When a society surrenders its most fundamental right to defend itself entirely to the State,hands over all its institutions to the State,and puts all its eggs in the political basket,it is bound to be orphaned and deprived of all its defenses. Case in point - The Hindu society.
The next time some colonialised idiot tells you why d State should run Hindu Temples or underestimates d need for decentralised Temple management bcoz "muh normative structures for Hindu unity bro",tell him he doesn't have the first clue of Bharat’s Temple management history.
Let these "normative" idiots take their BS to non-Brahminical Temple management structures in any part of Bharat & let's see if they come back with their faces intact.They understand jack about Temple management history but d arrogance with which they hold forth on it is amazing.
But they won't pause for a moment & ask if their rootless deracinated blather makes sense. Why? Oh because they have a normative vision. OK what is that vision based on? Facts? History? Or just the opinion of a clique which is sought to be imposed on all? Oh yes Unity.
You think there is unity between Christian denominations? You shud see them fight for territories. You think the Muslim society is united? Just look at the Middle East or even within Bharat. What unites ppl is the identification of the out-group, not some vague normative BS.
When you lack the guts to identify the out-group just because you have single handedly muddled the definition of who is a Hindu, you will waffle all over the countryside about Hindu unity and go about destroying every Dharmic structure, whether you understand it or not.
To fight for respect for every group within the Dharmic fold shud be the goal as opposed to destroying select identities under the facade of unity because clearly you don't have the guts to destroy all identities. After all, some are more politically important than others.
The more I read history d more I am convinced that certain issues need to be addressed head on but the solution simply isn't to throw the baby out with the bathwater. That is the solution of the unimaginative & ignorant idiot & what makes him dangerous is his normative certitude.
Subalternisation of Dharma is a postcolonial project and no amount of Chanakyaneetification can convince me that it is good for Dharma. It is *not* a masterstroke. The postcolonial school of thought in Bharat has done nothing except harm Dharma in d most insidious ways possible.
So pls think originally instead of repackaging postcolonialism's toxic nonsense as the basis of this grand Hindu unity project. Learn to read the past for what it was, warts and all, and evolve a policy that respects indigeneity and meets contemporary needs and challenges.
Our history isn't something u delete with a "hit reset" button to conveniently suit ur normative BS. Read before u offer half-baked solutions about such important social structures with d enthusiasm of a school kid who wants to impress d audience & wants a star in d report card.
The first thing a decolonised society must do is to sanitise its history as much as possible to remove colonial biases.Until such exercise is undertaken,the justifiable presumption is that more often than not,we are consuming colonialised versions of our past,which is unhealthy.
So when we are tempted to offer half-baked normative solutions based on our history *as received from the colonizer*, it's best to resist that temptation, burn the midnight oil and read or learn from better informed ppl. That's Dharmic humility.
If you don't have d humility to at least learn from those who have spent years trying to make sense of whatever remains of indigenous epistemology,ur solutions *must* be approached with deep circumspection notwithstanding your best intentions. After all,the road to hell..U know.
Anyways, it's close to Brahma Muhurtam now and Varuthini Ekadasi begins in a short while. Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Since some have asked me to explain the rationale behind invocation of Article 356 in the context of #bengalviolence, pls watch this video where I explain d position. Obviously d Supreme Court cannot impose emergency under Article 356 since that is d prerogative of d President.
Which is why what has been sought is a declaration that the constitutional machinery has broken down in the State of West Bengal within the meaning of Article 356, so that the President can take cognizance of it. Just clarifying. Not getting into a debate here on the subject.
Sir, they have never and they will never. But can the party with a difference stop pandering to them and look after its own cadre first? From abandoning its core constituents now to its own cadre. Fantastic 🙏🏾
The cadre did not support the BJP in the hope that d Left (not "liberals!") wud protect them from d wrath of d imported goons of d TMC. They hoped,as they should have,that their own party would anticipate this carnage & be prepared to protect them. But they have been left to die.
Central forces shuda been sent not just to preserve the integrity of the electoral process but also to prevent political violence post the results. That's the sign of a party that cares for its cadre as opposed to treating them as fodder to be thrown into the meat grinder.
Says the guy who consumes colonialised versions of Indian history lock, stock and barrel. Lol. Stay in your shoes and continue living the life of an embarrassing troll. An original informed discussion is well above your pay grade.
Position 1- firecrackers have nothing to do with Deepawali. Deepawali is all about Diyas.
Response - Nope. It is a ritual not a mere festivity.
Position 2- Firecrackers cause pollution. They must be banned.
Response - OK. Ban everything that causes all forms of pollution.
Position 3- firecrackers cause most pollution.
Response - show me d proof. IIT Delhi's Report on d causes of pollution in NCR goes against you. Firecrackers aren't even in d top 5. Stubble burning and year round construction activity are among the top causes.
1. Absolutely scintillating judgement delivered by d Madurai Bench of the Madras HC on 22/9/2020 in a petition filed by Shri @trramesh, President of d @indiccollective, challenging a tender notification issued by d Executive Officer of d Palani Temple. Sharing a few screenshots.
2. Read
3. The Court has recognised that the EO overstayed his welcome without justification.
1. If Hindutva is Hinduism that resists, well, it includes resisting the caricaturing of our Deities by Abrahamics, atheists or otherwise, & non-Abrahamics, atheists or otherwise. Given d history of oppression of Dharmic faith systems by Abrahamics, there is no room for symmetry.
2. Celebrate free speech and expression, sure, but do realise that their application isn't uniform and cannot be uniform because they are bound to land differently for the oppressor and the oppressed. After all, that's the underlying premise behind the SC/ST atrocities Act.
3. Abrahamic Athiests see Hinduism in d same light as their faiths. That's where d fundamental problem is. As long as this false equivalence is accepted, Abrahamic Athiests pose more of a threat to Hindus than their own faith systems for multiple reasons, which I will set out.
Here is the link to the Writ Petition filed in November 2019 by the guardians of the Tiruchendur Sri Subrahmanya Swamy Temple along with the @indiccollective challenging over 45 provisions of the TNHRCE Act 1959 and the rules framed thereunder- indiccollective.org/portfolio-item…
On December 18, 2019, the said Petition, W. P. (C) No. 1432/2019, was tagged with the Writ Petition filed by the late Swami Dayananda Saraswathi ji, W. P. (C) No. 476/2012 and the Writ Petition filed by the Podu Dikshitars of the Chidambaram Temple W. P. (C) No. 544/2009.
I will be shortly writing a series of pieces to factually take down brick by brick the motivated, manufactured & baseless myths pushed by those who stand in the way of Temple Freedom. None of the bogeys cited to defend State Control of Temples holds water on the ground.