Hugging was never *not* allowed, but the fact absolutely no one in the media checked or questioned this, & that the commentariat seems A-OK with Michael Gove instructing the public on when they can/cannot embrace other humans, is why we’re now living in twilight totalitarianism👎
Ordinary people are just using their common sense about all this. The elitist fantasy of population micro-controls via regulations, statutory instruments, Govnt webpages that change every day, or Michael Gove’s disturbed stream of consciousness, are just that. Fantasy...
Also, this is the sort of territory where you will more or less never see The Fact Checkers who seem to have become more comfortable punching down than actually holding power to account.
The point from which civilisation must, somehow, revive

bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-570…
The lifting of a hugging ban that literally does not exist is on every single *front page* today, and is also a topic of conversation on BBC #r4today...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Silkie Carlo

Silkie Carlo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @silkiecarlo

3 Apr
The government, which isn’t known for its anti-discrimination credentials, will argue that Covid passes are not discriminatory because you can get the green tick via tests rather than vaccine/immunity.. 🥴 Wrong. Point missed. Here’s why...
First, the Covid pass is a health ID card for segregation via civilian enforcement. It will be a tool of oppression for bouncers, bosses, anyone with authority to police others. Like all suspicionless checks (stop & search) it will be used as a stick to beat marginalised groups.
Second, healthy people without vaccines would have to be tested more than lab rats, likely incurring time off work (soon college/uni?), possibly costs, with an unacceptably high risk of false positives that lead to more missed work, isolation and socio-economic disadvantage.
Read 6 tweets
19 Dec 20
It’s crystal clear - as Britain falls into the grips of authoritarianism, the pillars of democracy we thought we had have already crumbled.

Because as this is happening, there is NO alarm ringing on the BBC, in parliament or even courts.

Barely. Even. Questions.
Amidst 24h rolling coverage of cases, there has been practically ZERO reflection in the media off the abuse of Ministerial diktat, urgent procedures, police abuses.

Now Christmas is banned just as parliament goes on recess & schools close.

Can anyone see the wood for the trees?
You don’t even need to encourage civil disobedience. Because people WILL see family members at Christmas if they’ve assessed it’s safe to do so.

If you call that a criminal offence, we are a nation of criminals.
Read 5 tweets
24 May 20
Cummings almost certainly broke lockdown regulations. He also demonstrated that the Coronavirus Act quarantine powers are unacceptably extremist, unnecessary & yet dangerously hovering at the fingertips of authorities to use against the public whilst protecting their own. The Act
...(Sch 21) allows police to forcibly detain, test & isolate people with suspected infections - even children.

The Act suspends elections, enlarges ministerial power, suspends the most fundamental freedoms - all purportedly for public health. I do not use the word lightly but
these are fascistic powers. They are not justified.

We’ve just been through a peak of the virus without Coronavirus Act Sch.21 (test/quarantine powers) being needed yet they’ve naturally, as with all extreme powers, been abused + wielded against the most vulnerable people.
Read 5 tweets
29 Jul 18
Suspended NUS Trans Officer Jess Bradley has instructed libel lawyers Carter Ruck who are using BBC/Cliff Richard’s privacy case (!) to try to silence media reporting on the suspension. Hilarious, were the whole thing not so deeply disturbing.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6…
I’ve seen the blog posts, alleged to be re/posted by Jess Bradley, on archive.is. Understandable why the Mail reported lightly, but the alleged posts are far worse than reported. Thread about that here: twitter.com/xnomoresilence
Clearly a matter of public interest..!
And Jess Bradley’s statement doesn’t even deny the allegations - it says “I am confident that none of my behaviour has been unlawful”.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(