1. Quote, "A new report [theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/upl…], published by the United Nations, has claimed the covid19 “pandemic” would have been prevented had the UN – and specifically the World Health Organizaion – been given more global authority."
2. Quote, "The report is titled Covid19: Make it the Last Pandemic and are the published findings of the Independent Panel on Pandemic Preparedness and Response, which focuses on how the world can look to prevent “pandemics” in the future.
This “independent” panel is chaired.."..
3. .."by ex-New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, ex-President of Liberia Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, & other political figures (including noted globalist David Miliband), & was established last May by WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. (How a report commissioned .."..
4. .."by the WHO, calling to give more money & power to the WHO can be called “independent” I don’t know.)
You can read all about it on the reports own website [theindependentpanel.org]. (Why a single report from the WHO needs an entire website of its own, again, I don’t know)."
5. Quote, "There’s a lot to unpack in the report’s eighty-six pages of bureaucratic double-talk, but their main conclusions are: [see image]
All of which can be generally summed up as “give the WHO (and their cronies) more money, and more power”."
6. Quote, "Each section of their recommendations contains several bullet points of its own, far too many to go through all of them, but there’s definitely some paragraphs that should cause any attentive reader to raise an eyebrow: [see image quote]"
7. "…Which means essentially legalising global surveillance programs on a massive scale, with – of course – “appropriate protections
of people’s rights” (and shame on you for thinking otherwise).
And then there is: [see image quote]"
8. "…Which calls for the Director-General of the WHO to have the power to declare a global “pandemic”, not because there definitely is a new disease killing people, but because they think there might be."
9. "Essentially handing the Director-General of the WHO the power to simply create a pandemic whenever they feel the need. Somewhat ironically the panel for “pandemic prevention”, is recommending making “pandemics” far more likely.
Further, the report goes out of its way .." ..
10. .."to praise the countries which engaged in the most authoritarian “anti-Covid” measures.
Specifically, China is praised both for their “fast identification” of the virus, and their incredibly stringent lockdown measures. Another country held up as a good example.." ..
11. .."is New Zealand, which was likewise very strict.
Conversely, the countries with allegedly “poor results” in dealing with Covid – though never named – are universally criticised for “denial of scientific evidence”, “eroding trust in healthcare measures” .." ..
12. .."and having leaders who “appeared sceptical or dismissive” of the pandemic.
It goes on and on in that fashion. Every step of the way praising centralisation, globalisation and totalitarianism at the expense of sovereignty, individualism and liberty."
13. "And while the report itself may couch its agenda in soft diplomatic language,the authors behind the report have been far more forthright about what they really mean.
In a clear attack on national sovereignty, Helen Clark is quoted in the Guardian [web.archive.org/web/2021051216…].."
14. "As well as criticising current regulations which put limits on the WHO’s powers: [see image quote]"
15. "It’s fairly obvious what the message is here.
Throughout the overblown coronavirus “pandemic” narrative we’ve seen national governments all over the world use the phoney crisis to “temporarily” expand their powers."
16. "Now the United Nations is getting in on the act, hoping to expand its global power mandate."
Quotes from "UN report pushes global government to “prevent future pandemics” by Kit Knightly, May 12th, 2021 off-guardian.org/2021/05/12/un-…
17. "Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated."
Please financially support @OffGuardian0 if you can 🙏🏽💓
The WHO changed the definition of ‘pandemic’ so that declaring one did not have to legally involve any unusual death rates. As we can see in government ONS mortality stats in England and Wales in 2020, there certainly wasn’t.
1/4 Quote from related article, “The virologists who maintain the existence of disease-causing viruses refer to a single publication [translator’s note: pubmedinfo.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/propag…] to justify their actions and pass them off as science, ..”
2/4 ..”this is easily recognisable as mind-bogglingly unscientific. The papers published on the 1st June 1954 explicitly describe the authors’ observations as speculations and that these speculations would need verification in the future. On the 10th December 1954 ..”
1/5 A quote, 'Since virologists have never verified their statements themselves and are reluctant to do so for understandable reasons - who would want to disprove themselves, their actions, their reputations? - we will do so with seven arguments.'
2/5 'Each individual argument will be sufficient on its own to refute the existence of all pathogenic viruses and the work of virologists (excluding researchers who deal with the existing phages and giant viruses). In the following points, the word "virus" is used instead..' ..
3/5 ..'of the phrase "pathogenic virus." 1. The matter of alignment 2. The lack of control experiments regarding alignment 3. Alignment is only carried out through theoretical construction 4. Viruses have never been seen in a human/animal/plant or in their fluids'
1. 'It is very important that people understand what is happening here.The intention is to introduce vaccine passports everywhere.But this is a disguise. It’s a world’s first digital common-format,globally-interoperable ID system with an editable health flag (vaccinated Y or N).'
2. 'It makes no one safer. If you’re vaccinated, you’re protected & are not made safer by knowing others immune status.
As in Israel, you will be compelled to present a valid VaxPass in order to access defined facilities or access services. No VaxPass, you’re denied.'
3. 'This system only needs 50%+ of the adult population to start up because of its huge, coercive power on the unvaccinated.
It’s illegal, medical apartheid.
If they succeed, it won’t help you to refuse. They’ll move on, leaving that minority behind.'
Quote, 'There are probably no two individuals precisely alike as regards the relative condition or action on them of their material and spiritual minds. With some the spiritual seems not at all awakened. With others it has begun to stretch and rub its eyes as a person does..' ..
...'on physical awakening, when everything still appears vague and indistinct. Others are more fully awakened. They feel to greater or lesser extent that there are forces belonging to them before unthought of. It is with such that the struggle for mastery between..' ..
..'the material and spiritual mind is likely to be most severe, and such struggle for a time is likely to be accompanied by physical disturbance, pain or lack of ease.'
A quote from 'How Science Ignores The Living World,' an Interview With Vine Deloria (July 2000) wrongkindofgreen.org/2020/11/22/how…
Derrick Jensen: So Indians believe everything has spirit?
Vine Deloria: Not exactly. It’s not something they believe.
[Vine Deloria cont...] What happens in the different Indian religions is that people become so intimate with their particular environment that they enter into a relationship with the spirits that live there. Rather than an article of faith, it’s part of their experience.
[Vine Deloria cont...] I think non-Indians sometimes experience this, too, when they spend a long time in one place.
Indians believe that everything in the universe has value and instructs us in some aspect of life. Everything is alive and is making choices...
1. A few quotes from doctors4covidethics.medium.com/covid-vaccines…
'Abstract: COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm. It is therefore in the interests of all those authorising, enforcing and administering COVID-19 vaccinations to understand..'
2. ..'the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of these vaccines, since liability for harm will fall on them.
In short, the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe.'
3. Another quote, 'The risk-benefit calculus is therefore clear: the experimental vaccines are needless, ineffective and dangerous. Actors authorising, coercing or administering experimental COVID-19 vaccination are exposing populations and patients to serious, ..' ..