I think the thing about reporters increasingly showing their frustration with B.C.'s transparency is that pretty much everybody has changed their lives in huge ways to deal with a deadly pandemic, and the province's communications strategy seems to have stayed the same.
Taking hours to provide information to some requests and weeks for others, providing data only when it can have a shiny bow on it, hearing requests for transparency changes and sticking with the status quo...that's politics.
Most reporters, at a certain level, accept that.
So you'll make a note in your story that the government didn't respond, or that B.C. lags behind province X in metric Y, or that you haven't gotten your FOI back, and move on. There's another story to cover. The daily battle for information continues.
But this isn't "government hasn't completed its promise" or "opposition accuses cabinet minister of corruption".
It's a virus that has killed millions of people.
It would seem to require a different, more apolitical sort of response.
Instead, reporters deal with the same issues of waiting weeks for basic responses.
Doctors are told not to speak to reporters.
Even getting images of the first people vaccinated in B.C., a happy news story if there was one, turned into a giant tug of war over access.
I honestly don't think a lot of this is malice.
I think it's a culture among B.C. political communication leaders and advisors, in all parties, that data and information needs to be controlled, and the media is inherently not to be trusted sharing it.
And to be fair, in the first half of the pandemic, the government quickly and proactively responded to many requests, even if the answer was "no, we're not sharing that."
But as it has gone on, people are more tired, criticisms more targeted, the core culture has reverted.
Anyhow, it's a nice day and I should spend it not on the hate machine.
But hopefully this got at some of the clear rise in frustration you've seen from a number of reporters that have covered this pandemic for a while.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
722 cases of #COVID19 announced in B.C. today — the 19th straight day the province's rolling average has gone down, though this time only by a tiny bit.
Hospitalizations down to 445, and seven new deaths, highest since April 21.
Today's chart.
46,946 people received vaccine shots in B.C. yesterday (2nd highest in the campaign), including 3,605 second doses, the highest mark since February.
We're on pace for every adult getting their first dose in the next five weeks.
We've gone from 60-70 hospitalizations a day in B.C. to 30-50, which is why we're now seeing this decrease.
At the same time, it means we're still going to be over 300 hospitalizations, concentrated heavily in Fraser Health, for a while yet.
Since today's emergency press conference on #COVID19 data in B.C. is telephone only, I'm going to use this thread to livetweet the questions and answers in a straightforward fashion, instead of the usual charts/context/jokes approach
Dr. Réka Gustafson begins the press conference, says she's going to "raise some awareness" on the public health surveillance done by B.C.
Explains how data is used for making decisions.
"It's an established process, and with every week and day we try to improve it."
Gustafson says the province "makes as much of the data as possible … available publicly."
Says "there has been a particular interest in the data".
Dr. Henry says the data "is for decision making" and there is weekly technical meetings.
What's probably going to happen is the government will provide information on neighbourhood case counts at some point in the near future.
They will applaud themselves for being transparent.
on a related note, the bccdc dashboard (which the government often trumpets as the way they are transparent) is having a "systems" issue for the third time in four days