In the final days of Ramadan Muslims are focused on Laylat al-Qadr (LQ), the night of destiny, which Islamic history identifies as the historical moment of the revelation of the Qurʾān (and all previous revelations).

A thread 🧵 on my research:

brill.com/view/book/edco…

1/
Ramadan and other months existed as sacred time in pre-Islamic times, and were integrated and re-assigned in Islam. But LQ is uniquely designated as sacred time by the Quran, *created* by the religion when itself formed. There is no LQ without Islam, and no Islam without LQ.

2/
A great misunderstanding is how the Quran was revealed from a theological perspective. Many people have this idea that the Angel Gabriel went up to God and down to Muhammed ﷺ as if sacred cosmology is like a skyscraper with God as a CEO *in the world* and *in time*.
3/
This is of course a form of anthropomorphism rejected by mainstream Islamic theologies. God created the world with all its dimensions, the seen (ʿālam al-shahāda) and unseen (ʿālam al-ghayb) worlds, in which (meta)physical beings and existences inhere. A multiplex cosmology.
4/
When God created the totality of existence (“the world”) with time and space, sacred (“metaphysical”) time and space were created as well. In Islamic cosmology these metaphysical sacred spaces are inhabited by sacred existences like the Preserved Tablet (al-Lawḥ al-Maḥfūẓ). 5/
The Tablet is a metaphysical record of all thing’s events & states that will and could occur (umm al-kitāb, Q 3:7/13:39/43:4. kitāb maknūn, Q 56:79). A spectrum describing (bi-l-waṣf) but not necessarily ordering (wa lā bi-l-ḥukm) destiny, expressing God’s eternal knowledge.
6/
On this Tablet are also all revelations recorded, the Ur-revelation (al-Dhikr, Q.16:43/21:48), in a heavenly non-earth language form (ashkāl). When revelation descends from the Tablet (tanzīl) to a specific prophet it will take on their human language structure (manẓūm).
7/
Tablet is in the highest *metaphysical* heaven from which angels descend to physical earth (descend=crossing the (meta)physical worlds).
The Quran was sent down *completely* (jumla) from the Tablet to the lowest metaphysical heaven, and from there revealed piecemeal to earth. 8/
Islamic revelatory cosmology therefore overlaps with the Islamic created cosmology. God’s creative act and revelatory act manifest themselves in creation as a singular event, but God does not inhere in creation. Revelation is in an event *in* creation, *in* space and time.

9/
This is why the Quran (and other revelations) *are* directed and divinely controlled manifestations of divine speech within creation, but with letters and sounds, while divine speech itself doesn’t exist through letters or sounds (laysa min jins al-ḥurūf wa al-aṣwāt).

10/
The complex discussion on the Quran being created or not (makhlūq aw ghayri makhlūq) is first of all part of a larger *cosmological* discussion, and not only one focused on divine attributes.

Back to our discussion on LQ!

11/
The Quran descends via the Angel Gabriel from the highest (Tablet) to the lowest metaphysical heaven, dimensions of the ʿālam al-ghayb (=*within* creation!), this first descend/sent down (1st tanzīl) is in *one piece* (jumla). Then it descends over 23 years to physical earth. 12/
The Quran is in this second descend (2nd tanzīl) revealed, via Gabriel, piecemeal from the lowest metaphysical heaven to physical earth over a period of 23 years to the Prophet Muḥammad ﷺ. According to his and his context’s needs for guidance.

13/
LQ is therefore understood in two ways:
1. LQ is when the Quran descends from the highest to the lowest metaphysical heavens (1st tanzīl).
2. And/Or, LQ is when the Quran descends from the lowest metaphysical heaven to physical earth to Muḥammad ﷺ (2nd tanzīl).

14/
This is why the Islamic tradition talks about *multiple* LQ’s in human sacred history (LQ’s that occur within metaphysical heavens, and LQ between metaphysical-physical worlds).

But LQ is not only about revelation, it is ALSO about destiny, qadr.

15/
Qadr in Islamic theology is the concrete realization within creation of the divine decree (qaḍā). Qadr incorporates both what occurs due to imperative necessity (iḍṭirāriyya) and/or due to free will (ikhtiyāriyya).

See my sheets I use in my ʿAqīda classes @IURotterdam:

16/
Everything occurs through divine decree (qaḍā), including the freely chosen acts by intelligent agents like humans (ikhtiyāriyya), these abstract forms will (irāda) expresses itself in creation (they become concrete/real) through divine Qadr.

17/
Nothing is outside divine knowledge or control. There is no surprising the Creator, as He is outside time and space (created structures and limitations). But as our free will is expressed through Qadr, it means our Qadr (“destiny”) has a contextual side to it.

18/
This is why it is stated that the Preserved Tablet describes our realities (ḥaqiqāt) *and* our possibilities (imkāniyya) for which we will be judged. We could have made better/worst free will choices which will testify against/for us on the Day of Judgement.

19/
This Qadr combination of imperative necessity (iḍṭirāriyya) and free will (ikhtiyāriyya), this personal destiny, is *sent down* to each human each year during LQ as well.

So LQ is about sacred history (revelation) AND personal reality (destiny).

20/
So we have dealt with the theological concepts surrounding LQ. Now we simply have a logistical issue left: When is it? There are many seemingly conflicting traditions on its timing: During all the year, or several months, or first/middle/last part or uneven days of Ramadan.

21/
So what is the solution in dealing with this multiplicity? The Islamic tradition emphasized 3 things:

1. Believers are judged by intention → You are responsible for searching LQ by spreading out repetitive worship and charity, you are *not* responsible for finding LQ.

22/
2. 27th of Ramadan is the most accepted opinion, but LQ can be any night during Ramadan, even the whole year, as there were multiple Laylat al-Qadr’s in revelatory history. Sacred time as a metaphysical concept is *not* the same as physical time. There is not a clock for it.

23/
As stated by al-Māturīdī in the above screenshot.

3. For the blessed seekers with the right conditions, according to a tradition from Ibn ʿAbbās, will know it is LQ because the night wasn’t hot or cold, and because at dawn the sun at sunrise has a weak red glow.

24/
The multiplicity of LQ as revelational history (metaphysical sacred time), LQ as personal destiny (metaphysical ontology), LQ as a possible moment in present time (physical time), are all discussed in Sunnī exegeses of Sūrat al-Qadr (Q.97):

End/25
For the full research, with translation of al-Māturīdī’s exegesis on Sūrat al-Qadr, see my chapter:

"Laylat al-Qadr as Sacred Time: Sacred Cosmology in Sunnī Kalām and Tafsīr", Islamic Studies Today: Essays in Honor of Andrew Rippin (Leiden: Brill, 2017)

academia.edu/29695377/_Layl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Arnold Yasin Mol

Arnold Yasin Mol Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ArnoldYasinMol

19 Sep 20
What is the wisdom of creating mankind?

The Ottoman Shaykh al-Islam Kemālpāshazāde (d.940/1534) in his treatise on creed provides a small summary:

-God was a hidden secret→He wants to be known→creates creation.
-Of God’s Names, Light is manifested→from which...
→from which He creates the Muḥammadan Reality→from which He creates all existence→Mankind is the best part of this creation→Mankind cannot escape that it needs to settle for rest as it has a body→a body needs a place→earth is created as its place on which Man is created→
→Man also needs food, but on dry earth nothing grows→so God creates the sky from which rain falls so plants can grow→of this all kinds of foods can be acquired→so this is also why God created mankind, to eat this food→some are grateful&obey&worship God→so God gives them...
Read 5 tweets
11 Jul 20
“Historically the expansion of colonialism had to do with the broader question, Who is it that the Earth belongs to? That was the key question underlying colonial conquest and imperial expansion since the 15th century…

newframe.com/thoughts-on-th…
…European powers had decided that the Earth in its entirety belonged to them. They were its true owners, and they could occupy lands that were populated by foreign people…To a large extent, colonial expansion was a planetary project…
…decolonisation is by definition a planetary enterprise, a radical openness of and to the world, a deep breathing for the world as opposed to insulation…Because racism is in the DNA of colonialism. There is no colonialism that doesn’t entail a huge dose of structural racism…
Read 18 tweets
22 Jun 20
A small thread on the Islamic theological theories of language:

Quran verse 2:31 “He taught Adam all the names” is central to the Islamic discussion on the nature of language. The majority of theologians among the Muʿtazila, early Ashʿarī, and Māturīdī schools understood... 1/
...ʿallama in its apparent meaning of ‘taught’, as in that language, both in form (lafẓa) and meaning (maʿanā), was in one way or another divinely imposed (bi-l-tawqīfi) on the first human(s). But a minority among the Muʿtazila proposed an alternative semantic meaning... 2/
...for ʿallama as ‘inspired with the impulse to do a thing’, whereby only the impulse is divinely imposed but the lingual form and meaning is naturally and rationally constructed by humans themselves. The later Ashʿarī and Māturīdī eventually held that both views were possible 3/
Read 5 tweets
15 Jun 20
Premodern Islam had a quality something modern Islam has lost: the quality to embrace multiplicity and ambiguity.

For centuries the Islamic intellectual tradition discussed in detail Qurʾānic multiplicity and ambiguity in meaning and recitation.
We had a *qualitive* approach to the Qurʾān and how we understood it to be true and historically authentic. With Enlightenment modernity we started to have a *quantative* approach to truth, this mathematical approach viewed ambiguity as equal to untruth.
I remember lecturing to a room full of imams on the premodern embrace of multiplicity and ambiguity in Qurʾānic studies and tafsīr. At one point I cited Suyūṭī on this, and before I could mention it being Suyūṭī an imam started shouting I was lying and mistaken.
Read 10 tweets
2 Jun 20
This development from pre-classical proto-Sunnism to demarcated classical Sunnism is also discernible within exegetical history whereby school-defining heuristics on key verses went from “it could be saying (yuqālu)” in the 9th century to “Ahl al-Sunna say” in the 11th century 1/
An important element in the development to this demarcated Sunnī identity is it self-othering from important ‘others’ such as the Muʿtazila. A common phrase in post-classical works is: “And this opinion is what is adhered to by the
ahl al-Sunna, while the Muʿtazila say...” 2/
I have mapped out this development from proto-Sunnī to Sunnī heuristics within exegetical history for Qurʾān verse 11:117 (and a little for 2:29 and 17:15 as well) in this article, and I hope to do this with more key verses in future writings:

academia.edu/36916673/_Divi…

/3
Read 4 tweets
18 Mar 20
All the disinformation going around among Muslims on so many issues, Islam, world politics, and now #Corona , whereby people forward anything blindly, shows that Muslims really must learn critical engagement to information.

A small thread on Asbāb al-ʿilm

1/
Classical epistemology is discussed in works on creed/philosophical theology (ʿaqīda/ʿilm al-kalām) and philosophy of law (uṣūl al-fiqh), as “causes of knowledge” (asbāb al-ʿilm). These were first discussed in early Kalām, and were connected to the discussion on prophethood.

2/
Epistemology was directly linked to prophethood, as why would we need “revelation” as a source of knowledge? Can humans attain full truth about the world on their own? So theologians started to divide up different forms and causes of knowledge.

3/
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(