“International broadcasting can be defined as broadcasting across national frontiers to a foreign rather than a domestic audience. It is a deliberate dissemination of broadcast messages to an audience outside the
2/“borders of the broadcast organizations territory.”
[“Broadcasting is the distribution of audio or video content to a dispersed audience via any electronic mass communications medium.”]
“Broadcasters in one country have several reasons to reach out to an audience in other
3/“countries...
Governments typically have different motivations for funding international broadcasting. One clear reason is for ideological, or propaganda reasons. Many government-owned stations portray their nation in a positive, non-threatening way. This could be to encourage
4/“business investment in or tourism to the nation. Another reason is to combat a negative image produced by other nations or internal dissidents, or insurgents.”
“A second reason is to advance a nation's foreign policy interests and agenda by disseminating its views on
5/“international affairs or on the events in particular parts of the world.”
During the Cold War the American Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty and Indian Radio AIR were founded to broadcast news from "behind the Iron Curtain" that was otherwise being censored and promote
6/“dissent and occasionally, to disseminate disinformation. Currently, the US operates similar services aimed at Cuba (Radio y Televisión Martí) and the People's Republic of China, Vietnam, Laos and North Korea (Radio Free Asia).
The BBC World Service, the Voice of America,
7/“All India Radio & other western broadcasters have emphasized news broadcasts, particularly to countries that are experiencing repression or civil unrest & whose populations are unable to obtain news from non-government sources.”
PYONGYANG TOUR SERIES hosted by Un A and the My
8/Life In Pyongyang series are part of DPRK’s international broadcasting repertoire in the form of contemporary vlogging. Differing from VOA & CGTV in style, Un A & friends represent DPRK opening its heart to the whole world, inviting us in. And the West slammed the door shut.🤔
9/Internet Broadcasting techterms.com/definition/bro…
"Internet broadcasting is the distribution of content from a single source to multiple recipients. It is similar to multicasting, but does not limit the number of users. For example, a multicast may transmit a video stream to 50
10/"people, while a broadcast is available to all the users who tune into the stream. Most streams are considered broadcasts since they are not targeted to specific users."
The internet and social media facilitate vlogging, which is uploaded to a website and available to any who
11/visit the website. Is it surprising that DPRK has appropriated Western social media (YouTube) and Chinese Weibo to make inroads to foreign audiences? I'm not surprised at all. In fact DPRK has injected SOCIALISM into SOCIAL media! DPRK social media then sidesteps broadcasting.
Return of the Foreign Ministry: Choe Son Hui’s Message to the US 38north.org/2021/03/return…
The channel for interaction with Washington once again will be DPRK’s Foreign Ministry, and that means dealing w/ a very cool lady: seasoned high-ranking diplomat Ms Choe Son Hui.
2/“First Vice Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui issued a statement on March 18 focusing on the current state of US-DPRK relations…Choe’s comments suggests, first and foremost, that the Foreign Ministry is preparing to become the channel for interaction with Washington once again…
3/"The key formulations are laden with qualifiers that reinforce that point. A few examples that indicate the game is only beginning include (note in all case, emphasis is added):
▪“We have already declared our stand that no DPRK-U.S. contact and dialogue of any kind can be
"[T]he nuclear deterrent is a deterrent. It’s an effective deterrent, and that its rationale - to defend the national security of the DPRK and the security of the Kim regime and the Korean Workers’ Party. So the root of this is North Korean insecurity."
2/Excerpts & Commentary:
Soo Kim (11:24): “So I don’t think the regime is going to need an external impetus to embolden its resolve.”
[Hasn’t the DPRK already “resolved” that since the US continues to remain “hostile”, it has to beef up its nuclear deterrence? Yes, it has. They
3/are watching every move Washington makes. Ms Choe Son Hui of DPRK's Foreign Ministry has spelled out clearly where DPRK currently stands:
“We already clarified that we will counter the U.S. on the principle of power for power and goodwill for goodwill.” 38north.org/2021/03/return…
So the North Korea Policy Review is complete, but it's classified, so we, and Pyongyang, can only guess what it is? And now the Biden Admin is waiting on DPRK to see if they're willing to engage? Is that "diplomacy"? Not quite. It's less "real" than the fictional plot of "The
2/Americans":
3/Who did the Biden Admin consult with besides past admin officials? US intel? CIA? US military? I bet they think DPRK is a really tough "nut to crack". How can anyone know anything about the "closed society" of the "hermit kingdom" presided over by a "ruthless dictator" who
“Hopefully, the administration will build on the diplomatic progress made over the past four years instead of jettisoning everything from the Trump years — but come up with a long-term strategy that takes all stakeholders in the region into account.” voanews.com/east-asia-paci…
2/"Though it is not clear what “something” each side would offer, there are many options.
During Trump’s outreach to Kim, U.S. officials reportedly considered declaring a formal end to the Korean War, a symbolic step that would signal a less pressure-focused approach. Both
3/"sides also considered establishing liaison offices in each other’s countries.
U.S. officials could also try to formalize North Korea’s pause on nuclear and long-range missile tests. Or they could attempt to work out a more extensive interim deal to limit North Korea’s
@JoeBiden @POTUS @WhiteHouse @PressSec
Hello. Biden Admin's North Korea Policy Review is done but it HASN'T BEEN REVEALED right? Pyongyang is freaking out, misreading the tea leaves. If Biden is serious about a new "phased approach" building on Singapore, REVEAL THE POLICY!!!
I've already critiqued what I've gleaned from Jen Psaki's comments and this WP piece 👇and found Biden's NK Policy Review deserving of a B. Don't make me change my grade.😉 You, uh, ARE going to tell America & world what it is, right?
3/Pyongyang obviously didn't catch the Washington Post piece (which I presume is accurate). So they don't know that Biden is focussed on "denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" and wants to build on Singapore. I believe they can work w/ that - But not before you tell them!!
Check out the incredible video montages created by MetalGuruMessiah as visual accompaniments to some of the great, creative & memorable rock songs of the not too distant past!
Once Upon A Time In The West - Dire Straits (1979) via @YouTube
2/(Don't Fear) The Reaper - Blue Öyster Cult (1975) 4K UHD via @YouTube
3/Shine On You Crazy Diamond (Parts I-IX) - Pink Floyd (1975) via @YouTube
Video is a videographic ode to Syd Barrett who “co-founded Pink Floyd in 1965 [and] was their original frontman and primary songwriter”. The song itself is homage to Syd.