1 LE explains there are laws preventing him from conducting disinfo ops vs. Americans. Then adds:

"There r plenty of people in the UFO community, right now, that r conducting disinfo operations against us, but they're not former, federal employees." ~@LueElizondo 2 @PodcastUFO
2 "We're dealing with something that may change the very paradigm in which the human species looks at itself and views itself in the Universe." ~Lue
3 "The moment the government, writ large, comes to me and says, 'Lue, stand down,' I'll probably stand down. But I haven't been told that, yet, by my gov't. I've been told that by certain people in the gov't but they don't represent the gov't." ~Lue
4 That's a bit odd. Lue is now a private citizen, so why would "The Government" have any say over what he's doing right now? And who in "The Government" would he need to hear it from in order to make him stand down?
5 Lue has NOT spoken to General Mattis since he (Lue) resigned. He hasn't reached out to Lue and Lue hasn't reached out to him.
6 Lue mentions how different folks in gov't c this differently & inaccurate info. is being shared w/American people, & that's a problem. IG investigation going on & ultimately, LE thinks this will probably (hopefully) lead to open hearings w/Congress 4 the public to be part of.
7 If Lue is asked to testify in front of Congress (Martin specifies a closed-door hearing), he's not sure he'd have much of a choice (subpoena power) but to go.

So...YES, he would do it.
8 Lue: "I've stated for the record what my BELIEF (my emphasis) is. Simply put, yes. I believe that there are elements within the U.S. gov't that are in possession of some very exotic material that needs further analysis and study. And that is my personal belief based upon my
9 Lue: "personal observations during my time in this program, & afterwards. But I'm gonna be very careful not to state something that really isn't up to me to discuss. If the government is in possession of something, then it is up to the government to make a determination how it
10 Lue: "wants to let the American people know. And then if the American people are unsatisfied with that, well then you know what, we take it up with the government & we get new, elected leaders & we put people in office that we want there that are gonna represent our interests
11 Lue: "and make the government do what we want it to do.

"As far as crash retrievals, etc., that's really up to the government to discuss what it has and what it doesn't have. And that's true whether it's parts of some sort of new technology from a foreign adversary that we
12 Lue: "happen to collect, or a new part of a satellite platform, or a new part of a UAP/UFO. The government is gonna have to ultimately answer that. I suspect that there is an effort underway right now, within the government, to address that (I've heard the same thing 👽 ~Joe),
13 Lue: "but specifically how and by whom, I can't elaborate."

~@LueElizondo to Martin @PodcastUFO
14 Caller Rob: "This may be a clue to the vulnerability of these unknowns. If they're running along w/some sort of an anti-gravity or gravitational assist or control, a nuclear-generated, electromagnetic pulse may interrupt their thrust. And you can imagine, if you're going along
15 Rob: "in a bubble of your own gravity, and something interrupts it, you can end up like a big on a windshield."

Lue: "Certainly, certainly what is being looked at right now. I'll be careful not to pontificate too much. There is definitely some speculation...if that is
16 Lue: "what is being used, that perhaps an EMP may be able to interfere with that technology."

Rob: "Commander Fravor said, as they painted that object, the Tic Tac, with his radar, it started jamming their radar in every way u can & then Kevin Day said, at one time,
17 Rob: "it was raining UFOs, which is classic radar jamming (did he mean spoofing? ~Joe) so they are very, very concerned when they get painted w/radar bc they know we've got nuclear devices."

Lue: "Rob, TY for sharing, that was very insightful."
18 Watch Lue's face/smile during that exchange.

19
bug 🕷

Dammit.
20: Lue: "I think ur going to see an elevation & escalation of mainstream reporting on this topic (60 Minutes & hopefully, more...Joe). Outlets that have typically or historically stayed away from this topic are beginning to have this discussion w/their audience & their viewers.
21 Lue: "That's an indicator that the tide is changing, that it's becoming easier to have this conversation. You have now senior academics & senior scientists coming out of the shadows & saying, 'You know what? Yeah, we should be studying this, we should be looking at this. I
22 Lue: "'wanted to say anything before but now I have the courage to say something.' I think [May of 2021] is going to be pivotal 4 this conversation. I think it's gonna became easier to talk about in the coming months, especially before the [180 day] report is due to Congress."
23 Elizondo says lots going on behind the scenes and this isn't, as the caller suggested, being "carefully orchestrated" as much as it's "being coordinated." A degree of synchronization between the legislative & executive branches and international partners is required so nobody
24 is ahead of anybody else. Just keep doing things the way we've been doing them as it seems to be working.

Caller asks about Ariel/Ruwa encounter in Zimbabwe.

Lue says, "What most people may not know is that there was a uranium mine near by. Coincidence? I don't know."
25 Talks about how it's great to have so many witnesses to the Ruwa case and how the kids have been consistent in the way they tell their stories. Kids are known to fib a times but it's very unusual to have all the kids tell the same fib. Also had adults & teachers present. I DO
26 Lue: "think it's significant."

I could be wrong but this may be the first time Lue has talked about this case. he says other compelling cases that have flown under the radar will be coming to light in future. Didn't say if they were similar to Ruwa/Ariel.
27 Caller is @Julesofthwood ! "What kind of data aight NOAA have, considering their broad collection abilities. Are they FOIA-able?"

Lue: "NOAA has some of the most sophisticated Doppler weather radar available. It is extremely precise and is very pervasive across the country."
28 Lue: NOAA has ground, space and water-based platforms & it can be applied to this topic. They're trying to engage them, along with FAA (and others) & in order to get them "under the tent."
29 Caller asks about 1965 Kecksburg incident, which is an alleged crash retrieval case in Pennsylvania. Lue is not familiar with it.

Next Caller: Where the hell is the @usairforce on this?

Lue: Reminds us they were in charge of Project Blue Book & how the were under pressure
30 Lue: to close that effort & move on. Nothing to see here, folks. Probably political pressure came from high up. Once they said (at conclusion of PBB in 1969) these objects aren't a concern and not a real issue, it's hard to go back on that and admit you were wrong. Right now,
31 Lue: Navy is in charge but needs to include Air Force, Space Force, Coast Guard and yes, even the Army, who are seeing these things as well. Thinks it will switch to something more comprehensive and robust as opposed to just the Navy being at the helm.
32 Lue's last message: "Have the courage to ask the questions. Be fearless in asking the questions in the pursuit of the truth. Don't let anybody tell you that the questions ur asking are dumb or stupid or irrelevant. You have the courage & commitment to ask those questions.
33 Lue: "Have the courage to put ur government on the spot. Have the courage to put ME on the spot. Have the courage to ask the hard questions to anybody who says they're committed to this effort. Be mindful of those individuals that are charlatans who are selling u a narrative.
34 Lue: "They probably don't have your best interests at heart. Have the courage to think for yourself and have your own opinions. It's okay bc none of us have yet, all the answers. This is exactly why we're having this conversation. Have the courage to pursue
35 Lue: "this topic in any way u think u need to pursue it."

36 Bed time!

Great question, @Julesofthwood!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe Murgia

Joe Murgia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheUfoJoe

10 May
1 Decent article from 2003 on Vallee/Harris, 1945 alleged crash/retrieval case.

"The two men, now in their mid to late 60s, still have a piece of the craft & know where other parts were buried by the military.

"'The work detail wasn't too efficient,' said Reme, who noted from
2 "his experience in the Marines that military parts had numbers and were carefully catalogued. 'The soldiers threw some of the pieces down a crevice, so they wouldn't have to carry them,' he said. 'Then they would kick dirt and rocks and brush over them to cover them up.'
3 "'I don't know if they knew what they had,' Reme said. 'It was a fairly crude craft with no parts numbers on it, and the piece we have, we were told is not remarkably machined even for 1945. But there's nothing that says aliens have to travel in remarkable spaceships. Given
Read 9 tweets
10 May
1 "Stanton Friedman and Don Berliner finally were forced to disavow their star witness in a letter to the editor published in the Jan. 1993 issue of the MUFON UFO Journal. They publicly stated that they 'no longer have confidence in the testimony of Gerald Anderson, who claims to
2 "'have stumbled upon a crash site with members of his family. Anderson has admitted falsifying a document & so his testimony about finding wreckage of a crashed flying saucer near the Plains of San Augustin in western New Mexico, can no longer be seen as sufficiently reliable.'
3 "However, Friedman and Berliner went on 'This does not mean (we) feel there was no crash at the Plains of San Augustin; There is considerable impressive testimony to such an event. Nor does it mean that everything reported by Gerald Anderson is without value.'
Read 4 tweets
26 Apr
1 Will live tweet as much as I can w/tonight's C2C w/Knapp/Fugal/Corbell & Reuben Langdon (Citizens Hearing on UFO Disclosure). I'll only include new stuff. As I said yesterday, it's a great time to be alive, so if you're gonna complain about every little thing, go elsewhere.
2 Fugal went in as a skeptic. Within days, he put his own security on site & felt there was a 95% chance there was a natural/prosaic explanation behind the odd stories. 6 months into his ownership, his skepticism melted away as he & others had a world-view, changing UFO sighting.
3 Phenomenon is transient. EM anomalies are unpredictable. Had an @KSLcom crew in for the day from SLC & BF told them not to expect anything 2 happen. Sure enough, the ir drone fell out of the sky & gave a warning message the drone operator had never seen after years of drone op.
Read 37 tweets
25 Apr
1 @MickWest believes @chad_vfa41 shot FLIR video of another F-18. Underwood, who did NOT see the object w/his own eyes, shared his thoughts to @CBMDP in 2019.

Chad U: "The thing that stood out 2 me the most was how erratic it was behaving. And what I mean by 'erratic' is that
2 CU: "its changes in altitude, air speed, & aspect were just unlike things that I’ve ever encountered b4 flying against other air targets. It was just behaving in ways that aren’t physically normal. That’s what caught my eye. Because, aircraft, whether they’re manned or
3 CU: "unmanned, still have to obey the laws of physics. They have to have some source of lift, some source of propulsion. The Tic Tac was not doing that. It was going from like 50,000 feet to, you know, a hundred feet in like seconds, which is not possible."
Read 8 tweets
25 Apr
1 Why should I believe anything @JeremyCorbell says from sources related 2 military cases?

From C2C, May 21, 2017, 5 months b4 we learned about Tic Tac case @ TTSA event & 7 months b4 NYT article.

"There's a term, Anomalous Aerial Vehicles...off the coast of California in 2004,
2 JC: "there was an event where there was a deployment, and there were military pilots who engaged an object, or a series of objects, actually, over a series of days. I wanna make sure to find DIRECT witnesses & try to find exactly the facts. There was one pilot in particular,
3 JC: "and I have talked with him, but he has give me no authorization to talk about that. But there was an individual who was within a 100 feet of this thing and engaged it. It actually, actively jammed his weapon systems and radar systems. And briefly, for a moment, there was
Read 7 tweets
25 Apr
1 Pyramid? I didn't see no stinking pyramid in that video! WTF, Corbell?

Me: "Could u clarify. Do you know if people saw a pyramid shape with their eyes? Did it say in the report?"

@JeremyCorbell: "It was clarified, very specifically & in detail, that what we are observing in
2 JC: "that footage - used as an educational tool for our armed forces & for our intelligence communities - that what is being observed @ the ANGLE of observation, was triangle shaped, because of the angle. But indeed, these were pyramids. And they tried 2 make a HUGE
3 JC: "distinction, as these classified briefings were relayed to me, that these were not known stealth, or anything, as we know it. That's what it said in the briefing. So can I stand by anything other than that? At this time, I'm gonna say...no. However I WILL say that there's
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(