November 27, 2024: Our X/Twitter account (@threadreaderapp) got hacked and unrolls aren't working right now. We appreciate your patience until this is resolved.
1/14 The number one thing I continue to discuss with Celsius $CEL is how every intelligent individual, especially BIG money will eventually deposit in Celsius to earn yield. Why? Not because you can’t get yield elsewhere that isn’t novel. That’s possible anywhere, right? So why?
3/14 With Celsius $CEL since their business model isn’t based on Net Interest Margin & pay 80% Revenue to depositors it’s Y they lend out to U for nothing 0.7%-1% they earn their revenue from securities lending to Hedge Funds at 12-14% & Rehypothecate (lend out your collateral..
4/14 …(0.7-1%)+ what they receive for securities lending on it, which they share 80% of all revenue with the community via buying the $CEL token & other crypto, you essentially become the bank, never having to pay taxes out of your own pocket. It’s a self-sustaining system.
5/14 You get to borrow against your crypto at 0.7%-1% so U prevent from paying Cap taxes but U would need to pay taxes on your yield 1099 (ordinary income) “22%-37%”. Will use 24% tax (Income bracket $86,376-$164,925) just as an example.
So let’s say you have $1,000,000 in $CEL
6/14 U make 4.8% per year even if $CEL trades sideways, this will move to 7% based on how they are using the treasury to generate more yield over time but will keep with the current rate in this example. That is $48,000 per year in ordinary income 1099...
7/14 But you can borrow against your $CEL crypto at 0.7%-1%* cash (ideal as cash is a liability not an asset such as $CEL $BTC etc) to cover your taxes without creating a taxable event.
8/14 Example: $48,000 X 24% is = $11,520 in taxes, you borrow it against the $1,000,000 $CEL ... at 1% which is equivalent to $9.60 per month. Which is more than covered by annual yield. At $11,520 (LTV 25%) * 4 = $46,080 collateralized.
9/14
1,000,000-$46,080 = $953,920 * 4.8%=$45,788.16/12 = $3,815.68 per month minus interest of $9.60= $3,806.08 in green per month
Another way to understand this is that you are are the bank who is making NET INTEREST MARGIN. U are lending your crypto to Celsius for 4.8% $CEL ..
10/14 .. & borrowing at 1% means you would be still yielding effective rate of 4.56% Net Interest Margin based on locked collateral you aren’t earning yield on so ($3,806.08*12) = 45,672.96 So effective rate is ($45,672.96/$1,000,000) = 4.56% as shown above in the math. $CEL ...
11/14 .. You never have to ever pull money from YOUR pocket & pay taxes on capital gains or income. U have become the Bank & now understand why Banks make so much money. Cash is a liability. This does NOT work if you lock up all your collateral. Why U could buy more $CEL 💡...
12/14 ..No reason to ever sell assets, much less go into a liability such as cash that is losing purchasing power due to inflation.
Everyone will learn this in time. They will all want to deposit their crypto in Celsius $CEL . The closest competitor (if you can call it that is..
13/14 .. makes you pay 6% if you borrow against your crypto or 4.5% I believe at the very lowest. Can they fix this? Mathematically it’s very hard because NO ONE except Celsius gives 80% revenue back to community. The powerful value proposition no one discusses enough. $CEL ...
Timeline in which @BankToTheFuture led by @SimonDixonTwitt who has built a career around “financial inclusion” supposedly & helping smaller guy FAILED to protect interests of $CEL token who raised original money/equity
The $CEL token was a way to give “non-accredited” users access to the upside be it through a vehicle that was listed on #DEX (Decentralized Exchanges). Company pivoted for legal reasons to claim it’s purely a “utility” token & why they never listed on USA exchanges & Filed REG. D
Simon @SimonDixonTwitt & @BankToTheFuture knew this & were salivating 🤤 essentially get to legally claim equity in a business that was 2 years old & it would NOT hold up in the court of law as the $CEL token has no legal claim based on ICO in 2017, screwing the small investor in
I am always impressed with @otisa502 & have had many hour long conversations in the past 1+ year. Very intelligent.
I was very impressed with the hard questions he asked @SimonDixonTwitt not at all impressed with the answers he provided especially considering his confidence $CEL
Also, at no point was @otisa502 trying to defend Alex so stop with the #StockholmSyndrome shame tactics. Also, Otis has a far superior pulse on the Celsius community as a whole. He has been involved with almost all the meetings in community. I have been taken back by how
Poorly @SimonDixonTwitt has communicated with the community, particularly around $CEL token, fueling division but this likely is from not understanding how this has been how the community was so strong. We are were the best asset. Also, @otisa502 rightfully called out
As I have walked through life I have discovered some wisdom. A piece that at first I was resistant too. I grew up in a cult religion. I left the cult religion but I did not leave the light. I simply
$eGLD $CEL $SAITO
(2\31) realize that I was following a conceptual framework of GOD that was of a false deity. At first I looked to write new beliefs over my prior beliefs. This is the common practice of the pathological “positive” psychology I seen being passed around as wisdom. Often times we
(3\31) confuse positivity with happiness. Happiness is not about being blind to the negatives in our environment; it’s about believing we have the power to do something about them. If we simply layer “positive thinking” over faulty belief constructs rather than actually
(1\7) Dan,
There is no accurate or perfect answer to this question. W/ that said let me see if I can help to add perspective. *NFA I would say that Metabonding really allows you to get exposure to early projects that may have a high asymmetrical return. It helps
$eGLD $MEX $LKMEX
(2\7) to increase the diversity of one’s portfolio as well. If there are projects that end up becoming high quality blue chip projects, this helps to reduce your portfolio risk overall. As of now the LKMEX/EGLD LP Farm has a much higher % return than the Metabonding if I am
(3\7) correct. I believe this may be somewhat of an oversimplification as the % is a function of the level of participation in the specific reward system be it Farms or Metabonding, I believe. I think that one has to take into context this piece of information, as the % of
The Executive order of 1933 was when the USA abolished the Gold Standard & entrusted the private entity of the Federal Reserve to maintain the global financial system via monetary policy.This
(3\26) entrusted the Federal Reserve, leveraging the US banking system & US Govt. (Fiscal Policy) to print US dollars out of thin air in just the right amount to keep financial stability.
All wars have always been predicated around resources, money, control & power. The US
1/ Hi @charliemktplace this deals w/ the architecture of Blockchain to understand. On Elrond $eGLD tokens are built into the protocol NOT Smart Contracts. Read that again. Tokens are built into the protocol. This means the tokens are just like the core "Coin" like $ETH or $eGLD
2/On $ETH the tokens are NOT build into the protocol they are in fact (Smart Contracts). The Smart Contract represents the (Tokens - ERC 20) & #NFT's are the same way they are in fact (Smart Contracts - NOT tokens built into the PROTOCOL) (NFT standards: 721 & 1155) on $ETH This
3/ Means that you are exposed to the inherent risks of Smart Contracts that are coded to represent (Tokens ERC-20 or NFT's 721 & 1155). This means that malicious code can be put into a SMART CONTRACT that represents a token or NFT & sent to your Wallet. If you happen to interact