1. This is a very important paper which traces long distances moves for different classes of people. The big conclusion is that the moves of more affluent higher income people are away from more restrictive or stringent place to less restrictive ones. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
2. "We find 10-20% of moves between April 2020-February 2021 were influenced by COVID-19, with a significant shift in migration towards smaller cities, lower cost of living locations, and locations with fewer
pandemic-related restrictions."
3. "We find very different patterns across higher-income and lower-income migrants with higher income households moving out of more populous cities at greater rates, and moving more for lifestyle reasons and much less for work-related reasons compared to the pre-pandemic period."
4. "We find households are moving away relatively more from areas with greater remote work jobs, more stringent pandemic-related restrictions, and areas with higher rent-levels during the pandemic compared to normal times."
5. "Households are moving to areas with fewer cases, less restrictions, lower density, and lower rent relatively more."
6. "the high costs of indoor socialization during the pandemic has led to a significant change in how people spend their time: an increase in outdoor activities and
more time spent in one's own home versus in common areas indoors ..."
7. "These changes in time-use will increase the value of a good climate, access to outdoor recreation, and also the amount of space in one's home. "
8. "larger households with kids will have some different motivations for moving than households without kids. For instance, 5% of COVID-19 influenced moves cited having access to in-person learning as an important factor in their decision."
9. My take on this is that the overall driver in these migrations is flight from restrictions. Higher income households are moving from more restrictive places (which also happen to be larger, denser & bluer) to less restrictive places.
10. These households have more ability to move & less tolerance for restrictions. They feel they can manage risk on their own without government restrictions. They also prefer environments where in-person schooling is more likely.
11. This is even more the case with entrepreneurs, VCs, investment & real estate types who thrive on risk. They prefer & are voting with their feet for less risk-averse, less stringent, more open places.
12. This is coupled with fear of an ongoing pandemic, & a preference not simply for less density but for warmer climates & for more outdoor space - both for conducting business & outdoor socializing.
13. What I think is driving these moves is a preference for "normalcy", the pursuit of personal freedom & day to day liberty, & the ability to live one's life & family they way you choose, less subject to government mandates.
14. I think this, and not density per se, lies behind these moves.
15. And these are moves that are driven by class position & demography, with older, more affluent people moving toward warmer, less dense, less stringent locations & younger, highly educated people continuing to head to superstar cities.
16. My hunch is we are at best mid-way through this sort on openness, risk & stringency. if the pandemic flares uop again in the fall & winter & there is another round of restrictions in superstar cities & tech hubs (NY, Chicago, Toronto, San Francisco), ...
17. Then this sort will accelerate further ...
18. In any event, it is time we add risk-aversion vs. risk acceptance - or what the authors of this paper call stringency - to the dimensions which are driving America's ongoing Big Sort ... Again, paper is here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
19. There is nothing essentially new about this. Innovators, creatives etc have always migrated to places that were open & they could express themselves, live their lives & risks.
20. This is why creatives & innovators moved to cities like NYC & San Francisco decades ago to begin with.
21. This is part of what drew entrepreneurs & innovators to Silicon Valley during the 60s, 70s & 80s.
22. But now many of those same places have become far less risk oriented. And so we are seeing the beginnings of a new sort on this dimension. The emergence of new risk frontiers. It is an old story in American history.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. I have no doubt superstar cities will be fine in the long run. But I think this fall and winter will be a critical time for the short to medium term prospects of places like New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Boston, and Toronto.
2. I think one reason people - particularly risk seeking entrepreneurs, venture capitalists & finance types - have been flocking to places like Miami and Austin, is the ability to go about their lives and business freeway. In a word personal liberty.
3. If all goes well this fall and winter up north, I think many. will return, and many more will stay put...
1. I am an American who lives in Canada. And I spend considerable time in both countries. During this COVID crisis, I have come to see a troubling divide in how the US treats Canadians versus how Canada treats Americans (and its own citizens who travel to America).
2. As of now, much of the US welcomes Canadians into the country with a PCR test. It imposes no quarantine & no restrictions.
3. US states & cities readily vaccinate Canadians in the US. not just residents but travellers & visitors. I personally know dozens upon dozens of Canadians who have been vaccinated in the US.
2. There is no doubt in my mind that clustering will remain critical to both innovation & productivity growth, even in the wake of COVID-19 and the rise of remote work.
3. Clustering has only become stronger in the wake of previous advances in "distance enhancing" technology. Not so obvious reasons why this time should be different.
1. A few thoughts on cities & economic development in a COVID-19 & Post-COVID-19 world. Much of the discussion has been abt location (of work & residence) & which cities or types of places (cities vs suburbs) are gaining or declining. I want to focus here on economic development.
2. Way back when when I wrote Rise of the Creative Class I posited that the nature of economic development was shifting from business location & business attraction or where the jobs are to talent & talent attraction or where the people are.
3. I added that key to this new equation of economic development was creating places people wanted to be, investing in so-called quality of place.
1. Lots of talk about Miami's innovation economy. Here's a little analysis we did several years back. Lots more of this at our old site for the Miami Urban Future Initiative. creativeclass.com/_wp/wp-content…
2. First and foremost, Miami is a near completely different animal than Austin. Austin is a talent/ creative class leader, and Miami is a laggard (though it has some strengths which I'll get to in a minute.
3. Austin's creative class share is 34.% 8th among large metros. San Jose is first by the way with 46.4%. Miami is 47th (out of 53 large metros) with 26%.
1. Race to the Bottom - That is another possible take/implication of what is happening with the rise of remote work & the geographic shifts being accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic ... One we are not hearing enough about ...
2. I've already written about how the 1% is taking advantage of the pandemic & remote work to shift their residence to avoid state & local taxes ... But maybe there is more to it.
3. What also appears to be happening is that elements of the business elite - the capitalist class - in finance, real estate & tech - are shifting their residence & parts of their operations from higher cost, higher tax to lower cost, lower tax locations.