How important is global capital for growth in developing countries?
Not as much as it is traditionally hyped in theory and practice
The reason?
Global capital is a double-edged sword. Its promise versus its perils must be carefully adjudicated
(thread)
Correlation is not causation, but a useful fact to keep in mind is that developing countries with higher capital inflows tend to have *lower* growth
Countries like China with very low or negative net inflow tend to have the highest growth rate
So should countries just ban capital from coming in?
Of course not.
The key is understanding what kind of capital is healthy versus unhealthy for the economy
kind of like figuring out healthy versus unhealthy food for the body
Global capital that goes in and out of developing countries quickly (portfolio flows, short-maturity debt) and capital that finances non-tradable sectors like real estate are examples of unhealthy capital
A large share of global flows can be of the unhealthy kind
And such global capital can be fickle
whiplashing the economy as it surges in and then out, often at inconvenient times as this terrific paper summarizes
Questions in economics are social in nature which can understandably trigger an ideological/emotional response
But one must resist that initial temptation and start with a formal framework to think objectively about the question at hand
This is what theorists try to do
For a question on the minimum wage, we must start with a theory of how labor market works
A theory does not tell us how labor markets *actually* work, but it guides us by spelling out conditions under which a minimum wage is desirable versus not