Reading Scruton on environmental philosophy. It's a clearly, lucidly written book, a lot of Heidegger though and I just don't think nationalism and environmental conservation are going to work, ultimately.
OMG this book is so anti-EU. (!!) I still find it super-useful to see this articulated though, so I appreciate the book. I would answer to Scruton that well nation states got a big push (funds, people giving their lives), of course they're doing well.
Also, not all is well. We are confronted with global stuff (pandemic, and climate change, hello) and nation states are simply not up to the job. And the failings of nation states are weirdly incapsulated in the resurgent nationalism cf this excellent piece theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/…
If the choice is between conservatism (of the intelligent kind cf Scruton, CS Lewis, Tolkien) and modernity of the internationalist kind, I still feel pulled toward modernity (thinking of @lastpositivist and @Kinder_Cons as 2 interesting voices on these contrasting positions!)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I suppose the audience for this is quite niche, but I'm going to go ahead and summarize a very early hard SF story namely Kepler's Somnium (Dream).
Background Johannes Kepler (1571 – 1630) was a German Renaissance astronomer, astrologer, and mathematician. 1/
He is wrote the Epitome astronomiae Copernicanae in which he formulated heliocentrism (based on Copernicus, but with elliptic trajectories). Now, heliocentrism was a total game changer because it opened the possbility to a plurality of worlds 2/
To get a sense of how radical and shocking, one reason heliocentrism faced such difficulty is that we would expect a parallax among the fixed stars. Since we don't that must mean the cosmos is truly enormous, and the stars very far away. Copernicus' reply: it is simply so. 3/
Watching the Penn&Teller masterclass on magic, here are their philosophical views on the practice.
Though the word has supernatural P&T overtones, they are thorough naturalists. "No-one leaves the theater believing something that we ourselves do not think is true on purpose." 1/
Penn: "illusion" = visual effect to accomplish a trick, e.g., mirror to make something appear different. Smart thing = the tricks.--tricks "involve intellectual engagements on the part of the audience" and involves "exploring epistemology" (how do we know what is true?" 2/
"[magic] is the heaviest philosophical ideas you can possibly have, dealt with in the silliest way"--it is playground for serious epistemological topics such as what to believe and what not (so Teller), you can play because there are no (dire) consequences. 3/
Some recent Uber drives and conversations (so long ago I was in an Uber!) about the vaccines make me think about misinformation and how important epistemic rights are. Many of these drivers had deeply mistaken, distorted beliefs about the vaccines and were hesitant to get them 1/
In this paper Lani Watson characterizes epistemic rights as a subset of human rights, more specifically "right to information, the right to know, the right to true and justified beliefs, the right to understand, and the right to truth" 2/
The Uber drivers I spoke to had distorted, mistaken beliefs about vaccines namely: that they would not be efficacious, that they weren't tested rigorously, that it was some scheme by Bill Gates, that they were unnecessary for them etc. All these beliefs are circulating 3/
@CT_Bergstrom Pfff the philosophical community has discussed this amply. If only he read some philosophy then at least he would be read up on it. This is an excellent paper on the topic bostonreview.net/race-philosoph…
@CT_Bergstrom Since I think few people will click through, let me just highlight a few important passages of this piece. The authors, @RDembroff
and Dee Payton, argue that there is an asymmetry between being transgender and being transracial 1/
@CT_Bergstrom@RDembroff They write "... it is a mistake to base this asymmetry on notions about who “really is” a woman or who “really is” Black. The social world is a dynamic and ever-changing place...."2/
Reading Heidi (Spyri) to my son. I loved the book as a kid and the descriptions of the mountains are still magical. But now... I'm just not sure if I love the book quite so much. There are two problems. First, there is Alm-uncle (grandfather). Basically a bunch of bigots 1/
Who rejected him and cast him out because he came as a single father with a small child back from Naples to the small village in Switzerland. Oooh he's a single dad. He must've done something wrong. And he was shunned. And now he's supposed to make amends with the community 2/
Second major problem: there are strong disabled characters (the grandma of Peter and the girl Clara) - this is good. But their disability is portrayed as something that voids their life almost from all meaning, super-negative. We see this through Heidi's eyes in parts, still 3/
OMG I am having an absolute blast listening to Chris Voss, former hostage negotiator, talk about how to negotiate. I have no idea if these techniques work but my God it is so entertaining. My next negotiation (and we negotiate so frequently), I am going all in!
For posterity, I'm going to put some tips by this hostage negotiator in a thread.
Tip #1: Negotiation is about building trust and establishing a relationship. It is counterproductive to go in with a bottom line. Much better to establish relationship & see what can be achieved 2/
(side note: I find it so interesting to have a hostage negotiator of all people advocate for non-zero sum negotiation tactics. This makes me think that zero-sum or not really is an attitude, not so much driven by circumstance as we think) 3/