People think I’m over exaggerating.

How’s this for hyperbole?

A second flag.

This one the owner won’t take down.

cbc.ca/news/canada/ed…
This recording must be heard.

Dr. Melanee Thomas @MelaneeLThomas describes the strategy of political stochastic terrorism by proxy.

omny.fm/shows/ched-aft…
While Kenney maintains decorum, claiming moderation, his Justice Minister is priming the UCP base for extremism. Specifically NAMING LPC, AB NDP & MSM as targets of ire.
Dr. Thomas describes the method being used to exacerbate polarization.

Albertans need to make themselves aware of the level of psychological manipulation being used by UCP.

It’s unprecedented in Canadian politics.
Why no one but this Political Science professor is discussing it is frightening.

This form of rhetoric is not the norm in a democratic system.

Creating an “us” vs “them” environment erodes trust and democratic norms.
This creates long term corrosive consequences, which we are witnessing with Nazi flags, increased violence and intimidation and increased polarization.

J’lyn Nye attempts to “both sides” this phenomenon. But it’s not the same rhetoric coming from the left or centre.
A minister of the Crown should be held to a higher standard. This can’t become the norm.

Dr. Thomas describes how this form of toxic rhetoric is specifically aimed at those who are open to conspiracy theories.
Those vulnerable to conspiratorial thinking are emotionally charged with toxic rhetoric that reduces trust and creates animus (hatred). When hard truths are required to be communicated, that’s when those vulnerable to conspiratorial thinking fall victim.
While this is a more subtle approach than what’s seen in the US, it’s the same process and produces the same result.

•Increased tensions.
•Belief that covid is a hoax.
•Hatred towards those stating otherwise.
•A rise in stochastic terrorism (seemingly random violence).
Except the random lone wolf violence isn’t random. It’s entirely predictable and expected. Giving political operatives plausible deniability for responsibility of incitement. But still raising tensions among partisan lines.
It’s why holding politicians to task for this type of rhetoric is crucial.

In Calgary a journalist had her tires slashed & a swastica left as intimidation.

Madu should be resigning. Not apologizing. He’s laid the foundations of radicalization of hate fuelled terrorism.
He’s not the only one. Kenney is now distancing himself from this form of rhetoric. He is now using minions to do the dirty work. (Kamikaze candidate ring a bell?)

If polarization gets so extreme that losers don’t consent to being governed by the winners, our democracy is lost.
We are at that point already and Madu is throwing lit matches at a very dry tinder keg.

There is no credibility to the claim Kenney wasn’t aware of Madu creating controversy.

The provincial government isn’t cracking down on covid deniers to make the community safer.
They’re cracking down on conspiracy theorists who believe covid is a hoax or over exaggerated and simultaneously throwing dry wood on rage fuelled fires of violent backlash.

That is a subtle and covert method of incitement to violence. By our own government.
Still think this is a legitimate government?

Claiming innocence and ignorance is vastly different that actually bring innocent.

Stop thinking this abomination of a political party supports democracy. Their behaviour clearly indicates they do not.
The exacerbation of covid, the frequent use of rhetoric that promotes stochastic terrorism and the shift in enforcement after a long period of permissiveness is contributing to the removal of democracy, increase in animus, and now provided clear targets for lone wolves.
Nazi flags are popping up in rural settings, hospital non threats being made, journalists property being damaged, photos of police cars in crosshairs, rising attacks on Muslim women and youth, irrational and unexplainable hatred toward the PM.
UCP is playing catch up to US GOP and Trump Republicans.

To what end? What’s planned?

More violence? Insurrection activities?

UCP’s in power.

So what happens when a political party is already in power and instigates stochastic terrorism? ImageImageImage
Consolidation of power.
Bomb* not non

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunshiny

Sunshiny Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunnshiiny

14 May
Told ya this is a distraction.

Right in front of your eyes.
Read MLA Orr’s post.

Kenney is the leader raised up by god. He’s an agent of god.

That’s Dominionist code language to affirm to Dominionists currently suffering from cognitive dissonance that this charade is entirely political theatre. ImageImage
Anyone who believes Kenney is in any imminent danger of being ousted doesn’t understand the base supporters UCP has.

But they should. The vast majority are evangelical Christians who have abandoned critical thinking and adopted faith in what they are told from their pastor.
Read 33 tweets
14 May
Distraction is an effective weapon to escape culpability and accountability.

Trump used it daily.

He’d say or do something so shocking, the real newsworthy information was buried. And in a 24 hour news cycle, the next day or two was all he needed to distract the public.
It didn’t work on everyone. Some people had the assiduousness of the determined and didn’t get distracted. But Trump knew the vast majority would run after the squirrels he tossed out as distractions from his corrupt and sadistic policies.
So I offer these screenshots to readers. Which one is the distraction, and which ones are the result of twisted sick sadistic policies? ImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
11 May
PART 2

Removing rewards (open society) to increase negative behaviour and attitudes by libertarians (more protests, refusing to wear masks, & belligerence).

And that’s why Covid deniers are calling in bomb threats, publishing photos of police in crosshairs and criticizing UCP.
Of course it’s more complicated than the simple framework I described, but that’s the gist of conservative hesitation to impose stricter covid measures. It’s being used to increase libertarian anger.
And because I live in Alberta, I have had a front row seat to the behavioural modification strategy to increase the intensity and frequency of the Liberty Coalition agenda in Alberta.

Its also why I believe Kenney is setting up Jason Nixon to replace him as leader of UCP.
Read 26 tweets
11 May
PART 1

Sunday, I wrote a thread in response to what I initially thought was an honest inquiry. While still composing a response, I realized it was an attempt to discredit the premise & me.

So it’s half answer and half cheeky retort.
But the premise of my narrative is firm. There is an abundance of evidence supporting the observation and conclusions I wrote about. For both the UCP behaviour and the attempt to discredit it.
Here’s more. While it’s anecdotal, hospitals typically don’t receive bomb threats.

That’s how serious this has progressed in 1 year. Those who oppose restrictions are at a precarious point in their delusions of govt oppression, denial of a pandemic reality & self control.
Read 26 tweets
9 May
Since the answer to this question is going to require multiple tweets...
Section 1 of the Constitution of Canada gives governments the authority and responsibility to override freedom and liberty in a limited number of situations. A global deadly pandemic is one of those situations.
However, Christian Nationalists, paleolibertarians and white supremacists have partnered to use Covid public health restrictions to further their agenda and consolidate power and support.

Not just in Alberta. Not just in Canada. But across North America and many other locations. ImageImageImageImage
Read 33 tweets
8 May
@ObamaLeaf @Strandjunker @alicemaried2 Again, not the point.

Is the point to punish, or to protect? To reform or to restrain?

A need to seek “justice” outweighs the commons’ safety & security?

That’s what radical individualism has produced. Failure to take true threats to existence seriously.
@ObamaLeaf @Strandjunker @alicemaried2 The problem isn’t the justice system, which is corrupt.

The problem is the premise American individualism rests on. That every human individual must be given precedence over the commons in the eyes of justice.
@ObamaLeaf @Strandjunker @alicemaried2 In the past, those making relevant decisions could claim ignorance of the inflexibility of magnanimous malignant narcissists. That’s no longer an available excuse.

Faith, not science, brought us the belief that ALL lives are sacred and capital punishment must be abolished.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(