An organism’s genome encodes the rules for how it looks, grows, and responds to the environment in a series of “A”s, “C”s, “G”s and “T”s:
The genes encode proteins – molecular “parts” that assemble into cellular systems. For example, we often depict proteins in metabolism as lines that interconvert chemical species inside the cell. These diagrams contain a lot of information, but can be difficult to understand.
In 2021 we have a LOT of sequenced genomes – over 300K for bacteria alone – giving us the protein-based “parts list” for many organisms. (below is from 2013, Bertelli + Greub). So can we use all of this information to understand how proteins work together to make living things?
This problem is hard for two reasons: 1) while some genes seem to be REALLY critical, deleting or removing other genes has no detectable consequence 2) the effect of changing (mutating) a gene often depends on genomic context and the environment – a phenomenon called epistasis.
So we need some strategy to quantify the relative “importance” of genes, and to map couplings or interactions between genes (epistasis). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF GENOMES to the rescue!
The idea is to gather thousands of genomes from different organisms and start comparing them (quantitatively). We follow two general principles. First, we expect that genes CONSERVED across many organisms are IMPORTANT to core cellular functions.
Second, genes which COEVOLVE (they show correlated changes in sequence and/or chromosomal location) are more likely to INTERACT. This schematic (from Maddison + FitzJohn 2015) shows two genes undergoing correlated changes (from white to black) along an evolutionary tree.
Using these two principles, we can start to build statistical models for proteins, pathways, or even cells…
Recently, very exciting work has been happening at the level of single proteins: using statistical sequence analysis to predict protein structure and function (see also Martin Weigt, Anne-Florence Bitbol, Olivier Rivoire, @sokrypton, @MorcosLab, @deboramarks, among many others!)
So can we extrapolate these protein-based models up to bigger systems? And what drives co-evolution at the level of pathways and cells? Are statistical models sufficient to design large protein complexes, pathways, and more? Let’s get sciencing! #EngageDBIO#DBIOTweetorial
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On a first glance, bacterial cell division may seem simple. In reality, it is the culmination of precisely orchestrated interplay between cytoplasmic and extracellular processes. #EngageDBIO#DBIOTweetorial
To divide, bacteria must: grow, replicate and segregate their chromosome, add new cell wall perpendicular to the old cell wall, and separate. That’s a lot of work! #EngageDBIO#DBIOTweetorial
@taekjip is taking over @ApsDbio today to run a tweetorial titled 'single is good but a couple is better'.
Single molecule methods are allowing direct detection of subpopulations & dynamics, and correlation between multiple observables, with rapidly rising popularity. Technical milestones in single molecule fluorescence can be seen here.
Many flavors of single molecule methods. (1) fluorescence (2) mechanical (3) electrical & (4) in silico. All four have been honored by Nobel prizes in physics, chemistry and physiology.
It’s Tweetorial Thursday, so time for a #DBIOtweetorial, brought to you by the fantastic #engageDBIO team! Guest this week @SulianaManley, on why there is “No free lunch in microscopy”
For biophysicists, microscopy is a major tool and an exciting outlet for innovation. If you are a microscopy user more than a developer, it can seem like a major new method is published every week! Even just considering localization microscopy ...
So, how do we make sense of all this method development, and what is driving it? Sometimes developers chase world records in spatial resolution, temporal resolution, depth, or long-term imaging.
Like a city, inside of the cell is organised by highways and roads (microtubules, actin), motors (dynein, kinesins, myosins) cargoes (e.g. receptors in endosomes, viruses) post-offices sorting cargoes (sorting endosomes), garbage clean-up (autophagosomes, lysosomes) and much more
Every piece of the puzzle listed above is a field on its own! We now know about the exquisite dynamics of microtubules, or how motors move. We know about the process of endocytosis at the plasma membrane and proteins that define distinct endosomal populations (Rabs)