Why has SA lost development momentum, asks Donaldson? Thesis he makes: SA took on a huge range of too many very complex projects simultaneously.
7 perspectives on development. 1. Tension between role of government and markets. 2. Overlapping and contradictory BEE policies. 3. State building: is it about building institutions or building expertise. 4. Integrity + Performance Mngmt between rules based systems and discretion
5. Hierarchical coherence of govt: few countries have been through the scale of reorganisation as SA has. Unresloved issues between centre and margins. When things go wrong, tendency is to recentralise.
6. Institutional Change and managerial interests: corporatisation of public entities incentivises to behave like private companies, esp in renumeration.
7. Fiscal sustainability: rising debt and limits to tax collection and cost recovery.
Where should we be going, asks Donaldson? We have to face complexity: multiple objectives and the conflicts between them, overlapping jurisdictions and incomplete decision rights.
Economically, we need to focus on narrower objectives: focus on employment. Schools assistance programme is coming to an end - makes no sense. SA doesn't follow through on strategic decisions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Conference misses a key question, argues Motsohi. Apartheid was a system of exclusion. That is at the root of it. Post-apartheid challenge was to set a strategic intent to serve larger South Africa.
Social Justice and Equity are the key strategic challenges of the public service. We haven't achieved this because organisations are not 'fit for purpose'.
Tompson says three areas of reform: making rules, applying rules and internal organisation. Task becomes very difficult when it comes to state regulating and reforming itself.
Key point: Reforms take a long time and a long time to prepare. More haste less speed. Crises are an opportunity for reform, but reforms only succeed if groundwork has already been done.
Momo: underlying state capture was a political narrative that pulled many good people by their noses. There were lots of red flags but people didn't ask questions.
National Treasury was terribly naive putting in place an accountability framework. Focused a lot on the sexy parts but not on the practical, operational issues and how people could get round them.
#FasttrackingReform Fitgerald says that there is no such thing as a depoliticised public service. There is much scope for deployment and political appointments.
To get public administration working we need to guide, direct and regulate politicisation, rather than try and abolish it.
Fitgerald says, by all means make political appointments. But regate them.