Again, this is reactionary organizing. They are always on the defense, they need to be on the offense.
The big tent only exists because they’re constantly trying to appeal to people who are only a fraction on the fence about the GOP, and because of this, they run the risk of
The big tent only exists because they’re constantly trying to appeal to people who are only a fraction on the fence about the GOP, and because of this, they run the risk of
https://twitter.com/aghenis/status/1389002888375017472
Losing ground with progressives who are already not that enthused about having to vote Democrat every election.
That is the greater threat than possibly losing moderates.
They’re always compromising, and constituents see that as their greatest weakness. The “big tent” isn’t
That is the greater threat than possibly losing moderates.
They’re always compromising, and constituents see that as their greatest weakness. The “big tent” isn’t
Working and is actually shifting the party further right than before which is why people like Tim Scott and Joe Manchin keep getting elected.
They need to develop and invest in actual policy ideas and not move the needle to a compromise every time the GOP says “boo.”
They need to develop and invest in actual policy ideas and not move the needle to a compromise every time the GOP says “boo.”
Dems organize midterm by midterm, they need to think generationally.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
