Let me just explain why you can’t find project details in the SAROs.
First and foremost, SAROs issued by DBM to cover releases to LGUs from funds under Allocations to Local Government Units are not always one is to one as in one SARO per LGU especially if it’s a barangay.
Now, the NTF-ELCAC budget is under Allocations to Local Government Units. How is that fund released
Normally, the department that has oversight on the implementation of projects request the release of funds from DBM in batches or tranches.
Each batch will have its own project list attached to the special budget request submitted to DBM. That request is reviewed by DBM before a SARO is released.
For example, this 3B fund release. DBM will never release a SARO without a project list that shows at least a breakdown.
DBM cannot do that under budget rules and regulations. Actually, even audit rules.
As to the project details per barangay, that is something that needs to be asked from the agency that requested the budget release in the first place.
That’s DILG.
Project details can never be found even in the actual SAROs because a SARO is not a project implementation document.
A SARO is an obligational authority. It’s the instrument that allows implementing units to award contracts.
You might be wondering why the SARO was released to DOF-BTr and not directly to the LGU or the brgy.
That’s because it’s the BTr that credits actual funds to the LGUs.
It is a “blackhole” not so much because there are no details in the SARO, but because the specific projects were never made public.
The project type, the location, and the amount for each of the barangays set to receive funds should have been included in the Annexes of the GAA.
That said, demand the project list and project details from DILG. Also demand the justification for the selection of barangays from NTF-ELCAC.
Remember that this is a fund for release to LGUs. This is a subsidy from national government. We cannot expect all the details to be written in the SARO itself.
BUT, when the SARO covers a bunch of projects listed in an annexed document, there is ALWAYS a notation in the SARO that the total amount pertains to the breakdown of projects in an attached list.
Okay, tapos na ang explanatiom about SARO. Defung NTF-ELCAC pa rin! Use it for ayuda!😡
Edit: Defund!
Pwede rin palang “defang” NTF-ELCAC🤣
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Also, shouldn't they be reporting their accomplishments since this is a pre-SONA briefing?
What's the point of reporting all these plans and targets if they don't support it with hard data to show how those budgets and investment benefitted ordinary Filipinos?
Look at this slide on the vaccination program. So what if those are their targets?
I mean, c'mon, we received 3 million doses and, @rapplerdotcom's vaccine tracker says 1.7 million has been administered.
And look how ACTUAL infra to GDP ratio has deteriorated since 2016? Hahahahahaha!
They were riding on the institutional reforms introduced by former DPWH Secretary Babes Singson. But well, well, well, they failed to meet their own sustain the momentum.
Heck, they couldn't even meet their own targets, better yet stick to those targets.. Hahahaha!
These were their medium-term targets at the start, published in no less than the 2018 People's Budget
I wonder where the Php673M figure came from. Maybe this is actual spending figure?
It's quite close to the OVP's budget for 2020 - nearly Php700M in the 2020 GAA - dbm.gov.ph/wp-content/upl…
It doesn't change the conclusion we can draw from this graph though.
Kahit Php900m 2021 OVP budget ang gamitin natin, or the 2020 OVP budget which is Php699.88m (to be exact), kapiranggot lang talaga iyon compared to the NTF-ELCAC funds.
2/x Anong mga kasama sa 568B? Basically merong mga fund releases authorized under Bayanihan 1 and 2 such as cash transfers ng DSWD, wage subsidies ng DOLE, those coursed through SSS and other COVID-related health and operational expenditures.