In Nov we learned that the 1st mRNA vaccine was 95% effective for COVID. Since then the # of people who’ve died has more than doubled. Yesterday's #TRIPS news is a start. Here are next steps @joebiden must take to end the pandemic: 🧵
We have developed a comprehensive plan on how we could rapidly scale mRNA vaccine production and have shared it with the administration since Feb. More than a 100 days into his admin, this president still has not developed a plan for global vaccination. prep4all.org/news/hit-hard-…
And while committing to negotiate a TRIPS waiver is something, @joebiden needs to take more immediate action *today*. There are three actions Biden, with just his phone and pen, could do today to put the world on the path to global vaccination. 3/n
NO 1. Commit now to strengthening the raw material supply chain. One of the myths we see being perpetuated by the pharmaceutical industry is that a TRIPS waiver would weaken the raw materials supply chain. The exact opposite is true. 4/n
Take the custom cationic (positively charged) lipids used in mRNA vaccines. These fat like molecules are attracted to the negatively charged mRNA molecules, allowing a lipid nanoparticle to form around the RNA core during the nanoprecipitation process. 5/n
The problem is that, right now, very few companies are making these custom molecules & there are shortages. And a big problem there is intellectual property. Let’s look at SM-102, the cationic lipid used in Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. 6/n
SM-102 is a small molecule (molecular weight: ~700 daltons). Right now, only a single company (@CordenPharma) is making SM-102 for @moderna_tx. And there have been severe shortages of this molecule as a result. 7/n
Surely companies in the global south can make this molecule since they produce most of the global supply of API and excipients already. But any company who started manufacturing such a molecule would be infringing on a patent that protects it. 8/n
As our analysis indicates (pg. 34 of the report), even assuming 100% encapsulation efficiency, the world will need *alot* of SM-102. We estimate a *minimum* of 18 metric tons will be needed. 9/n
But we have seen when other companies are allowed to make cationic lipids, they can rapidly scale. @Evonik, a German specialty company, was able to scale lipid production in just 8 weeks. 10/n biopharminternational.com/view/evonik-de…
Biden can issue, today, an open tender for the US government to purchaseSM-102 and utilize a law, 28 U.S.C. §1498, that allows any company to use patents without worrying about infringement liability. This is known as government patent use. 11/n
(If you want to learn more about 28 U.S.C. §1498 and government patent use--sometimes known as “compulsory licensing”--read our user manual on the law, edited by the great @cmorten2 at @nyulaw) 12/n prep4all.org/news/1498guide
This would stimulate manufacturing capacity for SM-102 and signal to other countries that the US approves of government patent use during this emergency. So if govts can help companies get around patents, why do we need a TRIPS waiver? 13/n
While the TRIPS agreement explicitly allows government patent use, it explicitly *prohibits* the export of goods made using government patent use to other countries (see article 31(f) of the agreement). 14/n
So even without a TRIPS waiver, the US government can use §1498 to allow any company in the US capable of making SM-102 (or any other patented product) to make, but it couldn’t *export it* to e.g. India. That’s what a TRIPS waiver unlocks. 14/n
NO 2: @joebiden must help scale public production of mRNA vaccines. A big issue in increasing vaccine access is the myth that rapid production scale up is impossible, and that we can’t make/distribute those vaccines in LMICs. 15/n
Before we go into the weeds, let's address the most common question we get: if we could rapidly and dramatically increase mRNA vaccine production, why isn’t pharma scaling up production? 16/n
The answer: they are not incentivized to. This is a classic example of “market failure”. One thing that everyone agrees on is that ramping up vaccine production to the scale we need would cost billions of dollars. 17/n
And almost all of that additional capacity would serve LMICs, who would reasonably expect that the vaccine would be sold to them at cost (about $2 a dose) — rather than the ~10x markup that Moderna and Pfizer charge. 18/n
Once the pandemic is under control, the need for such massive vaccine capacity likely will drop. Remember, in non-pandemic times, total global demand for ALL vaccines combined is btw 3.5 - 5 billion doses py, according to @WHO. 19/n
The companies have already built enough capacity to vaccinate rich countries. They aren’t going to invest billions to serve demand that is not going to be very profitable and will disappear once the pandemic is brought under control. 20/n
And @JoeBiden could do this *today*. In the rescue package passed in March, Congress allocated US$16 billion for vaccine manufacturing scale up to the Biden admin. Almost *none* of that has been spent. 21/n
The core of our plan relies on creating mRNA vaccine production plants that are owned by local governments (both in the US & around the world) but operated by experienced entities that know how to make vaccines. 22/n
How much would this cost? Estimates put the cost for mRNA vaccine plants that could produce 16 billion doses per year — enough to vaccinate the entire global population in a single year — at less than US$4 billion. mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/…
Even using the costs that @LonzaGroup used to build the first of a kind initial plants for the @moderna_tx, and assume zero economics of scale, we are still at less than US$13 billion for plants that produce 16 billion doses per year. 24/n
This is less than Congress already gave @joebiden in the rescue package. @joebiden could build plants around the world *with the money already appropriated by Congress* to vaccinate the entire world in a year. 25/n
And this could be done fast. At the start of the pandemic, there was ZERO industrial scale capacity for mRNA vaccines. Within 10 months, we had a multi-billion dose per year capacity built from scratch. 26/n
Companies retooled old factories into mRNA vaccine factories in under 6 months, e.g. BioNTech group’s conversion of Novartis’s old Marburg plant in Germany: Within six months, BioNTech was producing mRNa vaccines for Germany & Turkey. 27/n
That brings us to NO 3: by creating publicly owned manufacturing facilities here and around the world, we create a workforce that could assist in teaching others how to make the vaccine. 28/n
Since @joebiden has taken office, more than 1 million people around the world have died from COVID-19. This is no time to dither — every day we wait to act is another 10,000 lives lost. 30/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Totally disingenuous argument from the CEO of @moderna_tx. Tech transfer for mRNA vaccines works to rapidly scale up production, even when there is no available manufacturing capacity. How do we know? This is the exact approach Moderna *itself* used to scale their production🧵
Let's start from the beginning. On January 23, 2020, Moderna got $65 million from the non-profit @CEPIvaccines to produce a small amount of doses to test the COVID vaccine they developed with @NIH in phase 1 trials. investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/…
Moderna, at this point is a small biotech. It has no commercial scale mRNA vaccine manufacturing capacity, there actually is none in the world at this pt. Its Norwood, MA facility can only basically make doses at the clinical trial scale. From 2 Mar 2020.: modernatx.com/moderna-blog/m…
Since December, we have been warning everyone that would listen that the world's overreliance on adenoviral vectored vaccines for COVID-19 was dangerous. This news from 🇿🇦 shows why. Mini- 🧵: dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-0…
As the virus mutates, we will need to change the design of the vaccine to combat new variants. But adenovirus vaccines are particularly challenging to develop these new variant busting boosters for two reasons.
First, the production of a given adenovirus vectored vaccine requires the generation of a "master cell line", engineered HEK293 or PER.C6 cells that can stably and productively express the vector to make the vaccine drug substance. Much effort is spent on this.
We w/@ICAP_ColumbiaU, published about our plan to for global vaccination for COVID by end of 2021. The plan relies on producing 16 billion doses of a highly effective mRNA vaccine at <$3 a jab, coupled w/ resources to ensure global distribution. 🧵1/24 nytimes.com/2021/01/12/opi…
Right now, even if everything w/ production goes perfectly, and EVERY leading vaccine candidate proves to be equally effective, current vaccine production will be insufficient to ensure universal global vaccination for COVID-19. 2/24
The real situation is far more dire than that. The Chinese inactivated vaccines & the AstraZeneca\Oxford vaccines – the majority of planned global production -- are likely much less effective than the mRNA vaccines, and we don’t have data yet on the others. 3/24
The reason we need to talk about a #PeoplesVaccine has everything to do with access. If the #HIV epidemic has taught us anything, it’s that new medical tools are useless unless people can get them (1/?)
We’ve had #PrEP and have known about #TasP since 2012, and yet 1.7 million people globally are newly infected with HIV every year because they cannot access the care they need (2/?)
Even if we identify a safe and effective #COVID19 vaccine, which is a big if, it will not do anything unless it is accessible to EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE (3/?)
(1/10) THREAD: After months of pressure, the federal government just sued @GileadSciences over their infringement of patents for two medications used to prevent HIV (PrEP). Have questions on how this happened and what it means? Follow along: #BreakThePatent
@GileadSciences (2/10) PrEP is an extraordinarily effective treatment. Taking a pill once a day can reduce the risk of HIV transmission by more than 99%: a more effective treatment than many vaccines.
@GileadSciences (3/10) In many countries, a generic version of the pill is available for ~$60 a year. In the US however, the pharma company @GileadSciences has the monopoly on PrEP, charging more than $20,000 a year for the SAME life-saving medication.