1/Today's @bopinion post (actually yesterday's) is about inflation!

There are two big things everyone needs to understand about inflation, and neither of them concerns the price of lumber or cars.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/We are now seeing strong month-on-month inflation (~7.2% month-on-month, ~3.6% core).

Keep an eye on month-on-month numbers, not on year-on-year numbers.

This is a fairly substantial rate of inflation. But should we be worried?

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
3/What we're seeing now is cost-push inflation.

Supply crunches and bottlenecks are raising prices.

This is not scary, because cost-push inflation is never very large.

So what causes the scary kind of inflation -- the high, sustained, out-of-control kind?
4/What probably causes the scary kind of inflation is a REGIME SHIFT in people's expectations about the Fed's behavior.

Here is the key paper you need to read:

nber.org/papers/w28005
5/If inflation continues at current or higher rates for many months, and the Fed does nothing, it will be a clear signal that the Fed now tolerates higher inflation.

And THAT is when the shit could hit the fan.
6/But why the heck would the Fed start tolerating higher inflation? Its target is still 2%.

The answer is something called FISCAL DOMINANCE.

The Fed might be afraid to raise borrowing costs for the U.S. government.
7/Government interest costs are very low now, thanks to low interest rates. We have a lot more debt than in the 80s, but our interest rates are much lower.

But if the Fed hikes rates to contain inflation, those interest costs would also spike.
8/The Treasury can minimize this danger by borrowing in long-dated bonds, so it doesn't have to roll over debt frequently.

But it has not been doing this. The average maturity of U.S. government debt is about the same as it's always been.
9/So if the Fed is scared that raising rates (to contain inflation) would drive the Treasury's interest costs much higher, it might back off of rate hikes. That is FISCAL DOMINANCE.

And this could cause a REGIME SHIFT in expectations about inflation.
10/So the Actually Scary Scenario here is:

cost-push inflation --> Fed does nothing because of fiscal dominace --> expectations regime shift --> actually scary inflation
11/How likely is this scenario? Probably unlikely. If this inflation persists for another few months, the Fed will almost certainly hike rates, convincing people that the old Volcker-Greenspan-Bernanke-Yellen policy of inflation hawkishness remains in place.
12/But if this scary scenario DOES happen, then our least-bad option will be fiscal austerity (i.e., what Abba Lerner and the Functional Finance people say we should do to curb inflation).

That would entail a lot of economic pain.
13/So the Fed will be working hard to convince people that the old policy regime is still in place. But Biden and Congress need to keep an eye on the inflation numbers and be prepared to hike taxes and cut spending if we do start to spiral.
14/Anyway, this little burst of inflation is probably nothing. Wait til end of summer to decide if it's dangerous.

But at the same time, understand what the actually dangerous scenario would look like, and what we would have to do in response.

(end)

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

6 May
The purpose of making noise about China's increased desire and capability to invade Taiwan is to strengthen deterrence and avert a war.

Articles like this assume that the traditional strategic ambiguity provides enough deterrence. Is that a good assumption? 🤔
The big danger here, as I see it, is not "too much deterrence will make China attack". Don't think that has ever been how deterrence works.

Instead the danger seems like "too much ambiguity will tempt China into attacking, then we find ourselves in World War 3".
This sums it up very well.

Ambiguity is what leads to miscalculation. Miscalculation is what leads to war.

Read 4 tweets
6 May
Remember, most of these estimates saying capital gains tax won't raise much revenue are probably very wrong, as @omzidar et al. explain in a recent paper!

nber.org/papers/w28362
And the belief that capital gains taxes are the worst kind of taxes is based on incorrect interpretations of theories that are themselves highly questionable!

aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…

Remember that when we tried cutting dividend taxes (another capital tax), it didn't boost real business investment at all!

aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…

Read 4 tweets
4 May
On international tests, American kids score very well in reading and very badly at math.

Why?

My hypothesis: We de-emphasize math because we treat it as an IQ test, instead of a skill that anyone can learn.
I am not worried about top-end math education. Top students will find a way to learn.

I am worried about average students' math education. These are the students whose parents have not prepared them as much. But they have plenty ability to do math!!

theatlantic.com/education/arch…
Everyone is arguing about tracking tracking tracking. Excellence vs. equity, blah blah blah.

No one seems to be talking about expecting the average student to learn more math!

noahpinion.substack.com/p/someone-has-…
Read 9 tweets
1 May
Sometimes research tells us things we don't like to hear.

That's not a good reason to suppress the publication of that research.
The paper in question found that when people's parents are imprisoned, their children do better along some dimensions.

That's obviously not a conclusion I want to hear. But science means we can't shy away from unpleasant conclusions.

We need research to tell us how the world really works. Suppressing results for ideological reasons doesn't just damage the credibility of the scientific process; it leaves us less capable of actually making the world better.
Read 6 tweets
1 May
1/Let's have a little chat about capital gains taxes, shall we?

Biden wants to raise capital gains taxes for high-income people. This is a good move.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/The first good thing about capital gains taxes -- as opposed to corporate taxes or payroll taxes or sales taxes -- is that you can make them very progressive, so they mostly tax high earners.

Biden wants to do exactly this.
3/The second good thing about capital gains taxes is that they won't throw the country back into recession.

Capital gains taxes are macroeconomically safer than most other kinds of taxes.
Read 10 tweets
30 Apr
Listening to @rauchway's "Why the New Deal Matters", I' once again struck by FDR's characterization of democracy not simply as a procedure for electing leaders, but as a deep and pervasive ideology that could and should define all aspects of society.

amazon.com/Why-New-Deal-M…
This is something I think we've lost, and need to regain: Democracy as a way of life, not just a process of elections. Democracy in social relations, democracy in business, democracy in culture.
FDR also believed that democracy was the only ideology that could stand up to fascism and make a better world. He was right. Communism, despite its battlefield victories in WW2, ended up looking much like fascism after a while. Democracy, in contrast, built a better world.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(