people that would set you on fire and throw you off a cliff if they could. The way she feels entitled to empathy she and her flock don’t have?
Phew
Close your eyes and imagine what these people would be like had Trump won. Imagine how much consideration they would have for people scared of him. Imagine what they would be saying on twitter. In person. At podiums. From their media desks.
Forgive me venting today. I’d rather be talking about synthwave, books and scripts I’m writing, things I’m directing but we’re at an inflection point in this country. We are fragile. This is where our attention needs to be. We need voices speaking up. We can’t normalize this.
I hear the woman who was shot has died. She died because the GOP found it politically expedient to empower a narcissistic sociopath as he tried to invalidate his election loss.
She died for nothing. For lies. For his ego. She’s never coming home.
This. Is. A. Cult.
Trump encouraged this DIRECTLY, despite whatever video he released today. His repeated legal failures and his lies about the election being stolen. The GOP coddled him then supported him.
Someone is dead because of it. Because people wanted to run in 2024 on this rage.