1/n
$FSLY
* Revenue: $85M vs $85.18M analysts
2021 Full Year guidance
* $385M vs $377M
$FSLY
* Revenue: $85M vs $85.18M analysts
2021 Full Year guidance
* $385M vs $377M
2/n
$FSLY
CORRECTION ON EPS
* Revenue: $85M vs $85.18M analysts
* EPS: -$0.12 vs -$0.10 (prev wrote -$0.06)
2021 Full Year guidance
* Revenue: $385M vs $377M
* EPS: -$0.39 vs -$0.40
$FSLY
CORRECTION ON EPS
* Revenue: $85M vs $85.18M analysts
* EPS: -$0.12 vs -$0.10 (prev wrote -$0.06)
2021 Full Year guidance
* Revenue: $385M vs $377M
* EPS: -$0.39 vs -$0.40
6/n
$FSLY
Actually there is a lot in the letter to shareholders, like this:
Revenue would have been $86.5M which would have been a beat if not for a write down from SS.
Also...
$FSLY
Actually there is a lot in the letter to shareholders, like this:
Revenue would have been $86.5M which would have been a beat if not for a write down from SS.
Also...
7/n
$FSLY
If we look at expected EBITDA loss for Q1 Q2 and full year along w rev by Q and full year, they are forecasting serious acceleration in growth in the back half both in revenue and profitability.
The result is a beat for both for full year, but a miss for Q1/2.
$FSLY
If we look at expected EBITDA loss for Q1 Q2 and full year along w rev by Q and full year, they are forecasting serious acceleration in growth in the back half both in revenue and profitability.
The result is a beat for both for full year, but a miss for Q1/2.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
