Everyone who has understandably been focusing on Covid, the environment, the economy and numerous other issues may have missed the strange debate going on about sex and gender.
When we assert the incontrovertible fact that there are two sexes (something of which every lesbian looking for a sperm donor is acutely aware), we face accusations of “transphobia”.
When we stated in an ad that a lesbian is an adult human female attracted to other adult human females we were accused of “transphobia”.
This is not an obscure dispute within the land of LGBT. It affects everyone. It’s about the difference between facts and beliefs/feelings. It’s about a wholesale effort to rebrand the women’s and LGB rights movements as “transphobic”.
Even this wouldn’t matter if it was an obscure group of shrill campaigners. It’s not. Those prioritizing a feeling called “gender identity” over biological reality are being supported by official institutions and human rights agencies everywhere.
Women’s rights matter. The rights of people with same-sex sexual orientation matter. It is outrageous to see any discussion of women’s or LGB rights being branded as “hateful”. If these rights matter to you, please get informed.
If you have changed your position from being pro the focus on gender identity to a more gender critical point of view, please say in the replies what books, talks, documentaries etc helped to change your mind.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some of the defamation of @Alliancelgb (the nonsense that it is “hateful”, the lie about rightwing funding etc) is clearly part of an effort to discredit LGBA instead of engaging with its concerns. But today I came across a tweet that initially had me stumped./1of5
What was this person talking about? Most people thought the tweet was anti-lesbian. But the person calls herself a butch lesbian. Suddenly I realized: she thinks LGBA is straight men pretending to care about lesbians in order to express what she misinterprets as transphobia./2of5
How strange! She doesn’t know that LGB Alliance was founded by lesbians, long-time gay & lesbian rights activists, or that over half of the people who work for it (all as volunteers) and its supporters are lesbians. She is unaware that lesbian erasure is causing real misery./3of5
I cheered to see the results of the US election. It was an enormous relief (as many Republicans agreed) to see the defeat of Trump. An enormous relief for the environment; /1
An enormous relief for all those desperate for COVID relief and a centralized vaccination and testing program; /2
An enormous relief for undocumented immigrants, who have been living in fear; /3
@StemopeenVrouw Volgens @StemopeenVrouw is iedereen die zich identificeert als vrouw een vrouw. (En omgekeerd een man, neem ik aan). Geen discussie. Dit betekent dat de definitie van “vrouw” naar binnen worden verplaatst, naar een persoonlijk gevoel, in plaats van objectieve werkelijkheid. /1of2
@StemopeenVrouw Als er geen vrouwen zijn die objectief als zodanig kunnen worden beschreven, zijn er geen #vrouwenrechten meer. Er is in Nederland geen linkse vrouwenbeweging die deze elementaire waarheid begrijpt. In de VK gelukkig wel. Vrouwen van #Nederland, word wakker!/2of2
What Graham says here, “I didn’t think I’d have to talk about it long. I thought others would see this was obviously wrong, and step in” rings true. I remember thinking it several times.
I thought it about athletes with male bodies taking part in women’s sporting events. “Well, people who know about sport will soon point out that that is completely unfair and put a stop to it”!
I thought it when I first heard the cotton ceiling rhetoric: “Well, all women, and certainly all lesbians, will immediately identify this as homophobic and misogynistic and rise up in fierce opposition!”
Our letter in today’s Sunday Times
“GAY PEOPLE LOSING FAITH IN STONEWALL
Last October a group of LGB rights supporters asked Stonewall to “commit to fostering an atmosphere of respectful debate rather than demonising as transphobic those who wish to discuss,/2
or dissent from, Stonewall’s transgender policies”. Since then, Stonewall has refused repeated requests to enter into any such dialogue.
The government continues to treat Stonewall as if it represented the views of progressive thinking in general, and specifically LGB opinion./3
It does not. We believe it has made mistakes in its approach that undermine women’s sex-based rights and protections. The most worrying aspect of this is that all primary-school children are now challenged to review their “gender identity”/4
So. After @ruth_hunt’s interview with @GuardianAnushka I tweeted on 30 April: “Ruth, I listened with interest and noted your call for a civil discussion. I agreed with many points while others perplexed me. Are you willing to engage, e.g. by email?
I am really interested in your replies to my questions. I am committed to civil debate.” She tweeted back: “Sure, drop us an email. Info@stonewall.org uk.”
So I did. It’s certainly a long letter with lots of questions, but no one could say it’s not civil.
To this day she has neither replied nor acknowledged it. So here it is. I’ll make it into a proper thread at the end. "1 May 2019
Dear Ruth,
Thank you for being willing to engage.