How important is global capital for growth in developing countries?

Not as much as it is traditionally hyped in theory and practice

The reason?

Global capital is a double-edged sword. Its promise versus its perils must be carefully adjudicated

(thread)
Correlation is not causation, but a useful fact to keep in mind is that developing countries with higher capital inflows tend to have *lower* growth

Countries like China with very low or negative net inflow tend to have the highest growth rate
So should countries just ban capital from coming in?

Of course not.

The key is understanding what kind of capital is healthy versus unhealthy for the economy

kind of like figuring out healthy versus unhealthy food for the body
Global capital that goes in and out of developing countries quickly (portfolio flows, short-maturity debt) and capital that finances non-tradable sectors like real estate are examples of unhealthy capital
A large share of global flows can be of the unhealthy kind

And such global capital can be fickle

whiplashing the economy as it surges in and then out, often at inconvenient times as this terrific paper summarizes

helenerey.eu/AjaxRequestHan…
Developing countries need intelligently designed prudential policies, e.g. capital controls, to protect themselves from the unhealthy capital

So what is healthy global capital?

It is the type of FDI that brings in new technology and skills that raise domestic productivity
One way to think of healthy global capital is that countries are not importing capital, but rather technology and know-how

the capital is necessary only to give foreigners "skin in the game", so they work hard to boost domestic productivity
China essentially followed this playbook during the 90s and beyond, welcoming FDI in high-productivity sectors, while restricting other types of flows
Finally, once an economy develops sufficiently, its diet can change.

For more, you can watch my 30-minute presentation on "the promise and peril of global finance for development" given @CGDev

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Atif Mian

Atif Mian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AtifRMian

23 Mar
Today's question for #WhyStudyEconomics

Should we provide relief to debtors when there is a recession, such as in this pandemic or the housing crisis before that?

The answer illustrates how good economics is about making the sum bigger than its parts
Each debtor has a lender. So providing relief to the debtor means we are taking something away from the lender

Isn't this a zero sum game then?

Why provide relief to the debtor at the expense of the lender?

Economics tells us that this apparently simple logic is incorrect
The reason: In the midst of a recession, demanding an additional dollar from a debtor takes away one dollar from their total spending

But giving the same dollar to the lender does not add this dollar back into total spending, because lenders try to save some portion of it
Read 10 tweets
19 Mar
I'll do occasional thread on #WhyStudyEconomics - explaining how this science can be used for our collective good when used properly

Today's question: Should we have a minimum wage?
Questions in economics are social in nature which can understandably trigger an ideological/emotional response

But one must resist that initial temptation and start with a formal framework to think objectively about the question at hand

This is what theorists try to do
For a question on the minimum wage, we must start with a theory of how labor market works

A theory does not tell us how labor markets *actually* work, but it guides us by spelling out conditions under which a minimum wage is desirable versus not
Read 13 tweets
25 Feb
The administration is reviewing U.S. economic resilience - this is much needed

Why is it necessary? And how should one do it?
Resilience => ability to absorb "shocks" such as disruptions in microchips or bursting of a bubble without major layoffs

An inability to do so is very costly. This study by @ojblanchard1 @LHSummers & Cerutti shows that short-run losses often become more permanent Image
So how can we make the U.S. economy more resilient?

There are two sides to it (as always)

The supply-side and the demand-side

The administration is currently focusing on the supply-side
Read 7 tweets
30 Jan
GameStop is an interesting story, but there is a bigger and much more serious question about financial markets

As someone who studies finance, I know finance has tremendous potential to benefit society

But there is something serious to worry in the trend since the 80s
Let's start with the story we like to tell students in finance 101

"financial markets take money from savers and give it to entrepreneurs who invest it to make economic growth possible"

This is indeed a very important function of financial markets

However ....
Since the 80s financial market has increasingly been doing something quite different

The size of financial sector has almost *doubled* in terms of credit given out per $ of output

Yet, investment has not risen at all and in fact been trending down
Read 7 tweets
19 Jan
US needs a strong immigration policy to reverse the long-run decline in growth

To understand the argument, we'd need to get a bit into growth accounting

20 year growth rate just before the pandemic was at its lowest since WWII (black line)
Growth can be decomposed into growth in hours people work (red line) and productivity growth (blue line)

Both components are also at their lowest, but decline in hours growth is the steepest. Why?

A combination of two factors:
(i) the big run-up in women entering the labor force is maturing out

(ii) work force is aging / fertility rate declining. In fact, U.S. fertility rate is now well below replacement

So red line will continue to push growth downwards
Read 6 tweets
4 Jan
The Covid-19 recession is the strangest recession in living memory

For starters, it is the most unequal recession - like the virus, decimating some and untouching others.
It is also the most global, with practically all countries going down at the same time
The most unequal recession comes at a time when the world was already most unequal in living memory
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(