Includes:
- A template for pre-mortems
- How product creativity dies
- False Positive Products
- Being more strategic
- B2B strategy primer
- Personal growth inhibitors
- Work stress
- Curated lists
- Internal roles
- Using logic
& much more....
👇🏾
A template that you can copy to run an effective (and fun) pre-mortem with your team for your upcoming launch (created via a collab with @coda_hq)
The hardest part of product creativity is not the ideation. It is the negotiation necessary to get the folks who are fixated on logic & math to appreciate the value of product creativity.
Most people will at some point get feedback that they need to be “less tactical and more strategic”. More often than not, the feedback giver offers no guidance on how you can *actually* do that. This tweet provides some pointers:
I thought this was interesting:
Twitter Analytics tells me that I wrote a total of 237 tweets & replies in Apr 2021. That’s the least number of tweets in any single month over the past 12 months.
LMK if the volume of tweets in April *felt* just right, too high, or too low.
If you've reviewed most of this content, would you kindly take a survey? (just 1 required question & 2 optional)
Short thread on the strategy questions you need to answer for B2B products:
(a strategy primer in 10 tweets)
Your B2B product strategy must rigorously answer these 3 questions:
1) What customer segments are we targeting?
2) What differentiation will we create for them?
3) How will we reach these customers?
It really is that simple.
No fancy frameworks or data deluge necessary.
But the answers to these questions do require deep insight into the market, org dynamics, buyer psychology, customer goals, tech evolution, and lots of creativity.
Reason #17 why PM is different at Megacorps vs. Startups:
At a Megacorp, you want to avoid False Negative Products i.e. products you *should* have built, but did not.
At a Startup, you want to avoid False Positive Products i.e. products you should *not* have built, but you did.
Am I implying that PM at Megacorps is "worse" than PM at Startups?
Or that the Megacorps that try to avoid False Negative Products (FNPs) are wrong?
Or that Startups must move slower to avoid False Positive Products (FPPs)?
Not at all
There is no One Right Answer for everyone
When you are a Megacorp, it is smart & rational to avoid False Negative Products (FNP), particularly in an area which could be a meaningful threat to your core business further down the road.
Why?
The Upside-Downside framework answers that for us:
Includes:
Solve THE problem
3 types of product leaders
Levels of product work
Getting work done
“I don’t know”
Good people, bad managers
Customer segmentation
LinkedIn Envy
On communication
Important definitions
Life-changing books
& much more..
👇🏾
A story that often plays out when we are not rigorous enough about the importance of the customer problem our product solves