Although I knew it before, I learned all over again this morning why authors so often write their books sitting inside a fabulous library somewhere. I spend a lot of money on books but NOT this much!
2) Today's essay is constructed around Sharp's footnote numbers 8, 9, & 10. The bad news is that I was unable to find either free online PDFs or inexpensive copies of Deutsch or Machiavelli. The good news is I found a $1.20 version of Austin!
3) Sometimes, just having the paragraph before and the paragraph following a given quote transforms your understanding of the quote itself. It's more than just context, it's also momentum. What is the author's real goal, his destination? What are his values and assumptions?
4) As I mentioned yesterday, I LOVE the fact that Sharp has included Machiavelli. Not only is Machiavelli's The Prince located on my recommended reading list, I am steeped in his philosophy and have thought Sharp to be a fellow student of his for some time now.
5) Those who share influences share both values and modes of thinking. Not that he needs it but Sharp's use of Machiavelli raises his stock even higher in my book. On that note, let's get the technical stuff about book buying and access over right now, next...
6) Wow. That was a time hole. I did find and buy a copy for just $14. Very cool. But once I did so, I could not get the link to share it with you. There is great confusion at Amazon over specific translations. The Sharp indicated version is translated by Leslie J. Walker.
7) My copy is supposed to be delivered on Wednesday. Assuming success, I'll let you know if there's any additional context I discover on point. Again, I apologize for the effort required just to find the right copy of the book. Let's get back on actual topic, now...
8) “… who has the public as a whole for his enemy can never make himself secure; and the greater his cruelty, the weaker does his regime become.”
9) Machiavelli wrote 500 years ago. Livy died over 2,100 years ago. Our founders absolutely studied both these sources deeply. That's what makes all the arduous effort to win that knowledge back so worthwhile.
10) Turn now to Austin, undoubtedly another source our founders studied. Here's Sharp's description:
"...Austin described the situation of a dictatorship confronting a disaffected people. Austin argued that if most of the population were determined to destroy the government...
11) "...and were willing to endure repression to do so, then the might of the government, including those who supported it, could not preserve the hated government, even if it received foreign assistance. The defiant people could not be forced back into obedience and submission."
12) If you have ever wondered why so many schools from elementary through post-graduate have moved away from teaching our 1776 Revolution, look no further. That fighting spirit is precisely what must be suppressed for our current tyranny's benefit.
13) And now, Deutsch from 1953:
"Totalitarian power is strong only if it does not have to be used too often. If totalitarian power must be used at all times against the entire population, it is unlikely to remain powerful for long.
14) "Since totalitarian regimes require more power for dealing with their subjects than do other types of government, such regimes stand in greater need of widespread and dependable compliance habits among their people;
15) "...more than that they have to be able to count on the active support of at least significant parts of the population in case of need."
16) The truth is that freedom's history is one of stark clarity. As we have considered many times, its ultimate turning point was the founding of our nation, based upon the ideas, principles, the very philosophy of freedom itself. It is these ultimate values we're leaving behind.
17) How profound are these questions? How do we discover their impact upon our own individual lives, and the living reality of the institutions and organizations, the families we are members of right now?
18) I propose that, along with Sharp, we must replicate the knowledge and deep understandings of our forefathers. We must plunge into the very maelstrom of their learning, and the decisions and actions they took in order to pass our freedoms forward to us.
19) As we get to know Gene Sharp and his work better, we'll be discovering a man who literally carried the weight of the world's oppression on his shoulders, giving his entire life's work to empowering those oppressed to throw of the burdens of their oppressors.
20) We'll pick up the momentum of Sharp's work itself, with no further references to external sources tomorrow. And no matter what, we will prepare ourselves for the battle of our own generation, in order to pass America's freedom forward forever.
Thread ends at #20.
Become a fellow student of freedom with us at Telegram. No discussion could possibly be more important!
We won't have time to get today's analysis done in the morning. I hate that, but I will get it done later today. Diving in, we have two of the hardest passages of the New Testament to contemplate.
2) Here's a single verse to capture the horrendous point:
Luke 14: 26
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
3) If I have the time, later today, I'll look up this verse in Strong's Concordance and find the Greek or Aramaic word translated into the term "hate." Turning to the original language always helps. But, simply hearing it in King James English matters, also.
Once again, I'd change the Chapter title. I'd put "cometh" in place of "comes." For those who believe in Divine Law, power cometh from God. Nice King James feel, right? And what a question!
2) I haven't decided yet if I can get away with just one essay on this chapter, or if more may be needed. I can tell you this, you WANT to read along with me. Sharp is a strategic writer, and this chapter is a strategic turning point in the book.
3) While I read this chapter the 1st time some weeks back, I wasn't surprised but I was pleased that Sharp quotes my man Machiavelli. This is positively (maybe even dispositively) Sharp's true Machiavellian chapter. Had to look that up. Dispositive means settled, not in dispute.
I'd have named this chapter differently. I'd have called it:
The Strengths, Weaknesses, & Power of Negotiation
Names aside, this chapter is one of the finest presentations on negotiation I've read.
2) I can, however, make his case for the title he chose. Let me put the danger like so:
When Negotiation = Capitulation...DON'T DO IT!
For Sharp, political freedom is the greatest treasure in this world. It demands fierce commitment and readiness to make sacrifice.
3) My own case is this. Every form of combat or cooperation entails negotiations, whether we call them that or not. I say that if we're bold enough to embrace non-violent, legal, political resistance, then we can trust ourselves to negotiate without capitulation.
I was able to get my study in last night and identified 4 key thoughts to underline. Here are the shots of all 4. We'll walk through them below.
2) Dictatorships collapse when subjects confront them with adequate force. While they're often thought of as impregnable, they can't withstand concerted political, economic, and social defiance. Let's add, by non-violent legal means.
3) In the light of the Election Steal of 2020, it was hard for me to read this chapter focusing on my own county. The DC Swamp is 100% dependent upon our silent complicity, our complete complacency, that I just couldn't read this without my nation as a whole in mind.
Prefaces and Forewords are almost always written after the book has been completed. How do you know what you're going to say before you've said it? These two quotes are from Sharp's Preface.
2) Points:
* The prevention of tyranny might be possible
* Successful struggles against dictatorships could be waged
* And waged without mutual slaughter
* Dictatorships could be destroyed
* New dictatorships could be prevented from rising out of the ashes of the old
3) Points:
* The fall of one regime does not bring a utopia
* Hard work and long efforts follow
* The goal is more just social, economic, and political relationships
* The goal is the eradication of other forms of injustices and oppression
It wasn't a true read but not merely an advanced skim. I was able to take in both chapters 6 & 7 and now have the answer as to why they're two chapters, not one. Calculation played an important, if erroneous part.
2) As spelling is to reading and writing, counting is to calculation and mathematical analysis. I have suffered terrible capabilities in both spelling and counting for my entire life. Just yesterday, I demonstrated the same failure all over again.
3) I've made the precise same mistake before many times. Consider the page count in a chapter of a book. If, like me, you take the first page of the next chapter and subtract from it the first page of the previous chapter, you get an erroneous page count for the chapter, by one.