Before the final results in Scotland, a reminder:

▪️These are national parliamentary elections. Not local.

▪️The most prominent issue in them has been whether one nation (Scotland) should hold a referendum on leaving union of nations (UK). /1.
▪️A parliamentary majority for an independence referendum will be just that. Given Scotland’s proportional voting system, that’s as good & constitutionally sound an expression of democratic will as you’ll find. (Note: in a Westminster system, the SNP would have 80%+ of MSPs). /2.
▪️Such a majority looks likely: SNP + Greens. We’ll find out later.

▪️It’s possible, but less likely, that the SNP will achieve a governing majority on its own: 65 or more MSPs out of 129. More likely: SNP just below that, & a governing majority in coalition with the Greens. /3.
▪️Either way, a Scottish parliamentary majority for an independence referendum, & a governing majority for independence, would firmly place the onus on those who disagree to demonstrate that they have a better alternative. /4.
▪️And: both at the UK level & within Scotland, to explain the democratic & constitutional basis for it.

▪️And: in Scotland, to win a majority in the new Parliament for their position. /5.
▪️Opinion polls &, very likely, the results of this election, show Scotland to be roughly evenly split on independence. That offers plenty of space for each side to make their arguments. /6.
▪️But no one, like the SNP or loathe it, can reasonably deny the extraordinary feat, & relevance, of them winning (as looks certain) a fourth consecutive national election victory. And (as looks very likely) another pro-independence governing majority. /7.
▪️Unless there’s a dramatic shift in governance of the UK & its relationship to the European continent - reversing the 127 days of destructive chaos so far - the Union will continue to tear itself apart. /8. End
Correction: slight typo in tweet 1. Should be “a union”.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Levi

Andrew Levi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewPRLevi

9 May
Most of England - politicians, media, public - has little idea of the extraordinary political event which has taken place in Scotland.

The same’s true of many Scottish unionists.

The Union’s closer to break up than any time in 314 years.

Ostriches won’t save it. What might?/1.
Because opinion on independence is approx. evenly split (itself a huge deal: around half of people in Scotland want to leave the UK!) relatively small shifts can tip the balance.

And, no doubt, everything will be tried to achieve that. /2.
But, what’s really made a difference to support for independence is England’s & Westminster’s descent into what’s perceived as chaotically unreliable, untrustworthy, incompetent & cruel governance. /3.
Read 8 tweets
8 May
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Election: update & implications 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

The maximum constituency wins @theSNP can now achieve is 62.

So they’ll need 3 regional list seats for an overall majority (65).

BBC says that isn’t on. I’m less sure. (@WhatScotsThink is the BBC analyst, so I say it with trepidation). /1.
Either way, to be certain we’re going to have to wait for the regional list results.

If the @theSNP doesn’t get an overall majority there’ll almost certainly be a parliamentary majority for independence, as @scottishgreens will win a number of seats. /2.
The territorial integrity of the United Kingdom has never been less likely to survive. Since a century ago, when the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Ireland ended.

Northern Ireland’s been part defenestrated, by the UK’s choice to leave the EU customs union & single market. /3.
Read 5 tweets
2 May
The sister of a colleague is having trouble with the truth, liars, lies, lying & falsehoods. She doesn’t know what they are. She has over a million Twitter followers & a huge media profile.

I worry for my colleague. Her sister. And the UK. I thought I might try to help.

A🧵/1.
The @OED will, I hope, forgive me for the inevitable process of simplification I’m about to apply to their learned entries. But I’ll try to avoid recreating the farrago of nonsense we’ve been seeing on the subject of truth & lying.

Let’s start with the meaning of “true”. /2.
This is quite easy really. For those not easily distracted by inverted pyramids of piffle.

To be true is to conform with reality & fact.

Which brings us to “truth”.

Truth is that which is true. Real. Factual.

Phew. We’re getting somewhere.

Bear with me. /3.
Read 11 tweets
1 May
Many thanks for comments received on Amb E-J von Studnitz’s recent article (see attached🧵👇) about Russia & Germany.

These are important reflections on an existentially significant matter for the Euro-Atlantic alliance & the world.

My initial thoughts in response. A short🧵/1.
The biggest challenge raised by the analysis in the article is the apparent complete lack of willingness of the Putin-Russian power elite to engage in hoped for manner. It would surely be to the benefit of Russia if it did. /2.
And, as the article convincingly sets out, there’s no (good) alternative for Russia. But it would be disastrous to Putin & his power grouping. Or, at least, they couldn’t have any confidence that it wouldn’t be. /3.
Read 11 tweets
30 Apr
Russia & Germany - what next?

It’s a perilous moment in the internal & external development of Russia.

Few understand Russia & Germany better than Ernst-Jörg von Studnitz (below with Mikhail Gorbachev).

In a recent article he says Nordstream 2 & old thinking must go. A 🧵/1.
Published originally in German (below) in the Redoute Papers series, Ambassador von Studnitz’s article is presented in English, in this short🧵. Each page accompanied by a one-tweet summary/ commentary by me. It carries sharp messages for German & other western policy-makers. /2.
Drawing on deep historical understanding & over half a century’s experience dealing with Russia, including as German ambassador in Moscow 1995 - 2002, Dr von Studnitz examines the Germany-Russia context facing a new Chancellor in Berlin this September. Old approaches are out. /3.
Read 11 tweets
29 Apr
Margaret Thatcher gave the impartial, professional Civil Service a big shove down the slippery slope of politicisation & cronyism, decades ago. Previously, Harold Wilson had given it a modest kick. But it was her 1985 assault which set the stage for the current crisis.

A 🧵/1.
Via Robert Armstrong, the then head of the Civil Service, she insisted the Crown was indistinguishable from the government of the day. So, service to the former was to be understood as service to the latter & vice versa. /2.
The actual “Armstrong Memorandum” (subsequently updated) was & is a deal more sophisticated than that. And, at one level, it’s a non-point. Ministers are set above civil servants. No one denies it. But, of course, it wasn’t meaningless. Far from it. The intent was clear. /3.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(