Wow. Chris Krebs blocked me for pointing out gaping holes in his “most secure election” testimony. Hint. The bar was astonishingly low. 1/
https://twitter.com/jennycohn1/status/1390020136782876673
2/ The presidential race was heavily scrutinized but most unexpected Democratic losses down ballot were not audited meaningfully fully or at all. Most likely not at all. Due to his overbroad testimony, efforts to require meaningful manual audits for all federal races have stalled 
3/ Why bother w/ election security legislation if Chris Krebs says the voting system is already secure? All we need is one man’s word, right? No need for dumb audits after all! 😡
4/ Frankly I’m pissed. I provided facts with sources about our country’s failure to audit races meaningfully or at all and he blocks me rather than explain why I’m wrong. Because I’m not wrong.
5/ Not a great look, Chris Krebs.
6/ Not a great look either. He later claimed that his office advised people orally (not in writing) to remove the modems.
7/ How cld the election have been so secure after this?! How is this not a legitimate question?! axios.com/gop-senator-el…
8/ from early 2020 nbcnews.com/politics/elect…
10/ “‘We missed it … a bunch of other folks missed it,’ said Krebs, explaining that the hack [on the fed govt] was possible bc of outdated systems across government agencies that have not been ‘optimized’ to proactively defend against unknown attacks.” forbes.com/sites/jemimamc…
11/ “Krebs, who was director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency when the cyberattack is thought to have begun, as early as March, said that he was not aware of the hack until it was detected by cybersecurity firm FireEye earlier this month.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
