Since today's emergency press conference on #COVID19 data in B.C. is telephone only, I'm going to use this thread to livetweet the questions and answers in a straightforward fashion, instead of the usual charts/context/jokes approach
Dr. Réka Gustafson begins the press conference, says she's going to "raise some awareness" on the public health surveillance done by B.C.

Explains how data is used for making decisions.

"It's an established process, and with every week and day we try to improve it."
Gustafson says the province "makes as much of the data as possible … available publicly."

Says "there has been a particular interest in the data".

Dr. Henry says the data "is for decision making" and there is weekly technical meetings.
Dr. Henry explains/defends the current approach, says they've provided more data as things have gone on, says data eventually "goes public, in a way that can help inform people."

Questions now beginning.
The first question is asking what the actual positivity rate is in some Surrey neighbourhoods, since the data only showed that it was above 20%.

Dr. Gustafson can't say, also says it's not necessarily helpful because of a small sample size.
Dr. Henry also saying that the weekly positivity rate less important than the positivity rate over time.

The province has not provided the positivity rate at a local health area at any point during the course of the pandemic.
A followup question on high transmission rates in Surrey, whether it would delay removing restrictions.

Dr. Henry says "we’ve been reporting on local health rates of disease for over a year now."

This is not true. A year ago they were not.

cbc.ca/news/canada/br…
Dr. Henry says “COVID zero is not a viable option once you have a lot of transmission in your community, and we’ve been in that place for a long time.”
Gustafson says about restrictions, “as we move along the vaccination campaign, as we continue to protect immunizations, the daily rates or control measures will shift away from restrictions.”
A question is asked about releasing the internal BCCDC reports.

Dr. Henry says "we do release almost all of that information that were in some the reports that were posted."

The information on Community Health Service Areas has never been released.
Dr. Gustafson says it was helpful to see that people enjoyed that data, say it may inform future decisions.

Says that putting out the data publicly is a lot of work.

Also says that "none of that information is ... concerning for us when it's in the public domain."
Dr. Henry says on releasing the data "there’s a process that it goes through before it's meaningful."

"There's a context that it's put in before it's released publicly."

personally i think the leaked data is pretty meaningful and has lots of context
Another question points out that other provinces release community information proactively every single day.

Wonders why B.C. can't do the same.

Dr. Henry says they are releasing more information that some provinces.

I will follow up to ask for examples.
Dr. Gustafson said that on the BCCDC website "there’s a great deal of information, including positivity rates per neighbourhood, or local health area."

I have never seen positivity rates per neighbourhood or local health area.

Ever.

If I am wrong, I would love to shown so.
Followup question is "what specifically is going to change?"

Gustafson says they are working on providing neighbourhood level rates and immunization rates.

"That's our goal in the coming weeks."
Dr. Henry admits a little more explicitly the province's IT issues, says “we don’t actually have systems to support the same consistent collection of the same data over time.”
A new question points out again that other provinces provided more detailed data, asks "14 months into this pandemic, why have you decided we’re weeks away from getting this information?"

The question is not particularly answered.

Dr. Gustafson says the leak was not a leak.
Dr. Gustafson again repeats that all the information in the internal BCCDC reports are things they are comfortable sharing with the public.

They have never shared case counts or positivity rates at the community health service area level, and didn't respond to my question.
A followup question says "I can hear that you think you are being transparent", but points out other people don't think so.

Asks if they will commit to sharing more information.

Gustafson says yes.

Says again that the "vast majority" of the leaked data is regularly released.
New question asks if the government can point to any actual group that supports the province's approach on data re: privacy/stigmatization.

Dr. Henry cites anti-Asian racism, does not cite any particular groups that support the government's approach.
CBC asks a followup question about the government not responding to questions by me about community health service areas data for 15 days.

Dr. Henry says that they actually don't gather that data every week, but it's a goal to do so going forward.
Dr. Gustafson is explaining the early days of the pandemic when cases were low enough that individual cases in communities could have raised privacy concerns.

But says "we are not in that stage of the pandemic now."

Which, yes. That's why we're having this press conference.
A question is about people feeling condescended to.

Dr. Henry says "it is finding that balance. We have been very open from the very beginning where we’ve presented as much as we could. People always want more, unless you’re the one potentially at risk."
Dr. Gustafson says the debate about data is good and we're all learning things.

Says "I completely hear you and acknowledge that there are people who want more granular and more timely data, there are others who want it less granular and less timely."

who are these "others"
There's a long answer by Dr. Henry talking about systemic inequities and how a lot of communication is done on a 1-on-1 or family basis.

Dr. Gustafson says "public health is managed very, very closely at the local level" and that "they're working incredibly hard."
Another question on why community-level data isn't shown.

Dr. Henry says of the leaked data "this information is information we’ve pulled from multiple databases in the last few weeks."

"We are working hard to make them publicly, and it takes time."

They say maybe next week.
Dr. Gustafson repeats that they have all this information, and "it exists in the hands of people who are serving the community day to day. That’s where the data is gathered."

Acknowledges that providing that publicly "does take some resources, and does take some time."
There's a question about whether a regional approach may happen for B.C. re: restrictions in the coming months.

Dr. Henry says no, believes that approach wouldn't work.
The final question is about vaccinating priority workers on Vancouver Island.

Not gonna summarize it.

The press conference is over.

I hope that was helpful, in its own way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin McElroy

Justin McElroy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @j_mcelroy

8 May
I think the thing about reporters increasingly showing their frustration with B.C.'s transparency is that pretty much everybody has changed their lives in huge ways to deal with a deadly pandemic, and the province's communications strategy seems to have stayed the same.
Taking hours to provide information to some requests and weeks for others, providing data only when it can have a shiny bow on it, hearing requests for transparency changes and sticking with the status quo...that's politics.

Most reporters, at a certain level, accept that.
So you'll make a note in your story that the government didn't respond, or that B.C. lags behind province X in metric Y, or that you haven't gotten your FOI back, and move on. There's another story to cover. The daily battle for information continues.
Read 8 tweets
7 May
722 cases of #COVID19 announced in B.C. today — the 19th straight day the province's rolling average has gone down, though this time only by a tiny bit.

Hospitalizations down to 445, and seven new deaths, highest since April 21.

Today's chart.
46,946 people received vaccine shots in B.C. yesterday (2nd highest in the campaign), including 3,605 second doses, the highest mark since February.

We're on pace for every adult getting their first dose in the next five weeks.
We've gone from 60-70 hospitalizations a day in B.C. to 30-50, which is why we're now seeing this decrease.

At the same time, it means we're still going to be over 300 hospitalizations, concentrated heavily in Fraser Health, for a while yet.
Read 4 tweets
7 May
again, it's frankly embarrassing

Just say you don't want to share the information with the public instead of insultingly stringing along journalists for months.
What's probably going to happen is the government will provide information on neighbourhood case counts at some point in the near future.

They will applaud themselves for being transparent.
on a related note, the bccdc dashboard (which the government often trumpets as the way they are transparent) is having a "systems" issue for the third time in four days

it's fun, it's fun, i love it here
Read 6 tweets
6 May
684 new cases of #COVID19 announced in B.C. today, as the province's rolling average and active case count continues decline at a steady pace.

Hospitalizations now down to 457, the lowest since April 20.

One new death.

Today's chart.
A RECORD HIGH 52,266 people in B.C. were given a vaccine shot yesterday, as the doubling of Pfizer vaccine is starting to show dividends.

2,200 of those were second shots, and we'll start to see that number increase in the coming weeks.
Dr. Henry tried to centre today's announcement on B.C. getting to two million doses administered at some point today.

Celebrating big round numbers is fun, but providing regular data on vaccinations by age and city is even funner.
Read 4 tweets
6 May
News out of Prince Rupert continues to be good.

Two months ago, it was the hotspot for transmission in British Columbia.

85% of adults were given a vaccine shot.

Weekly #COVID19 cases fell from more than 100 to 3.

Then they went to 2.

Last week, there was ONE CASE.
everyone says bring back the boring chart but really let's have the prince rupert chart for the entire province
More good news!

One month ago, the B.C.'s transmission hotspot was Whistler.

Everyone there was given a chance to get a shot.

There were 410 cases in their local health area at the peak.

Last week, there were 39.

A 95% reduction, three weeks after mass vaccination.
Read 4 tweets
5 May
572 cases of #COVID19 in B.C. today, the lowest number since March 20, as B.C.'s curve continues to bend down at a VERY encouraging pace.

Hospitalizations down to 481, and zero new deaths.

Today's chart.
33,068 people given a vaccine shot in B.C. yesterday, 1,412 of which were a second dose — highest number since early March.

Stilllllll waiting for that ramp up in daily numbers which *should* happen very soon now.
Because of a data correction, the charts record negative three #COVID19 deaths in B.C. today.

(the province says there were zero)

As you can see, it doesn't change the rolling average all that substantially for the moment.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(