They didn't think to find out where their solar panels were coming from.
Or maybe they did.
Did you ever wonder why greens love China so much?
From the one child policy, to building an unstoppable torrent of solar PV cells and wind turbines...
China could do know wrong.
Greens didn't even mind the Chinese dumping PV on US/EU markets, destroying domestic production.
China really gets green stuff done fast.
Regulating human fertility... Mobilising the workforce... Abolishing human rights, democracy, rule of law.
It's not a coincidence. They're of a piece.
There was the @WWF, using taxpayers' money from @DFID_UK to fund illegal violent evictions, murder, rape, and torture of indigenous people.
Now there's UK firms established by eco-millionaire sustainability consultants to the government implicated in slavery.
Tell me that greens are 'ethical'. Go on.
"Oh, don't be unfair - nobody knew that there was forced labour!"
So, Mr Eco-Millionaire. What first attracted you to the one-party-state, famous for suppression of dissent & draconian regulation of fertility, from which you were promised commodities at a low price?
No point asking questions...
You can read all about Jeremy Leggett and his achievements -- apart from profiting from forced labour -- here... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Le…
Leggett was "Champion of the Year in promoting the green economy at the @BusinessGreen Leaders Awards (2014)"
"Leggett was a @CNN Principal Voice (2007) and served on UK government advisory bodies including the Renewables Advisory Board (2002–2006). He convened the UK Industry Taskforce on Peak Oil and Energy Security".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is no precedent for the deliberate immiseration of a population, such as that which is implied by #NetZero, without tanks and guns on streets, pointed at citizens.
Talk of using military 'intelligence' & force is about controlling domestic politics.
No statistics or ordinary metric of 'disaster', 'crisis', 'emergency' or even 'risk' support the claims that they exist. In many cases, they demonstrate the opposite.
Climate ideologues like Dessler play with words and numbers.
At least he admits it, eventually. Words mean whatever he wants them to mean.
I think 'disaster', 'crisis', 'emergency' and risk have very real meanings, which should not be toyed with by green propagandists. Desller is okay with misleading the public.
Unpack the framing, too... It is "anyone who says climate change is not a disaster or an emergency is expressing their values". But he does not take issue with anyone declaring a disaster or emergency.
This is "the personal is political", rescued from the 1970s.
I.e., let virtue signalling obscure awareness of your material interests, to let bogus grievance mongers and race-baiters award themselves endless privileges at your expense.
You might be a socialist black man, or a capitalist Asian woman. But Femi and this TikToker want to claim that the black man and Asian woman should not discuss their political ideas, only the colour of their skin.
In order to do this, they have invented the idea of political parties 'openly' {sic} representing racism/homophobia/misogyny.
This reduces politics to a battle between identities, to displace democratic contest between ideas about how society & the economy should be managed.
Within months of having been formed, XR were invited to give evidence to Parliamentary committees, and had an hour long meeting with @michaelgove, in which he agreed with nearly everything their said.
Here's XR founder Gail Bradbrook speaking to the @beisgovuk committee.