In summation:
1. Dems’ constant ceding of ground on keystone policies while simultaneously telling constituents “what we need” strikes voters as disingenuous and performative.
2. “Blue” states are no less authoritarian and for the communities harmed, there is no difference
1. Dems’ constant ceding of ground on keystone policies while simultaneously telling constituents “what we need” strikes voters as disingenuous and performative.
2. “Blue” states are no less authoritarian and for the communities harmed, there is no difference
Which means those constituents won’t see any point in investing in Dems.
3. Dems greatest threat isn’t the GOP but the feeling of the futility of voting.
4. Dems organize midterm to midterm and via reaction. They are not seen as proactive or long planning which forces them
3. Dems greatest threat isn’t the GOP but the feeling of the futility of voting.
4. Dems organize midterm to midterm and via reaction. They are not seen as proactive or long planning which forces them
To position themselves as more “moderate” every time. Joe Manchin and Tim Scott are problems of their own making because of this. They wouldn’t have a “big tent” if they were cohesive.
Goodnight.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
