I agree with Prof. @JonathanACBrown & would also point out, along these lines, that another element that is woefully ignored is the decades-long support of right-wing Islamist forces by Western countries (US/UK/Israel) in a bid to counter nationalism & as a part of... 1/
Cold War politics. They engineered this wave of right-wing Islamism & then, in a morbid irony, switched to seeing the green crescent as the enemy when the same foe it was propped up against, i.e. the red sickle, was no longer seen as a credible threat & boogieman. 2/
I had always been aware of this connection but only recently have I started to understand the true extent of this link, thanks to a colleague who pointed me in this direction. The riposte to this idea is always to gripe about how it's convenient for Muslims to blame the West. 3/
But, a cold hard look at the facts on the ground reveals to me the reality that we don't actually do *enough* blaming where it is due. To explore this phenomenon, a good place to start for the interested reader is Robert Dreyfuss's book, 4/
"Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam." This connection can be further extended to the rise of ISIS, which is why this ex-Muslim/anti-Islam polemic is one that I have sought to problematize, as it seeks to draw a direct line from... 5/
the Prophet/Qur'an/Islam to ISIS, while ignoring/downplaying the historical & political factors that actually directly led to this phenomenon. A recently declassified US intelligence report revealed that the US, along with its Gulf allies, welcomed a "Salafist principality"... 6/
composed of Al-Qaeda elements in Iraq, themselves of course a result of the US's invasion of the country. All of this makes me think that we can hardly blame Arabs & Muslims for being "conspiratorial," when in fact these sorts of conspiracies have a long history. 7/
It's much easier to ask "What's wrong with Islam" & blame Muslims/Qur'an/Prophet. Ex-Muslim/Anti-Islam folks just serve to reinforce that simplistic narrative, devoid of any contextualization or nuance. None of this is to deny that genuine Islamic reform is needed. 8/
But, so too is it a reality that a viable alternative to right-wing Islamism had already existed & was ascendant in the region, i.e. nationalism, before US, British, & Israeli forces conspired to derail it & replace it with Saudi/Wahhabi backed Islamism. 9/
They created the very beast they now claim to be slaying. Even still, of course, their alliance with Saudi Arabia holds, as does their double-dealing & warmongering. "And when they are told, 'Do not spread corruption on earth, they say, 'We are but peacemakers...'" (Q 2:11). 10/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Javad T Hashmi

Dr. Javad T Hashmi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrJavadTHashmi

29 Apr
The idea -- that the Ḥudūd are meant only as a deterrent & almost never to be enforced in actuality -- is a fully mainstream opinion amongst traditional scholars, past & present, to such an extent that certain exemplary punishments -- including stoning & hand amputation-- 1/
were only rarely applied. I recall a claim made by Ibn Taymiyya, for example, that the stoning punishment had never actually been enforced based on witnesses alone (as opposed to self-confession) from the time of the Prophet to his time. I will need to dig this up... 2/
but Prof. @JonathanACBrown cites similar statements, including this: "In the roughly five hundred years that the Ottoman Empire ruled Constantinople, records show that only one instance of stoning for adultery took place... 3/
Read 11 tweets
29 Apr
Did someone pay you to throw me this softball? Well, thank you for teeing me up this way. Much appreciated! In point of fact, there is actual scholarship on this very topic & you should at least exhibit a cursory awareness of it, my friend. 1/
These statements are considered highly problematic & doubtful, & are almost certainly back-projections onto the Prophet & ʿUmar. They are put into the Prophet's mouth as a deathbed pronouncement, which you should know are very convenient & therefore of highly doubtful nature, 2/
especially when it counters earlier Qur'anic/Prophetic policy & just happens to line up with later highly crystallized theological views. But, of course, you won't take my word for it since I am a Muslim, so I would refer you to Harry Munt's peer-reviewed article on it... 3/
Read 28 tweets
28 Apr
Well, I think both discourses are correct since they are directed at different audiences, with different purposes in mind. One is directed internally & the other externally; both are correct & at play: 1) rioting & looting is generally harmful; 2) yet, they are understandable 1/
in the context of greater discrimination, unfair systems, socio-economic inequalities & injustices, etc. Ultimately, the video, made by the right-wing Daily Caller, gets both things wrong. First, the fact that many black people in the video opposed rioting/looting dispels... 2/
right-wing stereotypes of that community. Second, the statements made by the suburban white folks in that video were also reasonable & well-placed. Overall, the video may be food for thought but not as the Daily Caller wants us to take it. 3/
Read 5 tweets
28 Apr
These are not difficult questions to answer. As many modern hermeneuts have argued, we need to first determine what is essential & what is accidental to the Qur'anic discourse. You can well understand this from a verse you yourself would be keen on citing in regard to war. 1/
The Qur'an says to prepare against the enemy "steeds of war." The question arises: do we understand the "steeds" (i.e. horses) as essential or accidental to the Qur'anic discourse? It seems obvious to say that this is accidental, related to the contingent historical context. 2/
What is essential, meanwhile, is the overall message: be prepared against your enemies so that they don't attack you. This is what is transhistorical & universal in the Qur'anic discourse, not the specificity of "steeds of war." 3/
Read 16 tweets
27 Apr
Instead of issuing a long, drawn-out response, I've decided to just engage @XGONDALX & you here. Your first point is one that you continually bring up, which is your claim that I am "inconsistent" in my methodology in regard to Ḥadīth. But, in reality... 1/
It is you & @XGONDALX who are highly inconsistent & opportunistic in your methodology, including in this regard. Quite frankly, you will use any methodology or strategy, so long as it results in a negative image of Islam. This is apparent in your strategy to deal with... 2/
the Islamic sources. The great inconsistency of your work is that you insist on using modern secular scholarship when it comes to the recent findings on the Qur'an. These complicate traditional narratives, as you well know, & you (@XGONDALX) have made a whole series of videos 3/
Read 20 tweets
27 Apr
Your "thought experiment" can hardly justify that name & is unsophisticated truck driver-level rhetoric that does not befit you, at least from what I have seen elsewhere as far as your intellectual potential (which as yet has to be reached). It will take all of two seconds...1/
of thought for me to answer your challenge. You raise two simple points: 1) hand amputation & 2) sex slavery in the Qur'an. Both of these are ahistorical & decontextualized lines of attack. As for the first, it is well-accepted that the punishment of hand amputation... 2/
preceded the Qur'an & Islam: "Remarkably, not only stoning and hand-amputation, but nearly the entire range of Islamic adultery and theft legislation have pre-Islamic parallels" (Young 2005). As Islamic reformists have long argued, had the punishment of the time been prison... 3/
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!