Some of the defamation of @Alliancelgb (the nonsense that it is “hateful”, the lie about rightwing funding etc) is clearly part of an effort to discredit LGBA instead of engaging with its concerns. But today I came across a tweet that initially had me stumped./1of5
What was this person talking about? Most people thought the tweet was anti-lesbian. But the person calls herself a butch lesbian. Suddenly I realized: she thinks LGBA is straight men pretending to care about lesbians in order to express what she misinterprets as transphobia./2of5
How strange! She doesn’t know that LGB Alliance was founded by lesbians, long-time gay & lesbian rights activists, or that over half of the people who work for it (all as volunteers) and its supporters are lesbians. She is unaware that lesbian erasure is causing real misery./3of5
She has clearly never seen or heard any of the interviews in which Kate and I explain why we founded LGB Alliance, what LGBA stands for, what it does, and its plans for the future. But false rumors are spread, and some of them stick. That is the unfortunate side of Twitter./4of5
Most of the detractors of LGB Alliance are well-meaning but ill-informed. The only way to fight ignorance is with knowledge. With respectful engagement. There’s no other way./5of5

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bev Jackson

Bev Jackson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BevJacksonAuth

7 May
Everyone who has understandably been focusing on Covid, the environment, the economy and numerous other issues may have missed the strange debate going on about sex and gender.
When we assert the incontrovertible fact that there are two sexes (something of which every lesbian looking for a sperm donor is acutely aware), we face accusations of “transphobia”.
When we stated in an ad that a lesbian is an adult human female attracted to other adult human females we were accused of “transphobia”.
Read 7 tweets
22 Jan
I cheered to see the results of the US election. It was an enormous relief (as many Republicans agreed) to see the defeat of Trump. An enormous relief for the environment; /1
An enormous relief for all those desperate for COVID relief and a centralized vaccination and testing program; /2
An enormous relief for undocumented immigrants, who have been living in fear; /3
Read 10 tweets
12 Oct 20
@StemopeenVrouw Volgens @StemopeenVrouw is iedereen die zich identificeert als vrouw een vrouw. (En omgekeerd een man, neem ik aan). Geen discussie. Dit betekent dat de definitie van “vrouw” naar binnen worden verplaatst, naar een persoonlijk gevoel, in plaats van objectieve werkelijkheid. /1of2
@StemopeenVrouw Als er geen vrouwen zijn die objectief als zodanig kunnen worden beschreven, zijn er geen #vrouwenrechten meer. Er is in Nederland geen linkse vrouwenbeweging die deze elementaire waarheid begrijpt. In de VK gelukkig wel. Vrouwen van #Nederland, word wakker!/2of2
Read 5 tweets
9 Feb 20
What Graham says here, “I didn’t think I’d have to talk about it long. I thought others would see this was obviously wrong, and step in” rings true. I remember thinking it several times.
I thought it about athletes with male bodies taking part in women’s sporting events. “Well, people who know about sport will soon point out that that is completely unfair and put a stop to it”!
I thought it when I first heard the cotton ceiling rhetoric: “Well, all women, and certainly all lesbians, will immediately identify this as homophobic and misogynistic and rise up in fierce opposition!”
Read 6 tweets
22 Sep 19
Our letter in today’s Sunday Times
“GAY PEOPLE LOSING FAITH IN STONEWALL
Last October a group of LGB rights supporters asked Stonewall to “commit to fostering an atmosphere of respectful debate rather than demonising as transphobic those who wish to discuss,/2
or dissent from, Stonewall’s transgender policies”. Since then, Stonewall has refused repeated requests to enter into any such dialogue.
The government continues to treat Stonewall as if it represented the views of progressive thinking in general, and specifically LGB opinion./3
It does not. We believe it has made mistakes in its approach that undermine women’s sex-based rights and protections. The most worrying aspect of this is that all primary-school children are now challenged to review their “gender identity”/4
Read 10 tweets
22 May 19
So. After @ruth_hunt’s interview with @GuardianAnushka I tweeted on 30 April: “Ruth, I listened with interest and noted your call for a civil discussion. I agreed with many points while others perplexed me. Are you willing to engage, e.g. by email?
I am really interested in your replies to my questions. I am committed to civil debate.” She tweeted back: “Sure, drop us an email. Info@stonewall.org uk.”
So I did. It’s certainly a long letter with lots of questions, but no one could say it’s not civil.
To this day she has neither replied nor acknowledged it. So here it is. I’ll make it into a proper thread at the end. "1 May 2019
Dear Ruth,
Thank you for being willing to engage.
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(