1 "Stanton Friedman and Don Berliner finally were forced to disavow their star witness in a letter to the editor published in the Jan. 1993 issue of the MUFON UFO Journal. They publicly stated that they 'no longer have confidence in the testimony of Gerald Anderson, who claims to
2 "'have stumbled upon a crash site with members of his family. Anderson has admitted falsifying a document & so his testimony about finding wreckage of a crashed flying saucer near the Plains of San Augustin in western New Mexico, can no longer be seen as sufficiently reliable.'
3 "However, Friedman and Berliner went on 'This does not mean (we) feel there was no crash at the Plains of San Augustin; There is considerable impressive testimony to such an event. Nor does it mean that everything reported by Gerald Anderson is without value.'
4 "The editor of the Journal, Dennis Stacey, rightly commented: 'Although, it strongly suggests it!'"
1 LE explains there are laws preventing him from conducting disinfo ops vs. Americans. Then adds:
"There r plenty of people in the UFO community, right now, that r conducting disinfo operations against us, but they're not former, federal employees." ~@LueElizondo 2 @PodcastUFO
2 "We're dealing with something that may change the very paradigm in which the human species looks at itself and views itself in the Universe." ~Lue
3 "The moment the government, writ large, comes to me and says, 'Lue, stand down,' I'll probably stand down. But I haven't been told that, yet, by my gov't. I've been told that by certain people in the gov't but they don't represent the gov't." ~Lue
1 Decent article from 2003 on Vallee/Harris, 1945 alleged crash/retrieval case.
"The two men, now in their mid to late 60s, still have a piece of the craft & know where other parts were buried by the military.
"'The work detail wasn't too efficient,' said Reme, who noted from
2 "his experience in the Marines that military parts had numbers and were carefully catalogued. 'The soldiers threw some of the pieces down a crevice, so they wouldn't have to carry them,' he said. 'Then they would kick dirt and rocks and brush over them to cover them up.'
3 "'I don't know if they knew what they had,' Reme said. 'It was a fairly crude craft with no parts numbers on it, and the piece we have, we were told is not remarkably machined even for 1945. But there's nothing that says aliens have to travel in remarkable spaceships. Given
1 Will live tweet as much as I can w/tonight's C2C w/Knapp/Fugal/Corbell & Reuben Langdon (Citizens Hearing on UFO Disclosure). I'll only include new stuff. As I said yesterday, it's a great time to be alive, so if you're gonna complain about every little thing, go elsewhere.
2 Fugal went in as a skeptic. Within days, he put his own security on site & felt there was a 95% chance there was a natural/prosaic explanation behind the odd stories. 6 months into his ownership, his skepticism melted away as he & others had a world-view, changing UFO sighting.
3 Phenomenon is transient. EM anomalies are unpredictable. Had an @KSLcom crew in for the day from SLC & BF told them not to expect anything 2 happen. Sure enough, the ir drone fell out of the sky & gave a warning message the drone operator had never seen after years of drone op.
1 @MickWest believes @chad_vfa41 shot FLIR video of another F-18. Underwood, who did NOT see the object w/his own eyes, shared his thoughts to @CBMDP in 2019.
Chad U: "The thing that stood out 2 me the most was how erratic it was behaving. And what I mean by 'erratic' is that
2 CU: "its changes in altitude, air speed, & aspect were just unlike things that I’ve ever encountered b4 flying against other air targets. It was just behaving in ways that aren’t physically normal. That’s what caught my eye. Because, aircraft, whether they’re manned or
3 CU: "unmanned, still have to obey the laws of physics. They have to have some source of lift, some source of propulsion. The Tic Tac was not doing that. It was going from like 50,000 feet to, you know, a hundred feet in like seconds, which is not possible."
1 Why should I believe anything @JeremyCorbell says from sources related 2 military cases?
From C2C, May 21, 2017, 5 months b4 we learned about Tic Tac case @ TTSA event & 7 months b4 NYT article.
"There's a term, Anomalous Aerial Vehicles...off the coast of California in 2004,
2 JC: "there was an event where there was a deployment, and there were military pilots who engaged an object, or a series of objects, actually, over a series of days. I wanna make sure to find DIRECT witnesses & try to find exactly the facts. There was one pilot in particular,
3 JC: "and I have talked with him, but he has give me no authorization to talk about that. But there was an individual who was within a 100 feet of this thing and engaged it. It actually, actively jammed his weapon systems and radar systems. And briefly, for a moment, there was
1 Pyramid? I didn't see no stinking pyramid in that video! WTF, Corbell?
Me: "Could u clarify. Do you know if people saw a pyramid shape with their eyes? Did it say in the report?"
@JeremyCorbell: "It was clarified, very specifically & in detail, that what we are observing in
2 JC: "that footage - used as an educational tool for our armed forces & for our intelligence communities - that what is being observed @ the ANGLE of observation, was triangle shaped, because of the angle. But indeed, these were pyramids. And they tried 2 make a HUGE
3 JC: "distinction, as these classified briefings were relayed to me, that these were not known stealth, or anything, as we know it. That's what it said in the briefing. So can I stand by anything other than that? At this time, I'm gonna say...no. However I WILL say that there's