Thread by @AlisonBlunt

1/5 A quote, 'Since virologists have never verified their statements themselves and are reluctant to do so for understandable reasons - who would want to disprove themselves, their actions, their reputations? - we will do so with seven arguments.'

2/5 'Each individual argument will be sufficient on its own to refute the existence of all pathogenic viruses and the work of virologists (excluding researchers who deal with the existing phages and giant viruses). In the following points, the word "virus" is used instead..' ..

3/5 ..'of the phrase "pathogenic virus."
1. The matter of alignment
2. The lack of control experiments regarding alignment
3. Alignment is only carried out through theoretical construction
4. Viruses have never been seen in a human/animal/plant or in their fluids'

4/5 '5. The composition of the structures that virologists pass off as viruses have never been biochemically characterised
6. Electron micrographs claiming to be viruses are known typical artefacts and cellular structures'

5/5 '7. Virologists' animal experiments disprove virus existence claims'

The full article in mobile friendly pdf format, please consider reading, downloading and sharing independently of these tweets 🙏🕊️
ia601502.us.archive.org/19/items/virol…