Adv Haris Beeran (for Petitioner): What we need as urgent measure is from May 18-45 going to be vaccinated. There is a considerable deviation from earlier policy. There are no free vaccines given to States. States will have to buy at an exorbitant price... arbitrary
Petitioner adv: Let it come on April 30, because May 18-45 vaccination starts. It is a v imp category. Differential price, my friend may be right that Supreme Court is taking. That is the suo motu matter.
Court: Whether your concern is also going to be addressed?
Petitioner adv: Only differential pricing was taken up (not aspect of vaccination of 18-45 age group)... let it come up on April 30.
Petitioner adv: Union Govt has gone for universal immunization, free of cost (earlier for polio etc.).. we cannot have a departure... a number of people in this category (18-45) are dying now. How can they be denied vaccination?
Another counsel rebuts: No one is denying. Whole country is on accelerated vaccination drive. How can they say deny?
Court: As regards pricing, will issue notice to the companies also. As regards the rest, government will have to answer
State Attorney KV Sohan also present.
Matter posted on first week of May for admission. Notice also issued to respondents 7 and 8.
#SupremeCourt hearing a PIL seeking an investigation into the death of Kalikho Pul, former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh in 2016.
Justice UU Lalit: You are not even aware of the stage of probe. How can a Article 32 petition be entertained here?
Justice Lalit: the person committed suicide 4 years before. You made a representation one year later and you have no relationship with the deceased. Either you withdraw or we will dismiss
AG Vijay Narayan: Both Election Commission and State Govt have seriously considered the suggestions made by Court. The Election Commission has passed a very detailed order dated April 28...
Court: Let us be very clear, the Election Commission has the authority to even take over the administration.. to ensure that COVID protocol is maintained ...
#BombayHighCourt refuses to take up the plea seeking directions to ensure that vaccine for COVID-19 is supplied at the uniform rate of Rs. 150 per dose for citizens across the country.
Chief Justice Dipankar Datta: #SupremeCourt has said issues which have pan India will be considered by them. Pricing is a phenomenon applicble all over India.
CJ: Since #SupremeCourt has taken cognizance before you filed the petition, you can approach them. You cannot keep filing petitions. We are alive to the situation and are hauling up the centre and state governments for providing better treatment to the people.
There's nothing much that can be done that this stage. Probelm appears availability of oxygen: Amicus in the matter, Senior Adv Rajshekar Rao on national allocation order
What is the status of the 2 plants were to be made operationalised. And what about other plants: Rao
Large chunk of Delhi population is seeking recourse to hospitals in neighbouring areas : Rao
The Karnataka HC to shortly hear a case registered suo motu after it received two letters highlighting various difficulties faced by COVID-19 positive patients in the State.
CJ Abhay Oka and Justice Aravind Kumar will hear the matter